Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: dyximan
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 82 next>>
Aug 6, 2020 02:43:24   #
[quote=CHG_CANON]
Where would I go to find out the information about whether the 18 to 300 is capable of moving subjects other than just practice
Go to
Aug 6, 2020 02:32:10   #
I Realize These are very general question and depends a great deal on what your shooting. I have a few questions all related to flashes. I see flashes that are rectangular which are photos are, and I see flashes that are round which are lenses are, What are the advantages a Disadvantages to each and is there a particular scenario when you would choose one over the other. I would use them for some portraits and/or outdoor shots when I needed I guess it's called fill Flash when the Sun is behind my subjects. And other times I would like to use it for long exposures to set off the final image to identify it at the end and/or beginning of say a light trail of a cable car etc. I want to thank you in advance for your kind answers please refrain from the snarky ones if you can't come up with a nice one.
Go to
Aug 5, 2020 22:02:58   #
Understood rook. But perhaps I should have Emphasized the BIF aspect as the stationary objects I don't have such a short period of time to adjust isn't so much the problem. So maybe it was more of an auto focus and/or focus question then a calibration question
Go to
Aug 5, 2020 13:58:08   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Thank you for posting an actual example as this example confirms 'lens calibration' has nothing to do with your focus issues.

Rather, change your focus mode and AF area mode. You can obtain detailed instructions from https://backcountrygallery.com/ for your specific camera.

You might confirm too the 18-300 will 'drive' at the speed needed to autofocus on a moving subject.


I also have the Tamron 150-600 G2 model and have had the same experience, I will heed your advice and look into Steves videos, I have watched some of his in the past, and understand he is quite the wildlife photographer and Nikon user. Thanks again
Go to
Aug 5, 2020 13:55:21   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
Thank you for posting an actual example as this example confirms 'lens calibration' has nothing to do with your focus issues.

Rather, change your focus mode and AF area mode. You can obtain detailed instructions from https://backcountrygallery.com/ for your specific camera.

You might confirm too the 18-300 will 'drive' at the speed needed to autofocus on a moving subject.


Thank you, I had thought I was in AF-C. thanks again
Go to
Aug 5, 2020 06:53:09   #
Here is one


(Download)
Go to
Aug 5, 2020 06:46:30   #
Grahame wrote:
Have you placed the camera on a tripod, selected mirror up, used remote or timed release and undertaken tests with a static target which you then viewed on screen to confirm if you have a focus problem yet?


No I have not. I will give that a try in the morning
Go to
Aug 4, 2020 23:23:19   #
I think it depends on how rough you are on your equipment. I personally bought A D500 and 2 lenses. as I have add a few accidents here and there in the past. I fell into the river and they were placed both the lenses and the camera body. but I had to sign a waiver that they would not replace the camera body a second time. I to was using the ensure that you mentioned. As you mentioned and as you know the insurance is not cheap but neither is your new investment. Just a heads up after sending my equipment in it did take about a little over 6 weeks to get my equipment Replacement equipment
Go to
Aug 4, 2020 23:12:55   #
Make sure you check to see what version it is they have A G1 and A G 2 I have the G2 and they tell me it's better and faster than the original G1
Go to
Aug 4, 2020 23:08:09   #
User ID wrote:
Why on earth would anyone wonder that ? I am assuming you have not been living under a rock.


Curious why don't people like you keep your opinions Especially the snarky ones to yourself and answer the question
Go to
Aug 4, 2020 23:00:37   #
I read a post a little while back about Lind's calibrating and some software focus 1 or something like that. I have a nikon D 500 with the 16 to 80DX lands and the 18 to 300 DX lens. I use the 18 to 300 extensively and it actually has begun to get Lens creep. I can live with that that just shows you how much I use it but I took some recent photos of a bird in flight bald Eagle in very few were in focus looking for suggestions and help software firmware programs etc or do you just suggest that you send the lands in to nikon and have them calibrate it. As I understand it is sometimes best to have it calibrated with the body as well. Any and all advice or suggestions would be appreciated except of course the snarky ones. Thank you in advance for your help.
Go to
Jul 29, 2020 18:15:11   #
RWR I'm sorry you're having a bad day but please lighten up. God-bless and I hope things get better for you
Go to
Jul 24, 2020 22:16:01   #
I haven't drank in over 30 years I didn't realize they still made that beer. Of course when I did drink I drank Samuel Adams I actually bought it from him at the bar in Philadelphia I think it was lol
Go to
Jul 24, 2020 21:50:11   #
I have a 10 TB drive that holds just over 400000 photos plus or -200000 J pegs 200000 RAW with the camera that shot at 21 megapixels So roughly 40000 photos per terabyte
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 12:19:08   #
JohnH3 wrote:
I want to preface this post. It is primarily intended for an inexperienced long lens or macro user.

Over the past year, I have read and even commented on a few posts where people have expressed dissatisfaction with newly purchased telephoto lenses. I understand the plight because I have been there myself. I am an amateur photographer who is constantly learning from those much better than I am; however, to the inexperienced long lens user, I feel that the school teacher in me might have some insight to offer. I assure you that your new Tamron or Sigma 150-600mm lens or even your 100mm macro is a good lens capable of producing superb images. When I first bought versions of these two lenses, I thought I had wasted money. I was very displeased initially; however, the problem was me. It was never the lens. I might just be that you are overlooking a few key elements in using these lens.

I came to some realizations when recently trying to help two friends that are both far better photographers than I am navigate the pitfalls of recently purchased lenses.

A 35mm lens tends to be very forgiving in many respects. You generally get sharp crisp pictures when using them even if making some basic mistakes. There is a reason that the lenses installed in smart phones have short focal lengths often much shorter than 35mm. On the other hand, the longer the focal length of the lens, the more unforgiving it becomes.

There are two components of using a long lens that I would like to present: depth of field (DOF), and motion blur. I will discuss them in that order.

Depth of Field:

Initially when I started using my longer lenses and especially my Canon EF 100mm L Macro at close distances, I was beyond displeased with the results. Parts of my pictures were always out of focus. I don’t mean the backgrounds either (bokeh). I mean the subjects themselves. I thought I was doing everything correctly. What I had not considered to the extent that I should have was depth of field. I was always aware of it and actually familiar with it especially with my then current prime and zoom lenses, but I was way off when it came to the 150-600mm and even more so the 100mm macro. At the time I purchased both lenses, I was shooting with a Canon T6s crop frame body, which actually compounded the problems.

My favorite DOF chart is the one in the Photo Pills App. It allows you to enter the camera model. You then enter your lenses’ focal length, the F setting (aperture), and the distance from the subject. One night after I purchased the app and started playing around with it, I made some inexperienced photographer discoveries. I was shooting with settings that produced very narrow or shallow depths of field. No wonder the elk’s eye and face were focused while his hind end was out of focus! Yes, the light came on! By this time, I also had my first full frame camera. I then started alternating the camera models in the app from my full frame camera to my crop frame model and discovered that with all other factors the same, the depth of field was narrower on the crop frame body.

The first two pictures posted below illustrate the difference of DOF with a 100mm lens between the Canon 5DMKIV full frame and the T6s crop frame. Notice that the full range of the DOF with the full frame is six (6) inches as compared to four (4) inches on the crop frame. The lens and settings remained consistent at 100mm / f2.8 / 10 feet.

On the third and fourth pictures posted below, I have changed only the aperture setting to F9 still using a 100mm lens at a distance of 10 feet. As you will see, the DOF widened significantly; however, the DOF on the full frame (1’7”) remains substantially wider than the crop frame ( 1’0”).

The next three pictures (fifth-seventh) posted below illustrate the DOF differences at f2.8 and a distance of 100 feet using a 35mm focal length, a 135mm focal length, and a 600mm focal length. As you can see the DOF varies significantly. 35mm = infinity / 135mm = 28’11” / 600mm = 1’5”. (Of course, not many long lenses will go to F2.8. You are generally looking at best at F4 and higher as you zoom to longer focal lengths. I maintained F2.8 merely for comparison purposes.)

Based upon this information, shooting a large object such as a large animal is going to possibly have focal issues (unless your intention is to only have a small part of the object in perfect focus) if you don’t fully consider DOF variables.

The final picture below illustrates the 600mm lens still at 100 feet, but with an aperture at F9. The change in that single variable now produces a DOF of 4’6”. At this setting, a larger object will be better focused from front to rear.

These same principles apply to using a macro lens at close distances. (F2.8 is often achievable with many macro lenses in the 60mm to 100mm focal lengths.)

What I learned was that when using a long lens or even a shorter lens such as a 100mm macro at a closer distance is that DOF becomes a crucial factor in obtaining a satisfactory image. I learned that sometimes I must raise the ISO and close down the aperture (higher number) in order to widen the DOF to a width where the entire subject is in focus front to back. I finally came to the realization that I can crank up the ISO and up the aperture number and still obtain a good quality image. I also learned that I needed to spend some time studying DOF charts specifically for the lens I own and use. I also keep my smart phone and the Photo Pills app handy when shooting with my long and macro lens.

Shutter Speed:

I always thought the shutter speed variable was obvious, but I later realized it was obvious to me because two friends from our local camera store (Cameragraphics of Auburn, AL) John Oliver and John Rhodenizer explained to me early on in my DSLR endeavors that you tend to get sharper images with faster shutter speeds. When I bought my Sigma 150-600mm, I quickly learned that it is “crucial” to have a faster shutter speed when using a longer focal length to avoid motion blur in my photos. I suspect that many inexperienced long lens users especially when shooting hand held mistake motion blur for focus issues. Motion blur occurs when you the photographer moves the camera minutely during the shot. To the inexperienced photographer, it can appear as an out of focus image. Even small movements are magnified exponentially at longer focal lengths.

Motion blur is easily avoided by using a faster shutter speed. Also enable IS (Image Stabilization - called numerous things depending on the lens manufacturer) to help reduce motion blur. However, stabilization modes don’t actually stabilize an object. They help stabilize your movement while holding the camera when shooting handheld. Some newer camera models even have in camera image stabilization modes.

I have often heard that that you should always use a shutter speed that at least matches the focal length of your lens. (Example: at least 1/100 for a 100mm lens or 1/600 for a 600mm lens.) Personally, as a lens exceeds 300mm, I double that number if possible. Admittedly, shutter speeds can be limited due to ISO constraints, light conditions, etc. I do find that in general by using as fast a shutter speed as possible, motion blur is generally eliminated and avoided.

I am sure that this post is elementary for most photographers on this site. As well, I suspect some of the seasoned professionals will pick it apart and tear it to threads; however, I passed this same information and explanations along to two very good photographers that I highly respect. I simply made the personal discoveries first. I do think they were both more satisfied with their photos when using their longer lenses and macro lenses after trying my suggestions.

As I mentioned, I am a teacher. Specifically, I am a music teacher. I have learned that photography is much like playing an instrument. It first requires understanding, and second, practice practice practice. For those of you venturing into telephoto or close distance macro photography, I strongly encourage you to study the DOF charts for your lenses of choice especially ones you are not as familiar with as some you use regularly. Learn to apply both the principles of DOF and shutter speeds to your shooting. Explore different settings and find what works for you when using your equipment.
I want to preface this post. It is primarily inten... (show quote)

Thank your for your post I was shooting birds yesterday at my 600 focal length and found only about 15% keepers I think this will definitely help
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 82 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.