Abo wrote:
I made it clear on multiple occasions my only issue was/is this... in italics:
"It’s not the trains responsibility to look out for vehicles or people on the tracks."(sic)
written by the OP in his very first post; creating the thread.
I disagreed with his moronic comment in italics above... nothing more, nothing less.
Then out of the woodwork every half wit and congenitally challenged goomer
attacked me, claiming safety issues, the impossibility of stopping a train, physics, rafts
of horse excrement, physics etc, that I hadn't mentioned or remotely raised the subject of.
By the way, the OP assumes that if you don't mention something, you have not though of it
or done it. By his "reasoning", he does not wipe his fat backside after he takes a dump
because he's failed to mention that in this thread.
And EJMcD, I fulfilled your "hope"... be pleased to know that I have read all the posts in the thread.
However bud, the majority of those posts are mindless dross, and a disturbing
quantity of posts in this thread indicate fence posts have greater cranial capacity and worth,
than many of the authors of the posts you hoped I read.
And all of those in this thread that heartily agreed with what the op wrote,
in italics near the top of this post, please know,
you are part of the "disturbing quantity".
And please, don't make me respond to jokes about a train
being able, or not, to have "responsibility" as the OP illiterately has it.
I made it clear on multiple occasions my only issu... (
show quote)
If you choose to walk on train tracks, ignore or bypass signals and crossing gates, or set up your tripod in the middle of the tracks, no one is responsible for your dumb ass being scattered over the countryside but you!