Maxim,
To me the sole redeeming quality of this image is it's interesting subject which looks like an entire family on one bicycle.
Other than that I don't think it's very good.
Got it. English.
Sorry I misunderstood you.
Lighten up folks. It was a suggestion based upon his title which was "Please Advise" I assume he wanted to be advised. I didn't kill anyone. This is photography for Gods sake. You may like the pole, I don't. That's what makes the world go round.
I really like the angle. Only thing I'd work on is that wooden pole on the right. It's lighter than the cowboy and my eyes keep going to it, instead of the subject. Can you crop it out or make it darker?
If you're using Lightroom or Camera Raw it doesn't make any difference at all In CS5 I always do the sharpening last because that's my workflow and I think it actually does make a difference there because if you added another layer, you would cover the sharpened layer.
I'd try using a tripod. It looks a bit soft.
Why not use a thumb drive, they seem to be more dependable. I don't do pro work for clients, so if the answer is rather basic, i'd still like to hear it.
thx.
Actually ford stopped making the Crown Vic. Both the Crown Vic Police Interceptor and the Dodge Charger have a computer chip installed which allows the vehicles to go much faster than the civilian model. I think the Crown Vic was all around superior but if it's not made any more, its not made.
I think the photos are straight. The tombstones, not so much.
No, not clouds. Looks like a 1998 Ford sedan.
Didn't know aliens drove sedans, always thought of them as truck people.
Why is that everyone who sees a UFO has a terrible camera and terrible technique? Is this because the aliens are smart enough to avoid people with Nikons or Canons or is it that they get a laugh out of people who see a light in the sky and think it's an alien invasion.
I for one would love to see one shot that wasn't faked and is actually recognizable.
My prediction: Color will be off but you will get a recognizable image.
In a lab test there probably is a difference. In reality, I don't think you'll be able to see any difference in the normal printing range of let's say up to 16x20. Unless you can afford it, I'd go with a sigma lens. I use them and I've been satisfied with them.
Nikon is strictly a line of sight operation. Check to see if your umbrella is blocking that little sensor on the remote.
You've hit upon the secret of why wildlife photographers get paid the big bucks. That photo that you are looking for may take you all season or you may never get it and have to try again next year. Birds just don't take direction well.
Good luck and have fun.