I have a followup question - When you go from LR5 to LR6 do you have to reinstall your plug-ins, e.g., Nik, Topaz, etc and homegrown presets into LR6?
rmalarz wrote:
What'll they think of next? Just the stuff that has made news for being completely wrong. I looked at portrait pro and did the same thing, sent it back. One can accomplish the very same things with the knowledgeable use of PS.
--Bob
You are absolutely right. And one could consider these plugin type software as nothing more than PS actions packages. However, these type of actions can save the user some time.
You can do a google search and download a free trial copy of the software and test it out.
I tried this program twice (purchased - returned, then tried free trial - uninstalled). All I can say is for me it was not as good as PortraitPro and at times the software was very confusing and did not play well with my computer. Also, the software was very hard to work with people wearing baggie clothes. I'm not saying the program is bad, but I am saying that the program did not work well for me. Has anyone else used it and what do you think about?
Two cents: You will notice that each time you add a layer, the file size increase ( look at the bottom left to see file size). Now depending on how much memory and how much storage space you have one could run into problems. Having a lot of layers open could cause your computer to run out of memory, which could result in one not being able to save the file in PS (one solution would be to save your work often). If you a lot of storage space then no problem, but over time even lots storage space will run out. For me, at the end of a year, the photo I want to archive are converted to jpegs. I'm not looking back, I'm looking forward and saving space. I also have a program for reducing the size, but not the quality of jpegs and this is the final thing I apply to prior year archive photos. Not saying this is right it's just how I work with layers and files. Also am not a professional by any means, just a hobbyist who likes to take pictures of my world.
And DO NOT CLICK ON ANY LINKS IN THAT EMAIL. VIRUSES!!!!
I use both DxO does not have a healing/spot removal brush and I have noticed that it sometimes does not play well with skin tones. With that being said it is an excellent software for landscapes photo and a good software for portraits.
Need a little more information: Name of your new router, IP provider and name of your modem.
Try DxO optics 11, they have a 30 day trial period.
jamesl wrote:
How about converting the camera's RAW files to DNG with the free Adobe DNG Converter, then try opening them in DxO 9 and you would still be working with a RAW file format and the extra data?
The DxO product line only works with raw, tiff and jpeg files, and their prime denoising only works on raw files.
thanks
Hi, I download the DxO Pro 9 and it does not have a profile for the Canon 7D Mark II. Can someone tell how to add the 7D Mark II to this program?
Thanks!
Just a thought - Canon does not manufacture batteries (period). The have them manufacture based their specification from other companies and you think that company doesn't sell the same battery under a different label?
I basically have the same set of lens you have, and I added a wide angle lens for landscape: EF-S 10-18mm f/4.5-5.6 IS STM. Now the other day I went a Museum and I thought that my EF 40mm f/2.8 or EF 50 f/1.8 would do the job. Now these lenses were okay, but they just weren't wide enough and had no zoom ability. I had given some thought to getting an EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM lens prior to the visit, but I already have 11 lenses and maybe only used two of them most of the time: EF 24-105mm f/4 and EF-S 18-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM ( I have two cameras 70D and SL1). For portraits I use just four lenses: EF 100mm f/2 USM, EF 70-200mm f/4 IS USM, EF 24-105mm f/4 IS USM and EF 50mm f/1.8. Getting back on point: one day I will be getting a full frame camera, so any lens I buy now should be an EF lens.