Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: r.grossner
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 32 next>>
Apr 6, 2018 15:44:36   #
rdubreuil wrote:
Nothing Photoshop or the like can't fix RG, it's still a nice capture.


Thank you. I will play with the raw file when I get a chance.
Go to
Apr 6, 2018 15:38:34   #
jaycoffsky wrote:
Family event so I used this 28-70 2.8f lens on my new nikon D850. This lens used to be called "the beast". All pics were in daughters house with sb 700 flash, Manual mode, shutter speed 160, aperture 6.3. I used auto iso which may have been my problem. All pics were well exposed, focus ok, but there was a general dull no snap to the pics (all improved in post processing). I know the lens (bought new) is about 10 or more years old. Just wondered if maybe the auto iso could have cause the overall dullness of could the lens technology having changed and this is a generation of technology.
Family event so I used this 28-70 2.8f lens on my... (show quote)


Check to make sure there is not a dirty or crappy filter on the lens and try again. I have seen a crummy filter destroy the IQ of more than one lens.
Go to
Apr 6, 2018 15:31:18   #
Coolcameragirl wrote:
Thanks. I used a Canon 7dmkII with a 150-600 Sigma lens. I actually met a friend from up north and we took these shots on Blue Cyprus Lake in Vero Beach. We hired a pontoon boat for 3 hours and saw over 50 pair of osprey nesting. I would love to go back the middle of April after the chicks are born.


Two nests within a mile of home both have chicks.
Go to
Apr 6, 2018 15:25:02   #
TriX wrote:
Yep, exactly right. Blurry shots are useless (unless intentional), while noisey shots are usable and may be improved in post.


Agreed.
Go to
Apr 6, 2018 14:48:45   #
armandoluiz wrote:
What about the G1?


The G2 is much improved over the G1. The G1 was soft at 500-600mm. For me the extra $$ was worth it. I tested the Tamron G1, G2 and Sigma C on my own D750 body. This shot of an Osprey landing in the nest at the end of the street on Easter Sunday was hand held @ 1/2000 f/6.3 600mm ISO720 with the G2.


(Download)
Go to
Apr 4, 2018 17:50:18   #
Coolcameragirl wrote:
Took a pontoon boat onto the lake and saw and photographed over 50 pair of nesting osprey. The only problem was, we hired the boat for 3 hours and I could have stayed for 6!


Nice shots. What lens/camera? I live in Sarasota (north west) and there are several nests in our neighborhood. One right next to US 41.
Go to
Apr 4, 2018 17:36:20   #
FlyGuy47 wrote:
Attached are shots taken with an older Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 from my film days; I estimate I have had that lens for 25 years or more? Subjects/targets were chosen for their detail and texture. ALL shots posted have been cropped so they are less than 20MB each because a Large Fine JPEG from a D850 can result in files greater than 30MB. Nothing else has been done to the posted images. Shots were taken near the Gulf War Memorial in Marseilles, IL and Allen Park in Ottawa, IL, both along the Illinois River. I have used the old railroad trestle and bridge at Allen Park for photography testing before; it serves my purpose. File size dictated that the shots in monochrome be that way or else they would have to be cropped too much.
Attached are shots taken with an older Nikkor 50mm... (show quote)


I too have an old film Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 AI and a 85mm f/1.8 both of which I use on my D750 body and both are really sharp. It's amazing what you can shoot with a f/1.4 at ISO 6400!
Go to
Apr 4, 2018 17:00:56   #
armandoluiz wrote:
Hello!

I'm thinking about something and I hope someone can helps me.

I start with photography two months ago, only for hobby, I'm living in a very nice place here in Norway with beautiful landscapes and wildlife animals. For shot animals my cheap 70-300mm is not enough and since I do it for hobby I'm not willing to pay 1000$ for a 150-600mm, would a teleconverter be a good solution for me to shot those animals that I can't come close enough?

Can somebody give me some advice?
I have a Nikon D3400.

I did a fast and short search in eBay and found this one:
Very cheap
https://rover.ebay.com/rover/0/0/0?mpre=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ebay.com%2Fulk%2Fitm%2F152882393993


Thank you all in advanced
Hello! br br I'm thinking about something and I h... (show quote)


Forget the TC with a 70-300 Nikon zoom. You will not like the results. Save up for a Tamron 150-600 G2 or Sigma. I have the G2 and its IQ blows my Nikon 70-300 away.
Go to
Apr 4, 2018 16:41:36   #
jaycoffsky wrote:
I have processed all the pics. I will not use auto iso again. I think I will retry the lens outside to see how they look before spending a bunch of money on the new lens in this range which I kind of like.


Nothing wrong with auto ISO. Just watch it doesn't go too high.
Go to
Apr 4, 2018 14:55:53   #
gvarner wrote:
Not that I know what "pro level gear" is, but if you're not a pro I'm not sure it would be that much of an advantage given the leap in cost. If your 200-500 is a DX lens, it's effective focal length is 300-750. It won't use the full area of a full frame sensor.


The 200-500 Nikon is a FX lens. S/B if your body is a DX it's .... is 300-750.
Go to
Apr 4, 2018 11:40:39   #
papa wrote:
How about shooting in automatic where the camera chooses the exposure triangle? It's hard to imagine what anyone could learn from it.


I use all modes. Each has their own purpose. Why not use all the tools the manufacturer supplied? I once shot a three day wedding party with one lens (24-120mm f/4) completely auto. About 1200 shots with a 95% keeper rate. The reason for this choice was a lot of the shots were running and gunning under constantly changing lighting. There were only handful that I would have really liked to control DOF.
Go to
Apr 3, 2018 19:41:04   #
r.grossner wrote:
Reduce your focus points to around nine if you can.


And shoot raw so you can adjust highlight and shadow details in PP.
Go to
Apr 3, 2018 19:21:47   #
lwhitlow wrote:
To capture photos of birds in flight, which meter setting is best? I use spot metering most, but wondering if another setting might be better to keep birds sharp as I am photographing them in flight. Thank you for your input.


Reduce your focus points to around nine if you can.
Go to
Apr 3, 2018 19:19:49   #
lwhitlow wrote:
To capture photos of birds in flight, which meter setting is best? I use spot metering most, but wondering if another setting might be better to keep birds sharp as I am photographing them in flight. Thank you for your input.


If you want sharpness for HH BIF use a high shutter speed. I use 1/2000 with a 600mm and let the ISO go up in S mode. Dramatic increase in keepers. I have a D750 body which seems to handle 6400 ISO really well although it usually stays below 800 in good light. This shot was 1/2000 f/6.3 @600mm ISO 720 of an Osprey landing with dinner on Easter Sunday. Too bad there was a stick in the way.


(Download)
Go to
Apr 3, 2018 18:57:15   #
WILLARD98407 wrote:
Minnesota. yousers! wear your longies.


Burrrrr. Low tonight around 70. (Sarasota, FL) Sliders will be open.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 32 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.