Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: mrjcall
Page: <<prev 1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 next>>
Jul 17, 2013 18:30:40   #
I could be persuaded! Just wish I had the forsight to have a choice..
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 18:28:29   #
Should understand the reference since I'm an old bass player having played many Goodman tunes. Howsomever, I just don't get the reference so enlighten por favor... :wink:
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 18:00:47   #
Thinking this through, I should've stopped down and tried getting all the droplets on the web in focus to have a choice, eh?
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 17:54:27   #
Ok, agree with that concept, but when the subject is so dispersed like this pix, I'm not sure...
pigpen wrote:
Not at all. I use it all the time. Nothing can make the subject stand out better. :thumbup:
Go to
Jul 17, 2013 17:48:36   #
Anyone have issues with the selective focus in this pix? I can't make up my mind.... :?

Early Morning Dew

Go to
Jun 25, 2013 09:04:13   #
Would dearly love to hear an update on the status on this fabulous Leica 'kit' if possible.....
Go to
Jun 20, 2013 13:57:28   #
Martys wrote:
I have an Epson R2000 that is in excellent and barely used condition.

My wife used it for light office printing.
Too much printer for light office use.
Will include one set of cartridges.
Have orig box and accessories.
Printer is located in Lubec, Maine

Epson info link on R2000 here.....

http://www.epson.com/cgi-bin/Store/jsp/Product.do?BV_UseBVCookie=yes&sku=C11CB35201

PM me if interested, I will get back to you.

Thank you
Marty


I see numerous responses, but you haven't responded. Is it still for sale and, if so, how much :?:
Thanks
Go to
Jun 19, 2013 14:37:27   #
berchman wrote:
Yes, fifty years ago I used a rangefinder, but when I got a Pentax SLR I thought I had died and gone to heaven as far as ability to compose.
Yes, I closed one eye. I was interested in candid shots so I had to be very fast, too fast for me to use a rangefinder, especially when the subject did not lend itself to easily seeing when the split image became one image. I would see a possible shot, bring the camera to my eye very rapidly, take the shot and put the camera down. I did not want to attract the attention of the subject. This method of shooting required me to preset the focus and rely on a smaller lens opening for a reasonable depth of field. Hence, I had to forget about completely blurring the background, easy to do with the Nikon set with a large lens opening.

I do not see how a zoom lens "defeats the genre" of street photography unless one is fanatically devoted to the notion that the only good street photographs are made closeup and with a 35 or 28 mm lens.

I am not troubled by the fact that Leica has its devotees. My review presented my personal feelings about using a rangefinder camera lacking autofocus and zoom lenses for candid street photography.
Yes, fifty years ago I used a rangefinder, but whe... (show quote)


Everyone, no matter how accomplished, should try the exercise of going on a street shoot with only a body and one normal lens, 35 or 50mm. Back in my photojournalism days, that was routine for me and was how I learned all the basic fundamentals. To this day, I still do this exercise every so often... I promise it's worth it! :thumbup: (Note I did use a Leica back then and a hand held light meter)
Go to
Jun 12, 2013 10:01:33   #
jerryc41 wrote:
I hope you mean P&S, right? :D


Most of the time..... :wink:
Go to
Jun 12, 2013 08:14:15   #
Just sayin that I got along fine with my non-viewfinder POS until I found the need for better glass.... I upgraded for the sensor size and glass quality, not because of no viewfinder. Again, both have their uses, but both can work equally well IMHO...
Go to
Jun 12, 2013 08:02:42   #
That is precisely the point. Both approaches have their use and function, eh?
Go to
Jun 12, 2013 07:50:31   #
After reading comments on this topic, I feel the need to chime in. My passion is nature photography and I will tell you clearly that I use the live view LCD screen on my D800 just about as much as the viewfinder. Point being is that I enjoy photographing unusual angles for much of my subject matter. There is no possible way to get your eye to the viewfinder when you place the camera on the ground to get the right shot. I started with a small Lumix POS a few years ago and was worried that I might not adapt to no viewfinder since I come from a film back ground with Leica/Nikon viewfinder cameras as a combat photographer in the Viet Nam era. No problem however and am convinced that there is no appreciable difference in content and quality of what can be produced with either. If I had my druthers, I'd use the viewfinder out of habit, but either works just fine thank you! :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 9, 2013 08:59:10   #
Ha! Made me laugh!!! :lol:

Wahawk wrote:
Kinda like the guy trying to measure a pole that was stuck in the ground but not solid. It kept falling over and he kept setting it back up. Someone asked why he didn't just measure it laying on the ground? He said he already knew how long it was, but he wanted to know how TALL it was.
Go to
Dec 26, 2012 13:42:18   #
Thanks for all the kind comments. Luck is certainly involved with the 'right time/right place' thing, but the key is to be ready, eh? :thumbup:
JC
Go to
Dec 25, 2012 10:34:20   #
I came upon this beautiful Great Blue Heron suddently and when he (she) saw me and raised it's leg, it fluttered down to the water below it's perch. Unfortunately it happened to be frozen over and it skidded on it's claws flapping all the way. By the time I could get the next shot off (not set on burst mode), it had risen up and started to fly off across the partially frozen lake and swear it was watching me the whole time! :) The pix are the sequence described....

Pix were shot with my D800, Nikkor 28mm-300mm F3.5 zoom at 300mm, between 1/250 and 1/1000, F8, ISO 400










Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.