Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: drklrd
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 77 next>>
Nov 12, 2018 20:34:45   #
cjc2 wrote:
On a Nikon in Continuous Focus mode, focusing starts when the shutter button is pressed half way down and CONTINUES to (adjust) focus until the button is released. Any VR system is going to slow down focus acquisition speed and is not needed at 1/1000 under most conditions. Essentially, VR allows one to shoot at much slower speeds while retaining good focus in the image. Best of luck.


thank you for actually what I was trying to say with exception to the 1/1000 sec. you mentioned. I shoot usually lower than the speed especially when the stadium lights come on initially. My Sigma 100 to 400 usually works much faster auto focus than my Nikon 100 to 300.
Go to
Nov 11, 2018 14:07:20   #
ChristianHJensen wrote:
I don't see where the OP talks about a TV. He asked about monitors.

I use the Dell Ultrasharp 32" 4K monitor - awesome color corrected (but can obviously be tuned for whatever color profile you choose) 4K monitor for about $1200-1300 - It is a flat monitor. I did look at curved monitors but they seem to have their biggest feature (gimmick) being curved - not actual monitor performance. YMMV


As far as I know they are all monitors these days as the inputs in the rear are set up for either type of input either computer or DVD or digital TV tuner etc. Only time it matters is if your input tells you on screen it is an improper or wrong view screen. My Security DV recorders both tell me if I have hooked them into a screen that will not display properly and then it won't display other than the message about it not displaying. I am sure the curvature of the screen will be improper if someone wants to adjust for camera distortion. I have seen the curved monitors and hated the fact while looking at them when you walked away the image became distorted and lost. My audio/video degree editing was always done with flat monitors. My Photo degree was done using enlargers. Since photographs are flat I would think the best display to edit would be a flat screen. No one who has shots in catalogs has ever used those camera distortion routines in Photoshop these days. Those catalog shots used to be done using 4x5 view cameras and my training on them was to correct in camera not in post.
Go to
Nov 11, 2018 13:46:59   #
tomcat wrote:
Focus accuracy is dead on because I use the BBF method for acquiring focus. The only ones that aren't in focus is when I react slowly and miss the girls when they are spinning on the bars and it's operator error. I do use AF-C and 9-points to keep the targeting focus points very tight. I don't want the potential points wandering away from my subject, especially during a gymnastics routine indoors where I'm shooting a very very shallow DOF. Every time when I am out of focus, I can usually find something on the wall or another person somewhere that has perfect focus, :) If my vision was good enough that I could manually focus, then I'd not use AF since the subjects are always within a very short performance path. For one event, I'm going to attempt to use the green light to let me know I'm in focus and shoot manually from there. I could easily do this if the lighting were better so that I could shoot 5.6 or 8, but a lot of times I have to stay at 2.8-4.0 range.
Focus accuracy is dead on because I use the BBF me... (show quote)


I never tried the BBF method. Probably because it required me to reset a button to do that and that meant one more button to use before I pulled the trigger. I have read about it and just know in My D7200's I will reset the focus by repressing the shutter occasionally until I feel the lock on occurs with focus in AF-C. I usually have more than 9 focus points. As for light I can usually get an f8 and with the Sigma 100 to 400mm the bottom is f5.6. When the stadium lights finally come fully on f8 usually works with either ISO 12800 to ISO 25600
Go to
Nov 11, 2018 13:29:02   #
armandoluiz wrote:
I actually did that with the photo number 4, but just a little bit to bring up the waterfall.


next time put a snoot on the flashlight and it will allow you more control on the light as it will narrow the beam of light
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 14:55:29   #
don26812 wrote:
I too have an R1800 printer. I have had it since it was introduced. I did get it serviced once or twice, opting not to do any real cleaning on my own. It has served me well, but I believe I will upgrade the next time it gives me a problem. My biggest decision will be whether to stay with Epson or switch to Canon. I had an Epson 1280 prior to the R1800. I finally just replaced it. It simply would not die. Geodowns, unless you enjoy working on your printer, I believe it is time to upgrade.

FWIW
I too have an R1800 printer. I have had it since i... (show quote)


Quite a messy job to work on a printer. I had an Epson once that finally on screen said it had to be returned for an overhaul due to it's age. It was quite old and was still working until I got the screen message telling me is was to old to work any longer. I laughed over the message and just replaced it. Funny how we get used to our gear and just want it to last forever. I think that feeling comes from film days when a great camera if sent for a yearly cleaning and repair when necessary was all we needed. Now these days a yearly cleaning sometimes seems not to be the case with cameras and out automobiles. Too many digital parts that seem to fail when you need them the most while repairs cost a fortune and buying new is usually cheaper in the long run for cars and cameras and printers.
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 14:47:20   #
Nice shots but have you tried painting with that flashlight during one of your timed shots? I have done the painting with light for quite a few shots in my early days of photography. You could also use a flash gun unattached from the camera as a light source to fill in areas that have no light in them.
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 14:43:35   #
Jim-Pops wrote:
Rain drops are big in Texas.


I Love the shot but I think using the blue from the water until it reaches the top of the shot could enhance the shot. To me the color as it moves up to the top of the shot should be blue and not the color you have now that fades into the blue. Nice shot either way.
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 14:39:47   #
speters wrote:
Easy in Photoshop!


Sure is you just have to make a few adjustments if need be.
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 14:36:45   #
JD750 wrote:
Lightroom Creative Cloud.

Is the inability to rename my images. That is a big deal to me. I use mobile devices to advantage accordingly. When I import a shoot to LR CC on a mobile device, I am thirlled at the power I have to edit and retouch. But the simple function of being able to rename the image files is not there. So when I eventually import them to my computer, I now have images with camer file names. AS IF I never turned over a camera counter or bought a new camera with the same DSC_0001 file name for the first pic. THAT IS WHY WE RENAME THE FILES. Common Adobe. A little help here, ok?

What is your pet peeve about LR CC? LR Classic?
Lightroom Creative Cloud. br br Is the inabilit... (show quote)


Why not just name the file in windows and then edit it saving it under it's new name when done editing. I usually find the shot I want and then name it using a part of the DSC name so I can reference back to the DSC name and then open in Adobe Photoshop do my editing and if I want I rename it then with a letter like A or AB to show it was an edit shot from the original. If light room cannot do it I think doing it before it gets into LR is easiest solve to a simple problem.
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 14:31:49   #
CO wrote:
Are you using the Picture Controls? If it's on neutral, colors will be less vivid.

It's also possible that the camera overexposed in the bright sunlight and colors became washed out.


I set to neutral so that the studio can enhance if it wants to. The other camera settings such as vivid seem to me to be just settings for those who will never use Adobe or any other digital photo program to edit shots with.
Go to
Nov 8, 2018 14:25:20   #
tomcat wrote:
I have noticed that when I am shooting in low light with my D3s, the 70-200 lens on VRII does indeed slow down the shooting speed. However, I will keep VR on for sharpness because I shoot at a marginal shutter speed of 1/500 to 1/1,000 to keep ISO down. Since I'm not shooting for Sports Illustrated, I don't worry about the frames per second and maybe missing the focus at the start of a burst. I start my burst shots in anticipation of the actual movements of the subject because at my age, I am getting more mentally challenged. I find that when I think I have a good shot coming, it's already happened. So I just starting shooting early and often. So I do keep VR on.
I have noticed that when I am shooting in low ligh... (show quote)


If you keep your finger on the button the camera may not refocus on the second or third shot so you will have all shots out of focus. The camera focuses when you are holding the button down half way and if set to AFC it will follow focus and refocus if you release the button to half way and then shoot again. Sometimes you may need to refocus during a shot that is moving away from you. Yes keep the VR on especially if you wan't to reduce vibrations from handholding and such. A monopod helps too.
Go to
Nov 6, 2018 16:18:23   #
Sparky54 wrote:
Hello to all, Looking for opinions on Vibration Reduction . I have a chance to buy a Sigma 70-200 2.8 lens without VR at a fairly good price. How would this work for sports , soccer ect. on a Nikon D 7100?? Do I really need the VR? Thank you for any and all recommendations.


I shoot sports regularly but I think the 70 to 200mm is a bit like swatting flies with a stick because of it's limited focal length only going to 200mm. I bought a 100 to 300mm Sigma to beat that short lens option. Since my D7200 can go up to ISO 25,000 I find the cheaper Sigma works great especially with VR added to it. My Sigma was bout at B&H and is supposed to full frame so I am supposed to be getting a little extra length past the 400mm range. I know my lens bottoms at around F5.6, I think because I do not have it in front of me, but since the D7200 goes up in ISO as high as it does I can still use the Sigma lens when night fall hits and the stadium light go on. I do year book shots with it a lot. I would advise to go to at least 400mm since the parents I meet and talk to have grown to dislike the short range of the 70 to 200. Sigma also has a 70 to 300mm lens with a f4.5 to f5.6 I have also used.
Go to
Nov 6, 2018 16:07:11   #
foathog wrote:
your solution is simple. Don't buy Epson!!!


Print head clogging is why I turned to Canon from Epson. My canon is also used to print a few color and B&W documents from time to time to avoid the clogging issues.
Go to
Nov 6, 2018 16:00:16   #
RWR wrote:
Yep, until the screens get better, we still need to rely on our meter readings, as we did with film. Doesn’t hurt to be able to rely on our focusing screens, either.


Meter watching is what I did to solve this problem before I asked about the problem. I was just wondering if anyone knew of settings in camera beside histogram and meter that could make the view screen more accurate. Apparently there aren't any settings to fine tune the camera view screen. I guess Nikon and Kodak did not think of that possible need. In video you calibrate your monitor before you start shooting any video at all. Your monitor becomes your final print sort of. Your video then plays well on most all video screens afterwards. There are standard setting in all video monitors meant for video as well as settings in video cameras that allow you to calibrate the monitors as well as controls on the monitors for calibration of not only color but brightness and contrast.
Go to
Nov 6, 2018 15:49:57   #
JD750 wrote:
I could work with net of 500 mil. Of course I’d invest but for just fun I’d lease a yacht and staff it with full time escorts.


Now that sounds like a fun trip
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 77 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.