Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: rmalarz
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 3373 next>>
Apr 3, 2023 09:49:59   #
I approach shooting digitally the same as I did with film. The only photographs are those which I want to frame. For example, one trip to The Grand Canyon resulted in 5 photographs. Another resulted in no photographs within the canyon but a lovely storm forming over the San Francisco Peaks.
--Bob
gvarner wrote:
When I used film I had to plan ahead. I was limited in money and couldn’t waste shots. No pictures of my dinner. No pictures taken "just because I could". I had to plan ahead and work at it. Film was a limited resource. Digital tends to make me lazy about planning ahead. Your thoughts.
Go to
Apr 3, 2023 08:44:24   #
Having been a practitioner of TZS for over 50 years it took me a couple to figure out how to apply it to digital. Now, almost everything I photograph is done using TZS for my exposure and processing.
--Bob
dpullum wrote:
Works for color, but for BW, it analyzes the shade of gray into zones as in the Ansel Adams zone system. I worked with it years ago. This year it was resurrected by open-source org...
The Zone System is a photographic technique for determining optimal film exposure and development, formulated by Ansel Adams and Fred Archer in 1941. Many man-hours in the darkroom for Ansel Adams's landscapes made him forever famous; few shared his passion and patience.

The 11 zones in Ansel Adams’ system were defined to represent the gradation of all the different tonal values you would see in a black and white print, with zone 5 being middle gray, zone 0 being pure black (with no detail), and zone 10 being pure white (with no detail). Theoretically, each zone represents one f-stop in exposure. You’ll also notice there is then an 11-stop difference between pure black and pure white, with a 7-stop difference between the darkest black with detail and the lightest white with detail."

Wikipedia reports that "In mid-September, 2011, the Light Crafts website went offline without notice. It was reported that Fabio Riccardi, founder of Light Crafts and the primary developer of LightZone, was now working as an Apple.

Good News the zone system was reborn This is especially useful for IR with 720+ nm filter that yields BW images as well as those who love B&W photography. I had it years ago and I started a search... Photoshop has it version that only works in Photoshop. That prompted me to search, I found my old copy in my programs and that gave some direction but I encountered many dead ends until success... I found it and the free download.

"A zone preview at the top of the column divides the image into zones corresponding to these shades of gray. You can use the Zone Mapper to stretch or compress individual tonal ranges, and you will see the changes reflected in both the Zones preview and the image. [Isolates particular zones, shades, as I recall and leaves other zones alone]
By default, the settings are applied to your image globally, but there is also the Regions tool, which allows you to isolate areas of the image and apply corrections only to them. You can draw areas in the form of polygons, splines or Bezier curves."
Works for color, but for BW, it analyzes the shade... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 2, 2023 13:43:44   #
Very nice work. I hope you get back to it and things go smoothly from there.
--Bob
Scouser wrote:
About 25 years ago my wife bought me a woodworking lathe and a set of chisels. I had taken woodwork in high school in the 1950's and was a millwright / machinist until I retired in 2009. According to my wife, I had been telling her for most of our married life, (58yrs tomorrow), just how much fun lathe work was. She decided to put the matter to rest and buy me a lathe of my own.
For a number of reasons, the lathe remained in its un-opened box for many years. Eventually I did get it set up in a spare room and got to work. Results were a bit disappointing at first but I gradually improved, until about 2 years ago when I had a slight mishap. In a split second of less than total concentration, the beast snatched a chisel out of my hands, and threw it back at me. Somehow it wove its way between my fingers, point first, then slapped the back of my hand down onto the lathe bed.
Nothing broken and no stitches needed, but what a mess! It's all healed up with hardly any scars, but I am a bit nervous now and not quite as bold as I used to be. Everything is on hold right now anyway, as I await a replacement part for my obsolescent speed selector.
Looking back, the mishap with the chisel may have been partly because of an earlier mishap 11 years ago. My left forearm was disarticulated when our late stallion bit it off. It was successfully re-attached, but it has left me with a dexterity issue. That's a story for another time.
Hopefully I will have the lathe up and running again some time soon, but meanwhile I have attached a few examples of my bowls.
About 25 years ago my wife bought me a woodworking... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 2, 2023 13:39:33   #
Very nice, Jim. The exposure and composition are quite nice.
--Bob
jim quist wrote:
Canon 1DX3, Canon 300 2.8
Our first spring flower
Go to
Apr 2, 2023 13:36:06   #
Nicely done. Very nice variety.
--Bob
jak86094 wrote:
My trip to South America and Antarctica in January and February provided a wonderful variety of scenery and wildlife to photograph. While I've posted photos of some of the birds, the main focus of the trip, taken on land and from the deck of a cruise ship (see prior posts in the bird photos subdirectory), we also enjoyed wonderful views of the unique scenery and some non-avian wildlife, which I present here.

Fur Seals and Elephant Seals frequent the icy Antarctic, where cold currents foster lots of food. While we didn't see a lot of these pinnipeds, they did show up from time to time. This Fur Seal is shows the ears, long foreflippers, the ability to walk on all fours that demonstrate its closer relationship to Sea Lions than true seals.

I was fascinated by the iceberg that immediately reminded me of Moby Dick, the great white sperm whale in Herman Melville's whaling novel. (I cut off the other end of the iceberg to emphasize the "wholeness" I saw). While we did see Sperm Whales in the Antarctic waters, none of them were white and none were as huge as Melville's creature.

After a day of rain, snow, and fog when we first entered Antarctic waters, we were greeted by glacial, scenic views as we sailed south along the Antarctic Peninsula. I've included several photos of the beautiful but stark scenery, which is disappearing as global warming cuts back the ice fields.

Not really sure which are better swimmers, dolphins or penguins, but both were wonderful sights to behold. These Long-nosed Common Dolphins porpoised in and out of the surface of the icy waters, accompanying our ship for a while before bounding off on their own errands (presumably in search of food).

Fin Whales are the second larges whale species...after the Blue Whale. We saw several species of whale in the cold, southern waters, including a Blue Whale, Fin Whales, Humpbacked Whales, Sperm Whales, and Minke Whales. The icy waters of the Antarctic produce an abundance of krill and fish that attract the whales and other mammals and birds. While we saw a nice variety of whales during our cruise, a couple of weeks before we got there these waters were filled with over a thousand whales of varies species. That would have been fun to see. This photo shows the large, somewhat unique blow hole of the Fin Whale. A baleen whale, a Fin Whale eats up to 2 tons of food each day, taking large volumes of water into their mouths and then straining out krill and other creatures as they force the water out through their baleen. It was fun to watch for whale spouts and try to identify the whale from the spout, which varied in size and form...some being fairly compact and vertical, while others were broader and larger.

I'll probably post one or two more sets of bird photos, but hopefully you'll enjoy these even if you're not into bird photography. If you want to see penguins...see my previous post of just penguins.

jak
My trip to South America and Antarctica in January... (show quote)
Go to
Apr 2, 2023 13:31:25   #
Beautifully captured countryside, Jim. I love the greenery.

By the way, the Hare and Hounds Pub isn't too far from there, in a northeasterly direction. It's at the intersection of Upholland Rd. and Longshaw Old Rd.
--Bob
angler wrote:
..photographed today from Billinge hill just a couple of miles up the road from were i live and looking towards Liverpool docks in the distance
Go to
Apr 2, 2023 13:18:21   #
A good concept but the amount of blown-out areas detracts from the subject.
--Bob
Stephan G wrote:
Racing for the gold. Three tied!
Go to
Mar 30, 2023 21:12:11   #
Bask in the news of the indictment. Being charged/indicted doesn't mean much unless a court trial and guilty verdict follow. So curb your enthusiasm just a tad.
--Bob
Frank T wrote:
Have a nice day!
Go to
Mar 29, 2023 19:36:52   #
Jim,
I always enjoy your sharing of photographs of the areas near your home. They provide a means to travel and see a beautiful part of the world.
--Bob
angler wrote:
…Sheep and all
Go to
Mar 27, 2023 14:08:22   #
I have all of my packages and mail delivered to my USPS Post Office Box. I can't remember the last time I had a shipping/receiving issue.
--Bob
elliott937 wrote:
Since there is now a discussion about UPS, let me give you just one example of how bad USPS is in St. Louis.

I have all my packages delivered to an independent owned hardware store, hence avoiding Porch Pirates. One package to be delivered Saturday by USPS was never delivered. They claim the store was closed during their attempted delivery at 9:30. Interesting since the store was opened at 8AM, and staffed by four employees.

That is typical of USPS here. Maybe it is better where you live.
Bill
Since there is now a discussion about UPS, let me ... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 27, 2023 10:49:38   #
My personal preference has been red.
--Bob
Kevin.M wrote:
I’m going to be going out at night and have read that red or green light is better for your eyes than a white light.
Does anyone have experience with using a red or green light when doing night photography and is it worth investing in colored light for this?

~Kevin
Go to
Mar 24, 2023 20:10:10   #
Boone wrote:
who has done so many nice things for me!!!

His real name is Donald but everyone calls him "Deeder".

Deeder has worked for me many times over the years, and even now that I'm retired (For all intents & purpose) he

still comes around.

Anyway...he rarely excepts money from me. (And others) So one night over a couple of cold ones, I ask him if he

would let me do a Portrait of him. After he listened to what I had to say (And it wasn't easy!) he agreed.

I did the attached Portrait of him earlier this month. He hasn't seen it yet, but he will in a few days.

I assure you...he will "TRY TO PAY ME"...but it will be my turn to "LAUGH & WALK AWAY!

Superb work, Boone.
--Bob
Shoot Specs:

Camera: Nikon D750
Lens: Nikon 24-120, f/4 @ 85 mm.
4 light set up.

Please Note: The white lines on the outer edges of the image, these are "Guidelines For Me" during my mounting procedure. "These Will Not Be Seen" on the final image.

Thanks,
Boone.
who has done so many nice things for me!!! br br ... (show quote)
Go to
Mar 24, 2023 20:05:12   #
Again, with photography, it's knowing your tools and how to best use them. The GigaPan head has a weight limit. So, the lens and camera can't exceed that limit. My first choice is my Nikkor 28~300 on my D800 or D850. Most of my panoramas are shot at around 105-190mm. My choice is based on how much detail I was in the distant portion of the photograph.

The next step is exposure. To increase DOF, I use the smallest f-stop the lens affords. Shutter speed is based on that. (I don't mess with ISO). At that point it's hoped that nature will cooperate and provide very little breeze, etc.
--Bob
Wallen wrote:
Having no experience on it, what makes me wonder is what setting should be used as a baseline?
Surely one focal length would have issues when the subject plane is near vs the far horizon. The overlap might be insufficient.
Go to
Mar 23, 2023 18:48:18   #
I'm addressing your comment, "...but it is old and tired" comment. Four of the six cameras I regularly use are well into their 40s or more, with the oldest being made in 1951, the next in the mid-60s, and the youngest in the early 70s. They work exceptionally well. One of those older cameras shoots both film and digital. Thus my addressing the quote.

Or are you just looking, or hoping your next great photograph will be the result of purchasing a new camera?
--Bob
TommiRulz wrote:
What do you think is going to happen with Micro Four Thirds? Do you think Panasonic and Olympus (or whatever it is called now) are going to continue this format? I have a Lumix G9 that I have used for years and LOVE, but it is old and tired - I don't know whether to replace it or not
Go to
Mar 23, 2023 17:20:10   #
I have and have used the Gigapan setup with very good results. Depending on focal length settings and the desire to spend time stitching, one can accomplish some very detailed panoramic photographs. Favorable weather conditions are also involved.
--Bob
Wallen wrote:
Just happened to land on this again while exploring the net.

Actually 15.95 gigapixel only, or 15,950 megapixels!
Enjoy exploring Machu Picchu with this multi stitched photo.

http://gigapan.com/gigapans/116906

YouTuber Destin of Smarter Everyday helped in creating this image and is hidden amongst the crowd.
A where's wally game for those who like some entertainment.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ... 3373 next>>
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.