Great shots! I was thinking about this lens or this same purpose. Do you like it? Any problems or concerns with it?
Jay
Here are a few of the Snowy Owl images I've captured in western NY.
Thanks,
John, Tom, and Retired
Retired, thanks, I guess there's no edit feature here to go back and change it.
Jay
Here are a couple of images of a Copper's Hawk eating a Starling.
Here's one I got exactly two years ago today. It was worth getting there as the sun was coming up
It is an immature bald eagle. There are major differences.
Check the images in ths web page
http://www.hancockwildlife.org/forum/viewtopic.php?showtopic=132018
I like the second one. You did it very well. If vignetting is done right, you should not notice it.
A professional does not back-off, suck it up, or bend over when there has been a material breach of contract.
gsugal
I heard a photographer at a convention many years ago, say - I agree - "that you bend over backwards for your customer, but you don't bend over forwards"
I agree with the others. 1. way to busy, 2. not enough interest.3. Is very good, but hard to tell if it's great with this quality.
I really like the 1st and 3rd. The 2nd doesn't look believable.
I left out a number in the price, sorry, still interested? You knew that couldn't be right?
Maybe you're right. The bird just doesn't belong. I like birds, but it competes for the attention.
It's a great lens, but it was the first one they came out with, without the vibration control. I'd like to get $425 for it.
Would I want it? No, but the only thing that matters is does she like it. If that's her personality, and she likes it, that is all that matters.
Here's a corny senior image, but she loved it. (That's her ring that sh's sitting on)
I don't have a picture of it, or have it anymore, but my first wedding , I shot with a Mamiya C330 Twin lens camera. That was about 1974.