Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: billnikon
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 ... 1188 next>>
Aug 13, 2015 07:14:06   #
jerryc41 wrote:
There's a difference between returning something that's defective and something you just don't want. If it was Amazon's fault, they will pay for you to drop it in a UPS box or have UPS pick it up. If it's your fault, there will be a deduction in the amount of the refund. If UPS picks it up, there will be a greater deduction.

I knew I had a UPS delivery coming, so even though I said I would put the pkg in a UPS drop box, I decided to wait for UPS to arrive. The next day, I gave the package to the driver, and when I got the refund, there was a deduction for UPS pickup. I saved myself a ten-mile drive, but I had to pay. That's reasonable.
There's a difference between returning something t... (show quote)


My wife bought a pair of shoes from Amazon. They did not fit properly. They sent me a return paid shipping label and I sent them back. Nice.
Go to
Aug 13, 2015 07:12:02   #
Mogul wrote:
How about "the greater of Actual Shipping Charges (paid by Adorama) or a 15% Restocking Fee"; in any of my transactions, I would have had no basis for complaint!


You guys obviously have never run a business. For a profit that is.
Go to
Aug 12, 2015 07:52:57   #
terrild53 wrote:
I just checked the shutter count on my almost 3 year old T3i and it has 13,075 clicks. The camera works great and it has served me well. I'm just wondering, what is the life of a camera of this caliber? Do I have another 1-2 years left on it? I just don't know about this type of thing. Thanks for any info!


Cannot speak for that camera, a friend who works for several school photographers taking pictures of students for student records uses Nikon 7000's. He said that one 7000 went 375,000 (and this one is used by a couple dozen people) and is still going, another one gave up the ghost around 200,000. I hope we all live long enough to put that many exposures on one camera. I usually trade up about every three years so I guess I will never come close.
Go to
Aug 12, 2015 07:44:59   #
Genessi wrote:
Nikon N65 like new plus minolta lens

.
Very nice paper weights. Just kidding, Ebay would be a good starting point for sales, usually you get a little more than selling to a camera store. (it would be easier to sell as a group to a store, and less trouble for you) You get the mark up, not the store. I would sell the Minolta lenses one at a time. The prices will not be high so make sure you charge for shipping. Or, considering the demand will not be high and the money you make may not be high. The paper weight idea would not be out of the question. Love the retro strap on the Minolta film camera, takes me back to the good old days of film and Kodachrome.
Go to
Aug 12, 2015 07:39:01   #
Dana C wrote:
I need some opinions about using this lens primarily for outdoor high school sports. During spring and early fall, I shoot soft ball and in the early fall, football. Naturally the softball natural lighting is good as it is always played in the late afternoon around 4:00PM. Fall football at least late summer / early fall usually is lit well. After the light comes on I switch to my 80-200 two ring f2.8.
I now that the image quality is fine for this but I want to know if this is a good choice. The 80-200 is great but sometimes doesn't have quite the reach and at 80 I can't frame well in the infield on occasionl. Since for a while I will be a single body shooter w/ a D7000, I don't want to make a mistake
Feel free to offer other options as well.
Thanks,
Dana
I need some opinions about using this lens primari... (show quote)


I used to shoot for a school district in Ohio. Used the 80-200 exclusively for football, soccer, volleyball, basketball, and yes, worked great for baseball. You have presets on that lens, set one for first, second, and third base. Never missed the action. The faster lenses tend to focus faster, that's why I mostly stuck with the 80-200. Buy the way, I used full frame, that's why I was fine on the wide end. You may consider a fast, inexpensive 50 1.8 which would give you the 80 with your camera. Their is no substitute for speed when it comes to sports. Good luck.
Go to
Aug 11, 2015 15:41:05   #
Bogin Bob wrote:
I can see you need stability and have it!
Thanks


Most camera tripods have a great UNDER standing.
Go to
Aug 11, 2015 06:19:15   #
revhen wrote:
Off to Ireland we go in September, the island of my wife's ancestors. Just discovered that September is traditionally the rainiest month there. So I'm concerned about the rain-on-the-camera problem. My main camera is a Canon 70D with the old 18-135 lens. The 70D is supposed to be somewhat water resistant but the lens may leak like a sieve. Would appreciate any suggestions for protection under such conditions. Now I also have a Nikon Coolpix 100 which you can shoot underwater. (I'm a true believer but I can happily worship in different churches depending on the occasion ) :lol:
Please let me know your wisdom in the matter. Thanks.
Off to Ireland we go in September, the island of m... (show quote)


UMBRELLA
Go to
Aug 11, 2015 06:14:52   #
Bogin Bob wrote:
I have learned (from mistakes) the importance of a tripod in certain situations. Since I probably could use a tripod in one in ten photo shoots, I would be interested in the UHH members recommendation for one under $200. I would like to keep weight under 5 pounds. I do not use long telephoto lenses or heavy weight lens on my Nikon D5100 or A6000. I assume a basic ball head is best over swivel/pan head. A group member suggested Slik tripods.

Recommendations requested.
Thank you.


In my opinion, check out the Induro AT413 tripod, yes, it costs slightly over $200.00, but not much, and, you will have to get a head, but for the money, it is one of the best values out there. I comes with a nice carrying cast and a industry leading warranty, and tools. It is very sturdy, will last you a lifetime and you will not regret it for one minute.
Go to
Aug 11, 2015 06:06:50   #
rmolson wrote:
Best camera, lens etc

There is a legend which may or may not be true. That in the 50's when Photo Illustration was in it's hey day in New York. The studios they ran were the latest in high tech and techniques. The photographers famous for their pictures. They held a annual photo contest. The only requirement being the picture had to be taken with an ordinary box camera on black and white roll film. It is said the resulting pictures were every bit as great as their commercial work. Proving that it is the photographer not the equipment that make the pictures. Spend more time studying great art and pictures instead of getting another lens or camera. That will help you improve your pictures.
Best camera, lens etc br br There is a legend whi... (show quote)


While in college I took a class back when 4X5 cameras were used, the professor marked the negative and we were given one negative and his assignment. In other words, we had one shot to get it right. You would not believe the aggravation. But it taught me to look, compose, evaluate, look at all the composition rules, exposure, etc. It was a very effective teaching technique. And, with digital equipment, I can now really blast away, sorry professor.
Go to
Aug 10, 2015 11:47:24   #
Raz Theo wrote:
I was recently told by a pro photog I respect, that regarding landscapes (and maybe other scenarios), there was little difference in DSLRs, regardless of $$$ when certain criteria were observed:
1) Use of a tripod; 2) F-stop "sweet-spot" (f-8); 3) Manual focus and 4) use of shutter release cable.
Is his message is too simple?


The difference is not in the camera, it is in the photographer.
Go to
Aug 10, 2015 08:16:17   #
Ultra-Man wrote:
I was wondering if any of you fellow Hoggers could help me out. I was asked to lead a photowalk but I'm not sure what is involved.


Generally, you lead from the front. ie. You make the decisions on theme, hints, examples of what to do. Go in advance and check the area out. Check with local rangers if available, take sample photo's. In other words, plan your work and then work your plan. Simple.
Go to
Aug 10, 2015 08:06:29   #
MMC wrote:
Does anybody have expirience buying camera in this store?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/Nikon-D750-Digital-SLR-Camera-Body-Brand-New-Full-Frame-DSLR-1-Year-Warranty-/151429087219?hash=item2341e07ff3
What do you know or think about their 1 year warranty?


I just purchased myD750 from a authorized dealer. Most of the Ebay stuff comes with a 1 year warranty but NOT FROM NIKON USA. Which means you cannot get it serviced by NIKON USA. These folks have their own servicing department. IE, do not buy these cameras that are gray market, that's why they are cheaper than USA brand. I am very happy with my US D750 cause it is protected by NIKON USA.
Go to
Aug 10, 2015 08:00:54   #
Kuzano wrote:
And very often zooms are the worst, since the zoom action actually creates a vacuum that pulls dust into the lens barrel.


I agree with you on PUSH-PULL zooms. Internally zooming lenses do not necessarily share this problem nearly as much.
Go to
Aug 9, 2015 07:53:58   #
Bushymonster wrote:
Here is the description Sigma EX 50mm 1:2.8 Macro - Canon EF mount Lens..
-Bushy


A lot of things on e-bay have a return policy if you feel the description of the item was misleading or the description does not match the product received. Suggestion, since we live in a digital world, take some shots of a plain white wall or a plain surface, you can then enlarge the shot and see if the dust causes any problems. If you are unhappy in any way notify the seller you wish to return it. If that causes a problem, you can go to the resolution center and get it resolved their. Future suggestion, always look for mint in the box stuff with a 100% rating. Read the reviews of the buyer and what other folks say about them. I have found Ebay to be a great site for my more expensive Nikon glass in Mint condition, with the box. Hope your lens performs well for you.
Go to
Aug 8, 2015 07:29:48   #
Romy klein wrote:
I need some advice and opinions on what lens to keep. I just got a Nikon D-750 and I am thrilled, upgraded from a D-7000 DX. However i am very confused on what all around lens to keep. The 24-120 or 28-300 for my traveling. I own the 70-300 that I used with my dx camera and like it. However now that I have other choices I am a little confused. With my d-7000 I used the 18-200 and 17-55 2.8 dx (that I am selling now), as a walk all around lens and used my 70-300 when I need it. I want to keep the one that will give me the best IQ. I will appreciate your comment. Thanks
I need some advice and opinions on what lens to ke... (show quote)


What you need to do is take each lens out separately, give your self an assignment, shoot only with that lens, then the next day shoot with another lens, feel the balance, the weight in your hands, your 750 is similar in size to your 7000, the 750 slightly fatter. Look at your favorite photo's you have taken in the past, what lens did you take it with? The 24-120 will be now wider at the 24 end because it is no longer on the 7000, but you will notice the lens is not as far reaching as it was, because on the 7000 it went to 180 but now only goes to 120, your 28-300 will give you more reach with the 750. Only you will know what lenses to keep. My 750 was great right out of the box, you will see a difference in enlargements or cropping your photo's with the full frame 750. Good choice on your part. Good luck and good shooting.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176 1177 1178 1179 1180 ... 1188 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.