Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Gort55
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10
Sep 29, 2016 10:17:40   #
Martino wrote:
I've used various iterations of LR on a number of Macs over the years and was frustrated by how images were stored. I eventually moved to Aperture until Apple dropped thatvin favor of Photos, which just didn't work for me. I moved back to LR and got in an even bigger mess. I then signed up with The Lightroom Queen and got her book - 'the missing FAQs'.
All my problems had been of my own making, and largely due to the way I had images scattered all over my drives in no semblance of order. Using LR, I have moved all those images to an external drive and although not perfect my system now works pretty well. Ideally I should have started with a plan and built my image storage in the way that LR was set up, but I've been taking photos for forty odd years, and digital images for more than 16, so that wasn't an option.
I'd recommend the Lightroom Queen's book and website as she gives you a great insight into how LR works and how to make the best use of the program to get yourself in order!
I recently did a clean install of MacOS Sierra on my iMac and, having kept all my images on an external drive, made the transition relatively simply, with only a small amount of (excellent) help from Adobe support (again to solve problems of my own making!).
LR on a Mac does work well, but I'd recommend Lightroom Queen - no connection with me, other than being a satisfied subscriber.
I've used various iterations of LR on a number of ... (show quote)


Thanks for the Lightroom Queen tip. I'm a PC guy having a time with the way a Mac and Lightroom handle pictures.
Go to
Sep 23, 2016 09:26:16   #
jerryc41 wrote:
When I process my pics, I often lighten them a bit - no big deal. The camera is reading the light and setting it to what it thinks is the correct exposure. If it is consistently off, you can use the +/- exposure compensation. Once you set it, it will stay that way till changed.


I agree. My Nikon D7100 has always been off a little to my eye, so I tweak the exposure compensation on the camera or move the slider in Photoshop.
Go to
Sep 17, 2016 09:35:13   #
jmunny wrote:
I am looking for a reliable source for trading in my Nikon D7000 for a D500. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.


Search E-Bay to get an idea of the cameras going price. I've had good luck selling camera equipment there.
Go to
Sep 11, 2016 08:54:07   #
RKL349 wrote:
Currently I use Nikon DSLR bodies (D610 and D7200) and am not looking to move away from that system. There are times when it is practical to travel with something lighter, and for years it was a Canon G9. About a year and a half ago I purchased a Sony A6000 to try to Replace the G9 with newer technology. For some reason, I could never really get comfortable with the Sony system so I sold it. Now I am looking at the Olympus brand, and either the PEN EPL7 or the OM D E M10. I am not looking to invest in a whole new system as I plan to continue using my Nikon bodies and lenses. Would any UHH members who have experience with the Olympus brand, and particularly the two models mentioned above, be willing to share some comments or recommendations on these bodies and favorite lenses? I shoot mostly family, landscape, grandchildren's sporting events, vacation photos, and sometimes street scenes. The new gear would be used mostly on family vacations, weekend trips, and street photography. Thanks for any comments, suggestions.
Currently I use Nikon DSLR bodies (D610 and D7200)... (show quote)


I also have a Nikon (D7100) and bought an EM10 with the pancake lens for travel. The additional cost ECG-1 grip makes the camera a little easier to hang on to. I'm impressed with Olympus.
Go to
Sep 9, 2016 09:34:41   #
Dgusty3 wrote:
I currently have a Nikon D7100 camera, but would like to have a good camera that is small and compact that takes good pics. Anybody have any good recommendations?


I have a D7100 too, and decided on Olympus OMD cameras for something smaller to lug around on trips -- and am more than satisfied with the results.
Go to
Sep 8, 2016 11:56:48   #
JD750 wrote:
Quoted from CNET:

"No new MacBooks. No new iPads"

"It's kind of incredible that Apple is still selling a four-year-old MacBook Pro, and that its flagship MacBook Pro with Retina Display is still using Intel processors that are two to three years out of date. Mac users are getting understandably antsy about when, or whether, they'll be able to upgrade from older systems."

Apple has fallen behind and seems to have given up on the computer market. If I want a state of the art Lap Top that does not run Windows, what now? Linux?
Quoted from CNET: br br "No new MacBooks. No... (show quote)


The MacBook does run Linux under the covers.
Go to
Aug 27, 2016 08:34:43   #
LFingar wrote:
Amazing! Outstanding! Why, the only way I could have more faith in that product would be if I saw it advertised on TV for $19.99! Plus shipping and handling, of course!


But wait, they might double the offer . . .
Go to
Aug 15, 2016 12:07:07   #
Chaxl wrote:
My name is Chaxl; occasionally I'll post on here seeking advice on camera settings and/or techniques. In a few days my parents and I are going to Graceland and touring Elvis's mansion. being both the biggest Elvis fan and the photographer of the family, I don't want to use the wrong settings, especially when it's a 12 hour drive. Online I've read that photography is allowed throughout the house as long as there's no flash. My main question is what would be the most proper setting for indoor sots of the mansion without the flash. I don't own an SLR, but I am very satisfied with my Canon Powershot SX50. 90% of he time when I shoot, I use the 'Program' mode. Is this OK with indoor shots? Should my White Balance be on Florescence? What about my ISO as I don't want my photos to be grainy.

Thanks,, and any help would be much appreciated,
Chaxl
My name is Chaxl; occasionally I'll post on here s... (show quote)


I can be a little more helpful after finding my Graceland photos -- taken with a point and shoot. 37mm equivalent was not wide enough. At f/2.8 and ISO 141 (don't know where that came from) the shots were like 1/15th to 1/2 second. The exposures were a little dark for the most part, and I couldn't hold still enough, but that should give you an idea of what your settings need to be.
Go to
Aug 13, 2016 11:46:33   #
Chaxl wrote:
My name is Chaxl; occasionally I'll post on here seeking advice on camera settings and/or techniques. In a few days my parents and I are going to Graceland and touring Elvis's mansion. being both the biggest Elvis fan and the photographer of the family, I don't want to use the wrong settings, especially when it's a 12 hour drive. Online I've read that photography is allowed throughout the house as long as there's no flash. My main question is what would be the most proper setting for indoor sots of the mansion without the flash. I don't own an SLR, but I am very satisfied with my Canon Powershot SX50. 90% of he time when I shoot, I use the 'Program' mode. Is this OK with indoor shots? Should my White Balance be on Florescence? What about my ISO as I don't want my photos to be grainy.

Thanks,, and any help would be much appreciated,
Chaxl
My name is Chaxl; occasionally I'll post on here s... (show quote)


When I was there, I wished I had a wide angle lens. The mansion is small, and you don't have a lot of room to work with. The lighting in the car museum is pretty dim.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 7 8 9 10
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.