Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Posts for: DrPhrogg
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 33 next>>
Oct 11, 2019 21:42:30   #
I have been using Lightroom 5.0,from original disk which I upgraded to 5.7.1. This is all I really need. I installed 5.0 from the original DVD on a new win 10 computer and cannot find a place to download ver. 5.7.1. Any help here? Thanks
Go to
Jun 30, 2019 21:54:23   #
Tomfl101 wrote:
It's funny, they do look oddly soft but everything around them is sharp. At first I thought you might have a lens problem but the feathers looks soft in all images at different points. This is definitely not an exposure issue. Could the feathers just be soft like down feathers on a baby bird?


I have done wildlife rehabilitation, including transport of owls and hawks. The feathers on the body are exceptionally soft to reduce noise during flight. The other animal I found to be oddly soft are bats.
Go to
May 3, 2019 21:21:10   #
It is not vulgar, but is it not art. It is designed to provoke a response, and I am not sure I want to be included with those who find stimulation, Using the maxim that less is more, can you get a better response by being less explicit and implying more. The Spiderman photo moves in that direction. This would not really even be good art for a medical textbook. Good art tells a story or conveys a message. I am not sure what message is conveyed here
Go to
Check out Infrared Photography section of our forum.
Apr 30, 2019 18:33:55   #
mizzee wrote:
After a completely useless chat on line with Adobe, I'm turning to you for help with what I'm sure is a dumb question and a simple fix. Somehow, when I was working on my images and trying to zoom in, I managed to turn the little magnifying glass that used to have a + to a minimizing glass with a - in it. Now when I click my image is reduced to the size of a postage stamp. Adobe told me to install the latest version of "the product." I have the latest version. I'm on a MacBook Pro, 2014 version. Thanks in advance!
After a completely useless chat on line with Adobe... (show quote)


Try looking in the upper left of the screen. There are a series of options that say fit, fill, and then a set of ratios. It is next to the Navigator button. Make sure that says fit. Not sure it will fix your problem but it is something to check.
Go to
Apr 30, 2019 18:30:42   #
jlg1000 wrote:
The ISO value of a sensor is a fabrication which was made in the 90's (I believe by Kodak) to facilitate the transition of photographers from film to digital and still sticks around. Computer vision system cameras do no declare ISO values, because they are of no use to calculate the correct illumination and exposure values to feed the RAW data to some algorithm..


I don't follow most of your post, not because of error but because it doesn't impact me. However. ISO was not Kodak and was not part of the digital revolution. It was first established by the International Organization for Standardization in 1974 to unify ASA and DIN.
Go to
Apr 30, 2019 17:31:36   #
The only word of caution on 3rd party batteries is swelling. When they begin to go bad, they don't slide smoothly in the battery compartment. If that happens, replace it. Otherwise the worst that goes wrong is you get fewer shots. A space battery fixes that.
Go to
Apr 30, 2019 16:49:07   #
larryepage wrote:
There is no difference in deleting an image from a memory card and reformatting that card. In either case, new data gets written to the memory which, interestingly enough, is exactly what the card was designed for.


There is a significant difference in terms of the card, but not as it effects the shooter. If you delete, you only remove the location of the photo. With the right software, it can be recovered. If you format, you remove all data. There may still be ghost left for a serious geek, but nothing I want to get into. It is the difference in deleting your address from computer records, and burning down your house.
Either way, you can over-write the existing data when you take a new photo. The only reason I reformat is if the card starts getting hinky
Go to
Check out Printers and Color Printing Forum section of our forum.
Feb 12, 2019 13:08:07   #
You can adjust the focus of both the lens and the camera on the 60D. This YouTube tells you how.
https://www.google.com/search?ei=BgtjXKqXDub45gKksKXABw&q=adjusting+focus+on+Canon+60D&oq=adjusting+focus+on+Canon+60D&gs_l=psy-ab.3..33i299.9340.14222..16357...0.0..0.582.769.1j1j5-1......0....1..gws-wiz.......0i71.IFX08YNm7wc
Go to
Dec 26, 2018 22:15:15   #
imagemeister wrote:
My experience is - if you are not using a CANON lens and CANON extender, it will not AF @ f8 period. Whether it can even physically attach is another matter..


I have a Canon 2x/L extender. While is works with all my Canon /L lenses, it will not AF if the aperture is smaller than f/8. My 100-400mm f/4-5.6 will not AF on any but minimal zoom. 2x 4.anything is greater than f/8 and I am limited to manual focus. The L extenders will not attach to lenses that are not L-type
Go to
Sep 13, 2018 23:54:16   #
Hal81 wrote:
This and that.


Thought i would add a useless sign. Who really needs this? Can anybody top this? In 3...2...1...


Go to
Sep 13, 2018 23:47:25   #
You might look at the EF 24-105mm f/2.8L II USM. The f/2 or f/1.8 are not necessary for sports as they will reduce the depth of field.
Go to
Check out Commercial and Industrial Photography section of our forum.
Sep 13, 2018 22:07:00   #
gvarner wrote:
We don't physically see and record a scene the way the camera does. There, I've said it. I hadn't thought about this until last night's "aha" moment. It speaks to the difficulty I have in translating what I see into what I want the photo to show, this thing called artistic vision. Photography, in a way, is like viewing a scene with part of your vision cut off, then adding the various pieces back through falible technology. The challenge is real.


Of course we don't see as the camera does. When we see an image, it is within the context of what went before and came after. It triggers memories when you look at it. However, it does not trigger those same memories in others. The artistic part of photography is taking a photo that can elicit similar emotions in another viewer. The camera actually sees everything, while your brain filters out those things you consider unimportant to the scene. If you can learn to step out of the moment and take photos as others will see them, you may get closer to an ideal. Just don't be disappointed if you never quite get there. It is a quest, not an end.
Go to
Sep 13, 2018 21:57:27   #
CHG_CANON wrote:
If you need one today, well maybe that will impact today's decision. But, if you have a recent vintage, say one of the top 2017 or 2018 models, in 2-years or so, isn't it more likely the market will be all mirrorless?


What would a mirrorless camera do that you cannot do with your current system? The mirrorless "revolution" is young. The technology will evolve several times in a year. Canon came our with an "R" version this month. EOS lenses will not work without an adapter. If you invest in a new system, how long before changes make it obsolete? Again, the question is what will the new system do that you can't do with your existing system. Better off investing in new glass for your current system until the mirrorless becomes more mature.
Go to
Sep 13, 2018 21:45:39   #
Awesome
Go to
Sep 1, 2018 17:11:09   #
deanfl wrote:
Located in the Atlanta Georgia suburb of Lilburn. The Official name is BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir.

The downloads look better.


Very nice photos. Atlanta will not be the largest for long. BAPS Shri Swaminarayan Mandir, Robbinsville, NJ is under construction and will become the largest.




(Download)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 33 next>>
Check out Software and Computer Support for Photographers section of our forum.
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.