alphadog wrote:
and WHY would you say that? I don't do a LOT of post processing
Because I see an image taken at ISO800 with absolutely no sign of noise when viewed at max size. That suggests noise removal has likely been undertaken and possibly globally, reducing detail on the subject.
alphadog wrote:
My goal here was to obtain the least expensive PRIME lens combo that would produce excellence.
The D500 + Nikon 500mm PF, purchased used achieves this result.
Mission accomplished, for me anyway. I have NO desire to delve into the Z or R bodies and ridiculously expensive matching PRIME lenses... younger folks can still find bargains in the prime f4 lenses, which tend to be heavier, imo.
This is day 2 of my D500 test. This morning one hawk helped me out. I reduced the size so the pic would not be so large.
My goal here was to obtain the least expensive PRI... (
show quote)
The more I look at your images posted I suspect your post processing is not doing them justice.
rehess wrote:
Just listen to their blather.
Your imagination exceeds your love of Pentax.
PMM PHOTOGRAPHY wrote:
I have noticed that my Ruggard Electronic Dry Cabinet has developed a distinctive interior odor.
Have no idea what the issue may be and/or how to correct it.
Could this be a sign that the unit is no longer operating?
Any feedback and suggestions would be most helpful
You have not mentioned what the digital readout is indicating, if it's not showing a reading have you checked the power supply to the unit?
Does the equipment feel cooler than the surrounding ambient when you take it out?
selmslie wrote:
What I can't find is any evidence that you have ever used a raw conversion program on your computer.
25 pages for it to now reach the 'absurd' comments.
Many thanks for the above responses. I'll not answer each due to time shortage as shortly off to have my first attempt.
Along with the above, some web research and a single trial using my dog I've come to the following conclusion. I'll start with 1080p (H.264/AVC (8 bit), MP4) with my priority being attaining good focus on subject and seeing how steady my results are using a monopod.
I've managed a quick test using the dog walking towards me, used 60fps and found how to slow this to half speed just using PS. Whilst PS may be restricted, at least I can get an idea of the quality of results for my first trial. As for sound, this will not be necessary.
As for focus I've tried a couple of the options and expect to just use 'small or wide area' with face/eye recognition although there's also 'subject tracking' I want to possibly investigate.
Depending on results I'll then decide whether to move forward, considering possible difficulties undertaking both stills, which are the priority, plus some video.
Whilst I've been using a Z6 and Z8 for photographing race events I've never used the video function and want to try it tomorrow at a short non important race along with testing of my new 70-200S. Browsing the manual, confusing myself and trying to learn how to do things I have a couple of basic video questions that advice from the video shooters will hopefully assist.
The scenario for the video use ...........................
Subjects will be coming towards me, wish to keep subject face in focus, and I would like to produce slow motion snips to compile together later. I have LR/PS/NX Studio. The video would be produced for viewing on social media, e.g. facebook only.
Q1 - The manual lists numerous video formats, which would be best to use for above scenario?
(I assume non-raw video)
7680 x 4320 (8K UHD): 30p (progressive)/25p/24p
3840 x 2160 (4K UHD): 120p/100p/60p/50p/30p/25p/24p
1920 x 1080: 120p/100p/60p/50p/30p/25p/24p
________________________________________________
(RAW video)
8256 x 4644: 60p/50p/30p/25p/24p
5392 x 3032: 60p/50p/30p/25p/24p
4128 x 2322: 120p/100p/60p/50p/30p/25p/24p
3840 x 2160: 120p/100p/60p/50p
_____________________________________________
File format
NEV, MOV, MP4
_____________________________________________
Video compression
N-RAW (12 bit), Apple ProRes RAW HQ (12 bit), Apple ProRes 422 HQ (10 bit), H.265/HEVC (8 bit/10 bit), H.264/AVC (8 bit)
Q2 - Which AF mode is likely to give the best result at attaining focus on one subject.
At present the camera video settings are in the default mode from the factory but I'd like to get this set up in the short time available to give me something useable to assess if I will consider some video at future main events.
keywest305 wrote:
So I entered into the mirrorless world with the Z9 and my question is for anyone who used the f-mount lens with the adapter on the Z camera. Is there really a difference that's worth selling my F mount 70-200 2.8 and 105 1.4 e to get Z mount glass.
I'm a Z8 user who has just replaced my 70-200mm F mount with the 70-200mmS Z mount. Whilst there is likely an improvement in IQ what is more noticeable is the reduction of lens noise and apparent faster focusing. In addition the combination VR is superior.
I would suggest it very much comes down to what you photograph and how often, I shoot race events and fast focus is important with respect to results, it's also my most used lens. Other not so often used F mount lenses will be retained for use with the FTZ.
Is this a case where a 'bridge camera' should have been used ?
selmslie wrote:
If the lens can display it should be able to pass it to the body.
My old Df can record it. How old is your camera?
It's a Z8 with the Z 70-200. I'm certain as with many lenses this is passed to the body but was surprised the value was not shown in the Exif, not that I would use it.
I recall reading the 'focus distance' often within Exif, but can not recall what specific rigs or even if mine.
selmslie wrote:
It may be in the raw file but not in the JPEG.
It was the raw file that i checked.