Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: newtoyou
Page: <<prev 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 223 next>>
Jul 12, 2020 23:44:14   #
JRiepe wrote:
Upon further research I found that the Giant Asian hornet is not in Illinois. My next guess would be the European hornet.


Yep.
Bill
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 23:20:30   #
quagmire wrote:
Here it is July tenth and people still shooting fireworks. Ridiculous. One of them almost set my Christmas decorations on fire.


Doesn't that just burn you up?
Bill
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 20:33:49   #
sippyjug104 wrote:
This is the focus stacked side view image of the beetle that I posted the face view of earlier. I don't know what species this is so perhaps the side view will help someone identify it for me.


I cannot say what it IS.
I no longer think Carabid, Not a Clerid, they have capitate or clavid antenna, not filiform.
Tarsi look wrong for Cerambicidae.
This may take some more digging.
Bill
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 20:11:51   #
sippyjug104 wrote:
Bill, the RV would be a workable and comfortable escape for Bud and I. Storing anything in it other than our RV Stuff is off-limits. A guy has to have some lines that can't be crossed. Our dog kennel building is full and we moved our car out of the garage to accommodate her stuff and she has the basement and the bedroom (my studio) for her use.

If there is a merciful God, I will be granted finding her a home of her own quickly. We've looked at a few already so the game is afoot.


Good hunting, Holmes.
Deduction and inference.
Bill
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 19:13:57   #
sippyjug104 wrote:
Thanks, Bill. Will do. I've moved three relatives within the last two weeks. My daughter and her dogs have taken over my basement studio (bedroom) and we have two+ homes worth of furniture here so it has been an interruption to my regular routine of posting work and I have yet to get started on the addition of your collection of specimens.

Your mentoring and sharing your vast knowledge has helped me more that I could ever express. I'm processing a side view now of the ground beetle that I posted its face view of and I'll have it for you in a post in an hour or so. I'll also do a full body view of this one as well.
Thanks, Bill. Will do. I've moved three relative... (show quote)


May have asked before, but did you consider using the RV as a lab? Or is it being used for storage?
You and Bud give the others more room.
The ground beetle has me stumped.That is a group with many lookalikes.
Boring Black Beetles is my nickname for them.
Like "Little brown mushrooms" would be another, or "boring bland mushrooms"
Bill.
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 16:57:48   #
docsteve wrote:
i will print photos of mine that i appreciate from home on my epson in 8x10 for perusal and judgement.
occasionally i get a winner that i want enlarged that i will have professionally framed ($$). i used to send said pics to apple; now i am asking for references for labs that i can send from my computer that will EASILY evaluate and print for me and return usps.
im not a professional, but do appreciate my work on my walls.
steve goldstein


Sam's and Walmart do more than passible work.
Do it in person.
Results not to your liking, no pay. Expedient.
Bill
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 16:46:03   #
sippyjug104 wrote:
I found this Velvet Longhorn Beetle on my recent walkabout. I brought it back for a focus stacking session and I find the shape of their eyes to be quite interesting.


Emarginate is the term, I believe.
This is beautiful.
I knew a lady, Elaine Hodges, look her up. Well worth the look at her work.
A scientific illustrator.
Her PhD Husband was (both gone now)an expert in moths, Dr. Ronald Hodges.
I met them at Maryland Entomology Society member meetings.
Once upon a time it took an illustrator to produce this clarity.
Tiny hairs and pits could not be photographed with enough definition. It was a time consuming art.
Your photos now fill the bill.
Ever think of a second career?(joke). I never. Enjoy retirement.
One of your best efforts.
Now, hope this is not Trochoferus campestris (field dweller, ??).
An invasive that likes apple, cherry, and peach trees amongst others.
If it is, the authorities might like to know. Post a full body photo.
I would like to know, too.
Hope things are settling into your new routine.
Say hello to your house guest for me, Gary.
Bill
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 13:36:00   #
relbugman wrote:
I have been taking pictures of rudedral (roadside) plants during my stay in Picayune, MS. Among the ones found were these Pitcher plants. Bob


Nice work. Beautiful, unusual plants.
In Garret Co., MD there is S. purpurea. May be a total of a dozen or less known to exist (to my knowledge). Not many left.
Locations kept secret.
Seems collectors are taking (illegally) them.
I go to a bird sanctuary where there are THREE known specimens.
Thanks for the post.
Bill
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 13:26:51   #
kpmac wrote:
A wasp on water.


Tho it may not be the case here, many hive living bees and wasps will land on water to drink.
Thev hover just above the water and drop spread legged to the surface.
Seven 'dimples' will be seen. One is the proboscis, six footprints.
Water is used to cool nests.
Can be seen while one is lounging at poolside with a cold one in August.
Bill
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 12:11:09   #
sippyjug104 wrote:
This is the beetle that I came across last week that I staged for another session with a different degree of magnification and a bit different view.

I made some changes to the settings of the camera and I wanted to perform a test to evaluate the result so rather than throw it away when finished I thought I'd put it in a post.


Still need dorsal and lateral shots.
Bill
Go to
Jul 12, 2020 11:45:41   #
amfoto1 wrote:
You probably mean a Canon M5 or M50. There's no such thing as an "M 5D".

There are "5D", full frame DSLRs... but if you are looking at getting the camera with 15-45mm lens, it has to be one of the crop sensor (APS-C) M-series mirrorless (there is no Canon 15-45mm lens for any of the DSLRs... they're typically sold with an 18-55mm or a more premium 18-135mm).

I recently got an M5 and really like it. Yes, it is a mirrorless camera (as are the M50, M6 Mark II and M100 models that Canon currently offers).

DO NOT get the EF-S 18-200mm lens. That lens is for the DSLRs and while it's possible to adapt it for use on the M-series mirrorless, there are better options.

There is a Tamron 18-200mm Di III VC lens available for use on Canon M-series. But I would try to steer you away from that, too. There is a less expensive, and likely better option.

The EF-M 15-45mm lens that typically comes with the camera serves as a "mildly wide to very short telephoto" zoom. If you want a more powerful telephoto, why not get the EF-M 55-200mm. It's smaller, lighter, less expensive than the Tamron 18-200mm. It might even offer better image quality. I found some reviews of the Tamron 18-200mm Di III... But none gave any standardized image quality tests. Unfortunately the site where I usually compare image quality test shots hasn't done a series with it. They have tested the older Tamron 18-200mm for DSLRs, which wasn't particularly good. The Canon EF-M 55-200mm has noticeably better image quality at all the focal lengths they share. But the newer Tamron 18-200mm III might use different optical formula and be improved... I don't know. But that sort of very broad ranging zoom usually compromises in a lot of ways. A less extreme zoom like the 55-200mm is likely to have much better image quality.

The Canon EF-M 55-200mm IS STM lens sells for $349.

The Tamron 18-200mm Di III VC zoom sells for $499.

Yes, you can get an adapter that allows Canon FD lenses to be used on the M-series cameras. They will be manual focus AND fully manual aperture ONLY. Look for an "FD to EF-M" adapter.

As you stop the lens down, the viewfinder will dim down along with it (the adapted lens is not maintained open until the moment of exposure, the way modern lenses are). This is okay because the electronic viewfinder of the M5 gives you "exposure preview" and will allow you to see to focus. It also has "focus peaking", where objects that are in focus are outlined in a color to help with manual focus (you can choose yellow, red or blue.... and can change it for different situations... I use yellow most of the time).

You can use the camera in fully Manual exposure mode with adapted lenses. You also can get auto exposure using Aperture Priority (Av) mode. In that mode you choose the ISO, select the aperture and the camera determines what shutter speed to use, based upon it's metering system. (The M5 has an Exposure Compensation dial on the top right, that you'll want to learn to use with auto exposure modes.) It also is possible to get auto exposure setting the camera to M (manual) and enabling Auto ISO (simply dial the ISO setting all the way down past 100, until "A" appears). Even though it's Manual, once Auto ISO is enabled it becomes an AE mode, too. And this also works with adapted vintage lenses. In M + Auto ISO mode, you select both the aperture and the shutter speed, while the camera choose what ISO to use, based upon it's metering system.

With adapted manual aperture lenses you CANNOT use Shutter Priority AE (Tv), Program (P), full "Auto" or any of the "Scene" modes ("sports", "scenic", "portrait", etc.)

IMPORTANT: To use an adapted manual aperture lens on the camera, you MUST go into the menu and set the camera to "shoot without lens". By default the camera won't want to release the shutter when it doesn't detect an electronically controlled lens installed. The adapted lenses (as well as some modern manual focus/manual aperture lenses) aren't "recognized" by the camera. But they work just fine once you make this setting.

Your EF-M lenses such as the 15-45mm and 55-200mm will be usable in all the exposure modes, recognized by the camera and you will use the dials and buttons on the camera to change settings. Auto focus will also work, of course. (You should read up on the camera's AF settings. For example, you can set it up so that moving your finger on the rear LCD screen will change the selected AF point. To keep your nose from changing the selection, you can restrict this to one quadrant of the LCD screen... I'd recommend the upper right since that falls right under your thumb while you are holding the camera with your eye in the viewfinder.)

You're likely to want at least one spare battery. The electronic viewfinder is a neat feature, but it draws a lot of power, so you don't get many shots per charge. The LP-E17 battery isn't cheap, but no one makes them other than Canon. So there's no real alternative. They work well and can be recharged hundreds of times, so it's almost a one-time purchase.

You also will need some SD memory cards. I recommend good quality 16GB or 32 GB. There are larger cards available, but using one of those is like putting all your eggs in one basket. If the card fails (rarely happens) or you lose it (happens more often)... or you forget and leave it in a pocket of a pair of jeans that get laundered (happens, but usually doesn't damage the card)... it can be a real disaster if you have a really big card with many days or weeks worth of images on it! That's why I carry four to six smaller memory cards per camera, rather than a single really big one in each. I shoot RAW (larger file sizes) with M5 and get close to 900 images on a 32GB memory card. JPEGs would get even more per card.

The two lenses you're considering will be great to start with. Later you might want others... just don't add too many too fast. Have some fun adapting your vintage lenses, too. BTW, because the M5 is an APS-C "crop" camera, your vintage lenses will "act longer" than you remember. For example, a 50mm will be a "short telephoto" instead of a "normal" lens. A wide lens will no longer be very wide.... A 21mm will "act like" a much less wide 35mm lens (approx.). But telephotos will be "more powerful".... A 200mm will "act like a 320mm" did on your film camera.

If you ever want a wider lens, check out the Canon EF-M 11 -22mm. It's a great lens! It's the sharpest of any of the ultrawide zooms Canon makes for crop sensor cameras (which is saying a lot, because the EF-S 10-18mm and EF-S 10-22mm for the DSLRs are among the best anyone makes).

There aren't a whole lot of EF-M lenses anyway. Canon currently offers 7 or 8 of them. Sigma just introduced a 16mm (wide), 30mm (normal) and 56mm (short telephoto) that are among the first from a 3rd party manufacturer with autofocus that appear to be excellent. Tamron just makes the one lens (18-200mm). There are a bunch of manual focus only... and a HUGE selection of vintage lenses that can easily be adapter and used as described above.

So far I've been working with four manual focus/manual aperture lenses....

12mm f/2.8 Meike
21mm f/2.0 Rokinon
50mm f/1.1 Kanlan
90mm f/2.5 Tamron (vintage, macro)

I may add the 11-22mm and some other autofocus lenses in the future (I had forgotten how HARD it is to manually focus ).

EDIT: I just saw your followup that you have a couple older Canon DSLRs. The crop of the M5 will be the same as those, but the newer M5 has much higher resolution sensor. Also, any lenses you have for those cameras probably can be adapted for use on the M5. Canon themselves make an EF/EF-S to EF-M adapter, but there good 3rd party manufactured available for a lot less $. I said "probably" above because while all Canon EF or EF-S lenses will adapt and work fine... Not all older model 3rd party lenses work properly when adapted. Most are fine. But some won't focus or have other "glitches".

Good luck with your purchase!
You probably mean a Canon M5 or M50. There's no su... (show quote)


Wow, a lot to digest. My current plan is to buy an adapter and use my many FD lenses.
28-400, mostly primes.
And at present I believe I have an option on the Konica lenses advertised in buy/sell/ trade.
If successful I will look for a proper adaptor.
I DO NOT have plans to buy new lenses.
Thanks to you and all who answered.
And the seller is 'anxious'.
I smell a realy good deal.
Wednesday will tell.
Thank you and all who responded.
Bill
Go to
Jul 11, 2020 22:00:57   #
docshark wrote:
Hey Bill, Headed to Idlewild with the retired Ent. guys from Univ. of Delaware. What did you find?
-Doc


I got a hodgepodge of shots. Not culled.
One unusual find. A Cow Killer looked to be stinging monarch caterpillars.
Hoping those shots are clear. Tomorrow.
Can't remember where we parked, no one else there.
Goodnight, Doc, all.
Bill
Go to
Jul 11, 2020 21:47:27   #
newtoyou wrote:
Am about to pick up a Canon EOS M 5D. With the 15-45 kit lens and an expensive Canon (explains the expensive, $75 for the Canon logo) carrying case and batteries, etc.
And an 18-200 mm " over $1000 foot long lens".
The deal is a good one if the camera and lenses are what I expect.
His reference is a mutual friend.
Money may exchange hands Wednesday when I get a hands on look.
My questions:
Is this a mirrorless? It seems to be in the specs, but double checking.
That means my many Canon FD lenses will work with an adapter?
Last, what is your opinion of this camera?
I am not looking for comparisons, but info on this camera.
Thank you
Bill
Am about to pick up a Canon EOS M 5D. With the 15-... (show quote)


Thanks, all.
What I learned so far is that I still, and will, have a lot to learn.
I have gear that I am selling, a T2I and a XSI. Make room and money at same time.
Thanks again, I'll still be watching this post. Seems I made a good choice.
More Wednesday.
Bill
Go to
Jul 11, 2020 21:37:59   #
cahale wrote:
To what are you wishing to conform?


I caught that too late.
Was married to a teacher, too.
Confirm was intended.
But you knew that.
Bill
Go to
Jul 11, 2020 15:12:02   #
docshark wrote:
Beautiful set Gary. Of course I'm partial to your fine dragon shots.
-Doc


Lo, Doc.
Greetings from Idlewild WMA.
Hello, all.
Bill
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... 223 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.