Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: CaptainPhoto
Page: <<prev 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21 next>>
Nov 4, 2018 07:59:55   #
GENorkus wrote:
Photographers seem to be infatuated with a camera's ability to have as many shots per second as possible. But why when for most it just means you need a huge memory card then lots of time in post processing just to cull the batch down to a manageable amount.

In several videos of nature and events, it becomes obvious to me the person only wanted one shot here or there. After all, how many shots of a bird popping or a bride and groom in a lip-lock position does anyone need? Then I hear the camera taking at least three shots and often more.

Thinking about that, I realized a photographer can't react fast enough to only take just one shot. Everytime they push the button, two or three shots fired off before lifting their finger off the button.

For those rare times a burst it really needed, why not just repush the button a few times. I've seen some generation "Z" people with very fast fingers!
Photographers seem to be infatuated with a camera'... (show quote)


I was at the local zoo shooting the baby cub lions. I was using burst mode. When I go home a started to post process them I had some shots I never realized I had gotten. If I had not used burst mode, I would never have gotten that perfect shot. Sure I deleted a bunch, I had a bucket full of pixels, but I got the shot I wanted. Burst ON
Go to
Oct 31, 2018 09:29:40   #
As long as this post is on the Wacom tablet. Can anyone recommend some good tutorials for the Wacom tablet? This device is not really all that intuitive.
Go to
Oct 22, 2018 11:49:09   #
SharpShooter wrote:
WHY do professionals want to go ML? What professionals??
How many pros do you know have gone ML?
There is one guy here that wherever he shoots, everybody is using ML but that is NOT my experience!!!
I do see the guys shooting video using steady-cams using ML 4/3!
SS


I don't recall the professional photographer's name, but there was an article about the Olympus 4/3 mirrorless camera by a National Geographic photographers who switched to the Olympus system. He was using it in some really challenging environments and he really liked it. The camera performed well. I switched to Olympus mirrorless last year and really love the camera. Sold all my Canon cameras and lenses to afford the new Olympus. Not sure I would want a new Canon mirrorless, being that it would be the same size as the DSLR basically. One of the main reasons why I switched was to lighten the load and size.
Go to
Oct 16, 2018 15:26:48   #
toxdoc42 wrote:
check your homeowners/rental insurance, if you carried coverage for the camera as part of a property insurance, that may cover the cost!~


Most homeowner insurance coverages only cover - theft or fire things of that nature, may be lost or stolen, but not drop or breakage. And Square Trade or the other drop and breakage insurance's don't cover fire - theft, and loss. So that is why I carry both. Homeowners for the fire, etc and Newleaf for the drop and breakage. When you have good equipment it pays to have insurance. Some homeowners my cover breakage, but best to check with our carrier.
Go to
Oct 13, 2018 08:57:20   #
gvarner wrote:
What subjects would look better in each, or does it make a difference? Assume the target subject can be photographed in either. I would be interested in your preference. Thanks. I'm thinking that each has its own special quality.


I think it's a good question. My thoughts are, go out and shoot the scene in the morning and then shoot the same scene at sunset (yea I know the sun is on the other side) and see which one you like the best. After all, it's what you like that counts. And I would venture to say that if you shot a morning scene and sunset, you could post process them to where you really couldn't tell when it was shot. So go forth and shoot to your hearts desire and have fun.
Go to
Oct 13, 2018 08:48:02   #
DaveO wrote:
It is quite easy to estimate how much revenue a state loses due to internet sales. While we do not like taxes, the revenues of forty five states include a sales or use tax. I'm simply saying that the lost revenue will have to be collected via another method if sales tax collections are allowed to be decimated.


My experience with B &H and Adorma is that I can call and talk to them or do a live chat and get all the technical advice I need to make a intelligent decision on what I want to buy. They have experts in whatever brand and type of equipment you want to buy. You don't have to talk to just one person that has limited knowledge. So many of the photography stores have gone out of business in many towns that you have to turn to on-line buying or travel a great distance. And with the price of gas going up, there would be no savings.
Go to
Oct 13, 2018 08:37:08   #
Bruce Moore wrote:
I have a Canon 550d (T2i) and various lenses. I am considering swapping systems to a mirrorless set up and wondered what people's thought were in terms of the timing of such a switch and which system to go with. I have been reading about the Fuji xt3 and it intrigues me but I am an amateur photographer and it is more expensive than my Canon system. I am considering switching to reduce weight and because mirrorless looks like the future of hobbyist photography.


If your not looking to spend a lot of money and still want a good mirroless, try the Sony A6000. Got a really good deal at Best Buy. I have it and really like it. Light, nice lenses and produces good quality images. I had lots of Canon equipment and really liked the idea of a really good mirrorless so I sold all the Canon stuff and bought the Olympus E-M1 MK II and just love the camera and all the lenses. I did go with the f2.8 pro lenses, not cheap, but hay at my age this may be the last camera I buy so I went for it.
Go to
Oct 9, 2018 08:43:16   #
will47 wrote:
If I intend to convert an image to B&W, when would I use denoise if it was necessary? Before conversion (while still in color) or after conversion to B&W? When would I denoise if I do not use either Siver Efex or Topaz and decide to do the conversion straight up in PS? Thanks.


Take a look at the image in LR - Detail Panel. First work with removing any Color Noise then remove any Luminance Noise, after that do any Sharpening that may be needed. Then make all your basic Globel and Local adjustments while still in color. Then convert to B&W. You can do this in LR using the B&W option in the Basic-Treatment Panel. Check out the LR presets for B&W or the Profiles on the right panel if you have LR Classic. Explore the B&W Mix Panel after you select B&W in the Treatment Panel. You can also try NIK Silver Effects Pro - it does a great job also. After you make your first B&W adjustments, make a print and see how it turns out. Once you see it in print form you may want to go back and make some more adjustments. Creating a good B&W is not a one-step process. B&W is lots of fun. Enjoy the process.
Go to
Oct 4, 2018 09:36:39   #
I have used UV filters on all my lenses. I have heard all the pro's and con's. I had a large scratch show up on one lens with a UV filter. Not sure how it happened, but it did. I was sure glad it was just the filter that took the hit and not the lens itself. It saved the day. I agree, lens caps help, but you still have to take the lens cap off to shoot. So now all that protection is gone. Do I want to keep taking the lens cap on and off everytime I want to take a shot while out shooting? Don't think so. The lens hood is a great form of protection - I fully agree. As I recall I did have the lens hood on that particular lens and the filter still got scratched. Go figure. Just glad I had the UV filter on.
Go to
Sep 26, 2018 08:39:55   #
Shooting in JPEG is never going to give you the control in PP. If you think you need JPEG for some reason (quick show and tell) then shoot in RAW and JPEG.

This photo was shot in RAW - PP in Lightroom and exported in JPEG. The metadata is: Spot Metered, ISO 400, 1/1000, f/5.9, Focal length 350mm with my Olympus 4/3rds camera. I focused on the bird in flight (spot metered) so I would expose for the bird, not the sky.


(Download)


(Download)
Go to
Sep 24, 2018 09:58:57   #


Thanks so much for the great links. They answered my questions to a "T". Really like the article with the calculators.
Go to
Sep 23, 2018 09:37:41   #
Redrocks wrote:
I am interested to know of others experience with Printerpix as a source of metal printing. I should have known better, but I purchased a metal print using "Groupon" (I know... you get what you pay for!!!). I sent in a high quality image to Printerpix for the metal print as per the Groupon. It took over 5 weeks to receive the print. What I received was the most gosh-awful quality, thin metal, bent-up print that man has ever witnessed. I am not a picky person, but this print was awful. I have tried to contact the company to complain and am waiting a reply. I had an identical print done by Bay Photo and the metal print was excellent. Has anyone else ever used Printerpix
and what was your experience?
I am interested to know of others experience with ... (show quote)


I did just what you did a few months ago. Did the Groupon thing and ordered two 16 x 20 metal prints. They came in a normal time, but the first set had blotches of ink, scratches on both prints. I contacted them by email and they had me send them pictures of the problem. They did replace them for free and free shipping. The second set came with problems on the one print. I emailed them again and they had me send them photos of the problem. They sent me a replacement. The third replacement they replaced both prints, not just the one. Even though I got replacement prints the quality of the metal prints is not very good. It's a strange looking color to the prints, almost like a hologram looking effect. Nothing I really wanted to hang on my wall. I turned around and ordered metal prints from Shutterfly with a 50% coupon and got exactly want I wanted. The metal prints from Shutterfly came with the hanging blocks already on the metal prints. The hanging blocks form Printerpix were loose in the box and you had to mount them yourself, risking bending the metal. No thank you. I will never order from Printepix ever again.
Go to
Sep 23, 2018 09:23:16   #
First time I've seen this topic. Very informative.

Rather than spend $150-to $200 on a dehumidifier case I oped for the Desiccant Packets(Rechargeable) from Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Packets-Premium-Silica-Desiccant-Dehumidifiers/dp/B073DJSRTT/ref=sr_1_1_sspa?ie=UTF8&qid=1537708007&sr=8-1-spons&keywords=desiccant&psc=1

For $11.00 I get 50 packs plus some cards. I can put them in each lens bag and in my camera bag. What I like about them is that they change color when they start to absorb moisture. Then change them out and they are rechargeable in the microwave. A win-win situation for just $11.00
Go to
Sep 18, 2018 09:32:11   #
Try Topaz Studio - AI Clear does even better then DeNoise.
Go to
Aug 31, 2018 09:24:25   #
mwsilvers wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I've already gotten off the Adobe bandwagon. I now use DXO Photolab Elite and ON1.


I use ON 1 - and LR and PS. ON 1 is a fairly new post processing software, but guess what, it is going to go the same way as other software, they will upgrade and upgrade and add new features and somewhere down the line your old Windows 7 will no longer work, the same way with Nik and Topaz. Are all those Windows 8 and XP users still driving cars with carburetors and distributors and points. Electronic ignition and fuel injection has been around a long time. So why not get on the band wagon and upgrade your computer technology?
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ... 21 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.