Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Is anyone using PortraitPro Body
Mar 20, 2017 06:10:47   #
baygolf Loc: DMV
 
I tried this program twice (purchased - returned, then tried free trial - uninstalled). All I can say is for me it was not as good as PortraitPro and at times the software was very confusing and did not play well with my computer. Also, the software was very hard to work with people wearing baggie clothes. I'm not saying the program is bad, but I am saying that the program did not work well for me. Has anyone else used it and what do you think about?

Reply
Mar 20, 2017 06:46:40   #
nison777 Loc: illinois u.s.a.
 
Would like to know more..

Reply
Mar 20, 2017 06:58:59   #
baygolf Loc: DMV
 
You can do a google search and download a free trial copy of the software and test it out.

Reply
 
 
Mar 20, 2017 07:15:49   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
What'll they think of next? Just the stuff that has made news for being completely wrong. I looked at portrait pro and did the same thing, sent it back. One can accomplish the very same things with the knowledgeable use of PS.
--Bob

baygolf wrote:
I tried this program twice (purchased - returned, then tried free trial - uninstalled). All I can say is for me it was not as good as PortraitPro and at times the software was very confusing and did not play well with my computer. Also, the software was very hard to work with people wearing baggie clothes. I'm not saying the program is bad, but I am saying that the program did not work well for me. Has anyone else used it and what do you think about?

Reply
Mar 20, 2017 07:31:20   #
nison777 Loc: illinois u.s.a.
 
Over the years there has always been cheep forms of recording images..
Some may remember the instomatics, 110, disc, just to name a few,
Oh and I must not leave out the Polaroid line.
The point and shoot camera s etc.
Yes they are and always have been annoying and somewhat embarrassing to see people use them and think they are capturing a high quality product.
Well we who have committed ourselves to a higher level of real photography must endure these kind of people, they are and have been ,and always will be around.
They supply the money for the technology for us to use and enjoy our better equipment. In purchasing these poor image making devices.
Everyone wants to be a good photographer, few are willing to do what is required to make not take images..
We who are serious must work harder , learn to work around them when in our way , choose a different view point, do better homework and arrive at the scene when they are not around, real photography has been made in this way always.
On a rare occasions you get to see the photographer in a scene surrounded by unflattering circumstances making an image.
Unfortunately that's the case most of the time.
They are usually and unfortunately not the only one there.
I as well as many of you have the story of how the shot got made,
and what it took to get it made..
You are not alone in this subject..

Reply
Mar 20, 2017 07:34:25   #
baygolf Loc: DMV
 
rmalarz wrote:
What'll they think of next? Just the stuff that has made news for being completely wrong. I looked at portrait pro and did the same thing, sent it back. One can accomplish the very same things with the knowledgeable use of PS.
--Bob


You are absolutely right. And one could consider these plugin type software as nothing more than PS actions packages. However, these type of actions can save the user some time.

Reply
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.