Posts: rick21043 | Ugly Hedgehog

This is the reason I never post any comments.
A high percentage of people are generous with their contributions but displays like this is cause for concern bordering on childlessness.

My two cents.

Go to

Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.

Mar 6, 2013 17:05:37 #

(Photo Gallery)

Wood Duck again

To be frank, I don't know how to navigate very well and it took me some time to figure out how to put it here.

Go to

Mar 6, 2013 16:38:07 #

(Photo Gallery)

Wood Duck again

Can't stop taking pictures of this Wood Duck plus one other.

Go to

Feb 25, 2013 16:12:16 #

(Photo Gallery)

Wood Duck head shots

Thank you. With a subject like that, it's hard to mess up.....

Go to

Feb 25, 2013 15:01:00 #

(Photo Gallery)

Wood Duck head shots

These pictures were taken with the following specifications: Camera Model Canon EOS-1D X
Tv( Shutter Speed ) 1/2500
Av( Aperture Value ) 14.0
Exposure Compensation -2/3
ISO Speed 1600
Lens EF800mm f/5.6L IS USM +1.4x III

Go to

Check out Underwater Photography Forum section of our forum.

Jan 25, 2013 16:19:54 #

(Photo Gallery)

Wood Duck

Here's my great Blue Heron shot you might like.

Regards....

Go to

Jan 25, 2013 16:06:00 #

(Photo Gallery)

Wood Duck

Morrisdh wrote:

Gosh I want color like that. Thanks for sharing.
mdh

Your more than welcome. I don't believe there is a more multi colored duck on earth, but I'm not a birder.

Go to

Jan 25, 2013 15:21:07 #

(Photo Gallery)

Wood Duck

This guy was extremely illusive.

Finally captured him with a 300mm /W 1.4 extender, ISO 1000 @ F/13

Go to

Jul 7, 2012 19:23:08 #

(Main Photography Discussion)

70-200mm f/2.8 vs 70-200mm f/2.8 IS

Ah, that was terrific and well written.

As you must be aware, my bigger lenses are IS (thank God ) and I've learned if I don't go over the capabilities of my equipment factoring in ISO, F stops, etc. I can get fairly good results.

If you wish, you can Email me and I would be glad to send you a little collage of my pic's.

rollingthunder78@verizon.net

I'm not very good at traversing on this type of site / Facebook, etc. so please excuse me if this sending is improper.

Go to

Jul 7, 2012 17:18:25 #

(Main Photography Discussion)

70-200mm f/2.8 vs 70-200mm f/2.8 IS

rick21043 wrote:

The people that know me can vouch for my statement,

I hand hold all my lenses up to the 800mm. (I use a lot of ISO)

Ooops, further clarification......... Never was disappointed with the lens........on me, many occasions.

As far as hand holding lens, I get a much better % of capture of diving eagles or alike grabbing fish out of the water than I would using a tripod.

Enjoyed your humor.

Go to

Jul 7, 2012 16:24:46 #

(Main Photography Discussion)

70-200mm f/2.8 vs 70-200mm f/2.8 IS

The people that know me can vouch for my statement,

I hand hold all my lenses up to the 800mm. (I use a lot of ISO)

Go to

Jul 7, 2012 14:20:46 #

(Main Photography Discussion)

70-200mm f/2.8 vs 70-200mm f/2.8 IS

The attached was shot with the 70-200 f/2.8 non IS. hand held.

I've shot thousands of pictures from wildlife to as shown, day or night with this lens and never been disappointed. ( always hand held )

Save you money...........

Go to

Apr 27, 2012 17:10:02 #

(Photo Gallery)

Little Green Heron in the Bush

Nikonian72 wrote:

A few shore plants, and this little Green Heron thought he was successfully camouflaged.

Tough shot, well done.

Just to let you know, I was chastised for putting my picture in as you just did. Apparently, it's "bad form" which consequently, I will no longer associate myself with this website.

I felt this website was to help people, share and discuss different topics for the good of everyone belonging.

Apparently, I was wrong and will terminate my membership.

BTW, I've really enjoyed your input on many occasions,

Regards,

Rick
www.rickmandelson.com

Go to

Page: 1 2 3 4 next>>

Check out Close Up Photography section of our forum.

Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections

UglyHedgehog.com - Forum