Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: artBob
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 301 next>>
Dec 14, 2019 17:34:36   #
Bobspez wrote:
I propose the relevant questions are:

1. Is the creator of the image harmed in any way by what you do with it in the privacy of your own home?
2. Do you benefit from it?
3. Do you feel any guilt in doing so, regardless of the legality?

The same questions can be asked about any online appropriation (eg., pirated software or songs or movies) that you had no intention of ever buying.

I'm not so sure. If the "appropriation" is for personal use, and you would never buy it (examples: words from a book, a "nice" photograph temporarily liked until the next one comes along) it is common sense to do it for your pleasure. If, though, a photo is extremely meaningful to you, every attempt to purchase it or get permission should be made.

These are, simply, gray areas, always difficult, and likely not worth bothering about.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 17:25:40   #
bleirer wrote:
Now that's funny.


Especially because it's unintentionally so, methinks.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 17:23:47   #
Stephan G wrote:
Just remember the bard's words.

Will do, even though creeps on this petty pace from day to day. No brave new world, eh?
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 16:34:13   #
Dig deeper. I do have a Masters. I did teach college Art and Humanities courses for over 30 years. Your ugliness seems compounded by your ignorance, lack of skill, and fantastic delusional conclusions.

Mess up your own thread. You want a discussion of Art--start it. Your passive aggressive snippiness and pretense will get no more responses here from me.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 15:36:27   #
via the lens wrote:
In keeping with the apparent "dog theme" of the subject! (This is sent in humor in case someone cannot tell that...)

Indeed.


(Download)
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 15:29:43   #
magnetoman wrote:
Yep, I get that - but a lot of ladies in classical art do look rather pained, don’t you think?

Yes Perhaps the undergarments?
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 14:40:35   #
selmslie wrote:
I already gave you my assessment here yesterday.

What boggles the mind is that you, who claim to be a teacher and authority on art, would need us mere mortals to explain to you why you failed.

You should have been able to judge it objectively and realize that it wasn't worth posting.

Perhaps I don't share your egotistical, closed-minded modus operandi?

That having been shown, I will not respond to your limited and unhelpful responses here.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 14:36:26   #
Yes, it's primarily her face, as we tend to tune in on that strongly. The somewhat barren and subdued icolors of the setting add to my initial reaction.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 13:46:16   #
JoeJoe wrote:
I'm not really interested in your opinion as I didn't ask for it... You keep on doing what you do best... stealing others images then tell people your an artist...


I should have suspected you would not be interested in real art critique. However, this forum is not just for you; others might want to learn something.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 13:43:46   #
Stephan G wrote:
Let me pull out my squeezebox....

If there is a problem, I would say it was the starting point, the path, and the finish. When I view an artwork, I usually end up asking these questions. You knew the path you were setting. And the other two elements. However, your viewers will always have differing views. You have to have paths set up in some linear fashion. Sometimes it has to be obvious. (I am thinking Peter Blume's "The Rock".)

I will have to admit my feelings were deep because the Cathedral of Strasbourg, also Notre Dame, is ingrained in my childhood memories. I felt the deep loss when the fire occurred in Paris. Add to this having family living close in Paris. I did notice the historic references in your photo, but I could not determine the path.

The clock face did not speak of time passing. To me, it was of time stopping, breaking down. The fire was overnight.

As to collage vs composite, the images are identifiable as individual photographs in the collage. In the composite, it is not usually so clear. Both can have paths.

I do like the attempt. I appreciate what goes into it. Your explanation has me going back later this week to take another look.

Just remember what the great bard advised. "Ignore the groundlings. But make them pay their Pence!"
Let me pull out my squeezebox.... br br If there ... (show quote)


Thank you for the rich response--and the advice from our friend, Shakespeare.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 13:37:51   #
Powerful uses of angle and composition to emphasize the tsunami-like nature of fire devastation. Moving.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 13:36:33   #
Personal "I like"s are nice of course, but beyond mere taste, this photo shows a fine combination of composition types: rhythmical horizontal, rhythmical vertical, asymmetrical balance. Even that might make for just a decorative, pleasant photo. However, your choice of subject subjects us to the horror and glory of life.
Very impressively done.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 13:24:56   #
frjeff wrote:
Little bit of a redo with the Transform tool. Not perfect, but very close to what I saw when shot.


Looks good. Actually, either way looks good--they just have a slightly different, perhaps unspecific "feel" ir "vibe." This one is more Classical, being aligned with near-perfect horizontals and verticals.
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 13:22:54   #
selmslie wrote:
You need to learn about perspective in photography.


Photographers WARNING!
Really? Even if I provide correct information (OP: "Yes, shot at 28mm.") you insist on a kind of photographic papacy for yourself? I am sorry to say you provide quite a bit of disinformation (mostly because a narrow part of a larger picture) that may well harm the efforts of other photographers. (I've also read photo magazines that claim the opposite, as though overlap is the only element in perspective.)

Any lens other than 50-55mm give distortion of perspective. Rather than get into this again, if anyone is curious, here's a fairly accurate source that at the least should give you links to further knowledge: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Perspective_distortion_(photography)
Go to
Dec 14, 2019 13:17:13   #
I especially like #1 for it rich tones and colors, the fog being s special shot.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 301 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.