berchman wrote:
Yes, fifty years ago I used a rangefinder, but when I got a Pentax SLR I thought I had died and gone to heaven as far as ability to compose.
Yes, I closed one eye. I was interested in candid shots so I had to be very fast, too fast for me to use a rangefinder, especially when the subject did not lend itself to easily seeing when the split image became one image. I would see a possible shot, bring the camera to my eye very rapidly, take the shot and put the camera down. I did not want to attract the attention of the subject. This method of shooting required me to preset the focus and rely on a smaller lens opening for a reasonable depth of field. Hence, I had to forget about completely blurring the background, easy to do with the Nikon set with a large lens opening.
I do not see how a zoom lens "defeats the genre" of street photography unless one is fanatically devoted to the notion that the only good street photographs are made closeup and with a 35 or 28 mm lens.
I am not troubled by the fact that Leica has its devotees. My review presented my personal feelings about using a rangefinder camera lacking autofocus and zoom lenses for candid street photography.
Yes, fifty years ago I used a rangefinder, but whe... (
show quote)
Everyone, no matter how accomplished, should try the exercise of going on a street shoot with only a body and one normal lens, 35 or 50mm. Back in my photojournalism days, that was routine for me and was how I learned all the basic fundamentals. To this day, I still do this exercise every so often... I promise it's worth it! :thumbup: (Note I did use a Leica back then and a hand held light meter)