TriX wrote:
I have not. I would consider the R5 a substantial upgrade, but going backwards on resolution, not so much. BUT the R6 has many things going for it if you don’t need the resolution including IBIS, weight, frame rate, EVF and more AF points. BTW the DR and low light/high ISO performance of the two is almost identical.
I'd rather have the resolution. The other things you mentioned are of little or no consequence for me.