Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: GC-FineArt
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 23 next>>
Oct 14, 2016 20:22:32   #
Kuzano wrote:
My journey into Medium Format Folding Camera's started a couple of decades ago with an article called "Medium Format In Your Pocket". See the original article that piqued my interest here:

http://darrellyoung.blogspot.com/2011/09/medium-format-in-your-pocket-circa-2004.html

The article revolves around folding bellows camera's that use 120 roll film and fold out the front struts on a bellows for capturing images. I will let the article speak for itself as it only applies to one segment of the folding camera realm.... camera's that were made and used from the 30's to the mid-fifties. The film... 120 roll film is still available, as it processing and printing, as evidenced by the prints and negatives I received back from Walmart about a week ago. Processing and prints came to about $13, and ten days for send in, processing, and delivery back.

The camera I used is a Voigtlander Bessa RF (rangefinder) built in about the mid thirties. I have had four of these Bessa RF's and keep buying them as I can find progressively nicer examples. This is the nicest of the four and with a high grade lens of the period. The bellows is light tight and the lens is clear. All the covering is intact. I paid $200 for this because of it's cosmetic condition. There are a couple of flaws. The rangefinder needs cleaning and calibration, and the shutter needs a CLA. I will send this to Jurgen Kreckel (Certo6 on eBay) for service, ranging from $150 to $200. I have used Jurgen a number of times, as I have owned a significant number of these folding vintage camera's.

They are unique, fun to use, and rewarding image producers.

This camera is not for sale, but I have bought, cleaned up a number of them in my sales of film camera's. For the more involved work, I use Jurgen, as a reasonable repair person. He also sells these on eBay as Certo6.

Here are some pics of my Bessa RF. It has a removable mask internally so that I can shoot two formats..... 6X4.5 (645) and 6X9 Cm (690) The reason for the two ruby windows on the back is to align images using or not using the mask for the two formats.

Again, the best example of this 1934 camera I have seen/acquired. It's a keeper once serviced. I'll have about $400 invested. It will rise from there. These are becoming hard to find in such condition. I'm on the wrong computer to post pics from this camera tonite, but will do so in the near future.
My journey into Medium Format Folding Camera's sta... (show quote)


Here'™s a shot of two of my Voigtlander MF folders. The Perkeo II (right) needs some work but the Bessa-I (left) is in great shape for its 1940-50s vintage, aside from the shutter speeds being just a tad off.

The Bessa-I is not a rangefinder so focusing is done either by guessing the distance or using an auxiliary rangefinder. I use a "Hugo Meyer Pocket Range Finder" for that (middle photo).

And you're absolutely right, the Bessa'™s are compact, light, easy to load and produce great 6x9 negatives.






Go to
Aug 30, 2016 22:57:59   #
lamiaceae wrote:
Not sure what a "Visoflex" is, but I am pretty sure the thing is meant to focus to infinity on a FILM M-series Leica. Really not sure what the mounts on digital Leica M & R cameras are like or how the rangefinder can work with anything but a actual Leica M-Lens (manually obviously). The depth is for adjusting the rear element (or focus node) to film requirements of the Pentax lenses, M-42 Takumars and Ks are the same.


You're absolutely right, this "€œoddball accessory"€ (as you put it aptly) is exactly what it says it is -- nothing to do with the Leica Visoflex system.

Just FYI, from a practical standpoint, the utility of this adapter is pretty limited; nonetheless, it is certainly usable. For example, here's a quick snap of my M (TYP 240) with a Spiratone 12mm Fish-Eye (T2 K-mount) attached using a Kipon brand PK-M adapter. This particular lens is fixed-focus so that aspect is not of concern since the lens itself doesn'€™t focus in the first place; and framing the shot (or even focusing the lens, if that was necessary) can be done easily using the 240's live view or accessory EVF plug-in gizmo. Also, note that since the Spiratone is fixed-focus, this set up could be used with any M bayonet body, film or digital, although accurate framing would pose a challenge.


Go to
Mar 14, 2016 22:51:23   #
cboysen wrote:
Thank you very much for your very instructive reply. I think Mr Pavich was correct in suggesting I read the instruction manual before posing naive questions on UHH. Also, my 1 year of German in college didn't help much, but thanks again for your efforts.


If you’re replying to my post above, you’re welcome; and let me add that the full English language version of the manual begins on page 64 so just skip the first 63. :)
Go to
Mar 14, 2016 09:00:33   #
cboysen wrote:
I just purchased a Leica M7 film camera and I've installed the batteries and attached a lense but how do I know it's "on?" It's unlike most/all of the modern cameras that I've used. Thanks, and yes I know it's a dumb and foolish question so please don't scold me.


Turn the main power switch (see below, #9) to the ON position. Set the shutter speed to anything but “B.” Cock the shutter, look through the viewfinder, depress the shutter button slightly and you should see some sort of electronic display. (What you actually see will depend on the type of film, camera mode, speed selected etc.; but at any rate, you should see something to indicate that the camera has power. :) ) You can find a PDF of the instruction manual HERE if you don’t have one.


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Dec 29, 2015 08:26:17   #
JoeJoe wrote:
Just had notification that I made the Image of the Year final on ViewBug with this shot from one of first shots in my studio I was leasing one day a week to learn studio photography.... Yippeee


Excellent :thumbup:

See the current thread by Travesty: A link to some very inspiring images....
You might want to post it there too. :)
Go to
Dec 8, 2015 06:32:44   #
Dewman wrote:
Holy Cow! I knew it was big, but I wasn't expecting it to be THIS big! And heavy? OMG!


And it’s half the size of the 1000mm f/8. :)
Go to
Nov 30, 2015 11:45:16   #
Leitz wrote:
The camera takes 122 film, which is about 1" wider than 120 film. The image is 3 1/4 x 5 1/2 (postcard size). One could easily enough make spacers to use 120, but determining the spacing between frames could be problematic. It would be an interesting project, though.


Well, this is veering a bit off-topic in the present thread but anyone who shoots 120 in 6x9 on a regular basis knows that maintaining negative flatness is a genuine concern, even with cameras designed specifically for that format.

Imagine, then, stretching 120 film across the relatively enormous 122 film gate; where either the top, or bottom, or, more likely, both edges of the film would be totally unsupported. (There is a semi-hilarious You Tube video of guy loading his Kodak 3A with 120. Sure, he solves the “problem” of frame spacing however, if he thinks he’ll get any useable negatives, he’s delusional.) That’s not to say 120 can’t be used, it certainly can; and HERE is an excellent tutorial showing how to go about doing so. But the point is there’s more involved than a few easily fabricated spacers. :)
Go to
Nov 29, 2015 21:03:52   #
SqBear wrote:


Tell me though..... I've seen the bulb attached to the bottom side of the "shutter", but how does this work as I cannot see a hole in the bottom of the "v" that would push it up to trip the shutter???



These early types of pneumatic releases are simple piston & cylinder affairs so there should be a hole in the nipple where the bulb hose attaches. Yours may be blocked with crud or corrosion. Not sure what else to say.

-gc


Go to
Nov 29, 2015 11:51:17   #
SqBear wrote:
Thanks for the reply GC-FineArt ! And for the links and information too. Very interesting reading. The inside back cover states that the camera is a Model B-3 and this was noted in one of the articles you sent through the link. Looks like they made bunches of various models. You are right, there are many advertised on Ebay as well for rather small prices too, IF they sell that is.

Definitely going to follow the link for cleaning restoring, although I'm not sure about the restore part, definitely the cleaning areas.

Still, an interesting camera and one to put in a curio type cabinet.

Thanks again for the information!
Dave
Thanks for the reply GC-FineArt ! And for the lin... (show quote)


You’re welcome and I stand corrected -- it’s a “B-3” and not a “B-2” like I said. Also, judging from the photos, your copy is in pretty good shape considering its age, so, yeah, all that’s really needed is a little judicious and gentle cleaning/polishing. :)
Go to
Nov 28, 2015 11:02:57   #
SqBear wrote:
Bought this at a grage sale eariler in the year....
Really, what i am asking is is "rare" and is it valuable?

The shutter seems to be operating OK, the slide is OK, just a bit sticky perhaps, but works. The bellows appear to be in good shape, no leaks or holes or tears.

Photo 2 & 3 the view finder... the cover does open and function properlt. I do not know what the small "cup" beside the view finder is. It appears o have a small bb that would cover a pin hole in the bottom .. perhaps if it were level? however, I cannot get the bb to move around in the cup continer.

There are three patent dates stamped inside the back cover; December 8, 1898, October 8, 1901 and January 21, 1902.

Have not done any research as i felt you guys would have a pretty good idea if pursuit needs to be advanced.

Thanks!!
Bought this at a grage sale eariler in the year...... (show quote)


There were several versions of the Kodak 3A, yours is a variant of the “Model B-2,” see Scott's Photographica Collection. Forgo any thought of trying it out as these cameras used Kodak 122 film, a long-discontinued large format roll film. Best thing to do is just spruce it up a bit -- you can get some handy tips in this regard at Cleaning and Restoring Vintage Cameras -- and keep it as a conversation piece. These cameras are neither rare nor particularly valuable but in their day were top of the line Kodaks in their class and quite handsome actually.

(BTW, there is a similar “B-2” on eBay right now and as I’m writing this, bidding stands at $72.00US [26 bids]. )
Go to
Nov 16, 2015 22:46:36   #
Mac wrote:
GC
Thank you for adding this link, what an amazing collection.


You’re welcome. It is interesting, isn't it.
Go to
Nov 15, 2015 21:26:38   #
Mac wrote:
http://petapixel.com/2015/11/13/ansel-adams-pictures-of-an-american-concentration-camp-during-wwii/


Mac,

Let me add if I may this link to the entire Library of Congress Adams Manzanar collection. Of note (to quote from the introductory blurb):

“Both the original prints and the original negatives are displayed side-by-side (with the print on the left, and the negative on the right) allowing viewers to see Adams's darkroom technique, in particular, how he cropped his prints.”

Since compositional aspects of the Adams photos were raised by a couple of members, thought it might be of interest.
Go to
Nov 14, 2015 11:45:19   #
rpavich wrote:
It really is. Some people will scoff but it really has to be tried to be believed. There is something special about using a camera that doesn't have any extras; no auto-anything; no autofocus, no modes, nothing except shutter speed and aperture.


:thumbup: Could not agree more.

One unsolicited suggestion. Keep an eye out for a reasonably priced half case or “camera protector” as they are called sometimes. IMO this is not “GAS-eous” purchase. :) I never used my M4 without its original Eveready case and judging from the scuffs, nicks etc. to the leather, I have no doubt that that’s the reason it looks pretty much the same today as when it was purchased some decades ago.
Go to
Oct 31, 2015 06:41:39   #
Oh yeah, well ...


Go to
Oct 29, 2015 07:23:13   #
bearwitme wrote:
I am looking to see if there is a small monitor of sorts that I can use during shoots so that I can see the pictures as they are shot. I know about thetering to the laptop, but was looking for something smaller that I could use. It does not necessarily have to save the photos cause that would be on my memory card which I would then transfer to my desktop for editing and such. Could I do that with a good version of a Samsung pad??? Not a Apple user so Ipad is out of the question. Thanks in advance.. Connie
I am looking to see if there is a small monitor of... (show quote)


There are hundreds(?) of different “field monitors” for digital cameras. Here’s an assortment from Amazon, just as an example. I know both Adorama and B&W have a wide selection as well. The biggest problem may be sorting through them to find one that best fits your needs and budget. :)
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 ... 23 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.