Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Virgil
Page: <<prev 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 next>>
Mar 6, 2012 17:43:14   #
Good afternoon Fran. If you would like to expand your photography beyond people, landscapes, etc., go for the macro lense. For an oximoron, there is a 'huge small' world out there and it is very interesting and challenging. You may want to look at the "Macro section" of this forum for a while before you decide, that is unless that $1000 is on fire in your pocket.
Virgil
Go to
Mar 3, 2012 23:45:49   #
MT Shooter wrote:
Where did you come up with that one?
Thats un BELL eviable!

He probably shoud have used Uerizon!
Go to
Mar 3, 2012 23:38:36   #
A ll T angled & T ied
Go to
Feb 26, 2012 16:14:55   #
O.K. kiddies. You go to your room and you go to your room and I don't want to hear anything out of either of you until morning!!!!! And it better be civilized! Understood?
Go to
Feb 26, 2012 00:41:10   #
If you want outa here, you're gonna hafta come through me!!
Go to
Feb 25, 2012 01:21:41   #
Have you tried charging the battery??
Go to
Feb 13, 2012 23:12:35   #
1/1.6 x 10 = 10/16 =5/8

If that helps explain it.
Virgil
Go to
Feb 13, 2012 22:45:32   #
I didn't know it was coming down but I can't beleive this guy actually CAUGHT spacelab!!
Go to
Feb 13, 2012 22:34:54   #
I belonged to a camera club a few years ago and enjoyed it.
Met twice a month. One week educational , the other competition (sometimes topical). Competition was ALWAYS judged by people from a different camera club, which I thought kept things legitimate. Some field trips and and of course the annual dinner. The club has moved closer so I have visited a couple times and am contemplating rejoining. Definetly was a learning experience as a wide variety of photographic knowlede was present and available. As Mickey says "try it you might like it". The worst that can happen is that you waist a few evenings away from the 'Ugly Hedgehog"!
Go to
Feb 8, 2012 16:21:59   #
Country's Mama wrote:
I have been watching to see if anyone has the answer to your questions. I tried to do a search but didn't come up with any thing.

Thanks Country Mama! I was online for 4 hours straight trying to find it yesterday but no luck. IF my 'little' memory serves me right I think that post went something like
"Here is what happens when you push that button".
Thanks again, Virigil
Go to
Feb 7, 2012 11:50:08   #
guy145 wrote:
If I am not mistaken the pixels in the camra are fixed by your sensor in the camra. You change the the pixels in your picture with post production software, like gimp or PSP.

Thanks Guy for the response(the only one). This link explained the process (calculations & formulas) the camera executed on each and every pixel to record the image. I know computer chips get faster every time you turn around but it was pretty fascinating that each individual pixel went through this process at the click of a button.
Go to
Feb 6, 2012 21:12:51   #
Someone posted a link a while back that showed all the formulas and calculations used to create a digital image in the camera, pixel by pixel. I would like to show it to a photographer friend of mine. We are both retired computer programmers and you know how we like to compute those results fast.
Go to
Feb 1, 2012 02:29:56   #
Timarron wrote:
docrob wrote:
Timarron wrote:
docrob wrote:
Timarron wrote:
OK - First, for you "HDR haters", just move on, this is not for you and we don't need comments about how garish and overcooked HDR images are. I know all about that perspective.

This post is to share something I found that you can do with existing single images in your collection. Do it just for fun or maybe to create a "keeper" out of just a "so-so" image you already have. The images below might be over the top for some of you, but the point is to show what you can do with ONE image instead of the THREE or more you usually think you need for HDR. Play with the exposures until you get what you like. This is just a "how to" post and not a "how about this pic" post.

I took a single image and made two duplicates. Then, in iPhoto, I adjusted the exposure of one duplicate down two stops and the other exposure up two stops. I then took all 3 images and loaded them into Photomatix, and up popped the "HDR" image. With additional Photoshop or Lightroom editing, you could make these look very HDR'd or less HDR'd, if you get my point.
OK - First, for you "HDR haters", just m... (show quote)


Perfect! And I like your style here of presenting yourself and the point.
And what you did is exactly what (and all) that taking 3 or more images with the camera then downloading then processing via some HDR program does. You get (maybe) identical results.

A photographic analogy is: If the meter tells you the correct exposure is F8 @ 125 than you can get the same "correct" exposure either by using F11 @ 60 or F5.6 @250......Does this make sense relative to your HDR observation?
quote=Timarron OK - First, for you "HDR hate... (show quote)


This analogy makes sense if your intention is to get "correct" exposures, although with the various settings you list above you would get different depths of field. For an HDR image to work, all images have to have the same depth of field so all the same things are in focus. For HDR, you actually only want one "correct" exposure, plus one underexposed and another overexposed. When combined, in theory, you get a clear and crisp photo with all parts (shadows, highlights, etc) visible.
quote=docrob quote=Timarron OK - First, for you ... (show quote)


actually my intention was merely to assert that regardless of whether one combines X of shots taken in the field with the proscribed settings OR takes one image and in the computer makes mulitple copies of said image each image adjusted to compensate for different exposures the HDR effect is the same. Guess it was a little vague to use the analogy of changing Fstops & SS to demonstrate that the effect is exactly the same......

thanks for helping me see straighter
quote=Timarron quote=docrob quote=Timarron OK -... (show quote)


Ok, yes I agree with you about that. I guess my whole reason for starting this thing, was to point out that we can go back in our files and find a single image that was taken before we even had heard about HDR, and make a pseudo HDR image out of it. That is the beauty of some of the new applications available to us. We can resurrect some old photos and dink around with them to give them a new look.

HDR is a bit like Portrait Professional. In the right hands, you can create subtle changes to really enhance a photo. But, if you get a little lead-fingered on the sliders, you end up with something from another planet! This has, if nothing else, given some a new technique to try and at least generated some good discussion. That's what this place is all about....right bro?
quote=docrob quote=Timarron quote=docrob quote... (show quote)

Neither like or dislike HDR. BUT,,,, does anybody remember some of those pics from a 'century' ago that you are saving that could have been a little better if only.........! I see good possibilities here. Good thread. Virgil
Go to
Feb 1, 2012 02:18:36   #
Country's Mama wrote:
Ok you got me curious. I don't have an HDR program and my poor little elements 4 doesn't have it either. So I took the original made two duplicates bumped the exposure up 3 on one and down 3 on the other. Took them into photoshop and made three layers with the original being the background. Then I brought in the other two layers and blended them with soft light. Ran levels and bumped contrast a tad and this is what I got. Similar? Or not even close?


Too bad I wasn't home or I would have come out and stood in front of the house for you! LOL
Go to
Jan 28, 2012 21:06:12   #
Not a bad place to buy indian jewelry on the weekends either. JUST ASK MY WIFE!!!
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 16 17 18 19 20 21 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.