Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Photo Software
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
May 25, 2017 11:25:02   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
Glasgow wrote:
Does anyone know of any good software that's free or a one time fee, I don't like this monthly or yearly payment software


Serif's Affinity Photo. It's less than $50, fully supported, and is available in the same version for both Macintosh and Windows computers. If I had nothing, I'd start here first.

Photoshop Elements is popular, but you're editing 8-bit images, which isn't ideal. The good news is, much of it is like its big brother, Photoshop, so the knowledge is transferable to the pro CC version.

GIMP is free. Google "public domain photo editing software" and similar phrases and you'll find TONS of links to free or low cost solutions.

The only problem with freeware and shareware is that the documentation can be spotty, training can be non-existent, and compatibility can be unpredictable with new hardware and operating systems.

That said, one of my all-time favorite software packages is the Mac ONLY Graphic Converter 10, a Swiss Army Knife-like tool that is a $40 shareware package. You can try it free. I have it running right now. It does great batch conversions, can be used as an image sorter, slide show viewer, image re-namer...

Reply
May 25, 2017 11:28:10   #
AzPicLady Loc: Behind the camera!
 
GIMP

Reply
May 25, 2017 11:58:33   #
Glasgow
 
Sounds good and will give them a try

Thanks

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 12:10:46   #
advocate1982
 
russelray wrote:
You don't say if you have a limit on your one-time fee. What I do is consider the monthly $9.99 a one-time fee of $119.88 split into interest-free monthly payments
with an annual upgrade fee of $119.88 also split into interest-free monthly payments.
Considering that I used to upgrade Lightroom and Photoshop every time an upgrade came out, at several hundred dollars worth of one-time upgrade fees,
what I'm doing now is about $300 less expensive annually. I think that's a bargain.
And with monthly fees now instead of huge purchase fees and upgrade fees, I actually now can afford Illustrator, InDesign, Acrobat, Lightroom, Photoshop, and Premier Pro!
You don't say if you have a limit on your one-time... (show quote)


But you are not forced to upgrade with every upgrade. The only reason for an upgrade is because the software now does something that you need to complete you work. I haven't found anything in Photoshop that I would need to upgrade for and am quite happy with my CC3 version of Photoshop even though because I have the photo package at $10.50 a month so can have the 2017 version it offers nothing that I use, and I never upgrade a piece of software just because. Too often the upgrade breaks a working system.

Reply
May 25, 2017 12:18:54   #
amfoto1 Loc: San Jose, Calif. USA
 
Glasgow wrote:
Does anyone know of any good software that's free or a one time fee, I don't like this monthly or yearly payment software


If you are new to doing post-processing, buy Adobe Elements 15. It's about $100, sometimes on sale for a bit less. No "rent" payments.

It's got a lot of built-in support for new users. It's also in very wide use, so there are plenty of third party books, tutorials... even plug-ins.

You can download a free 30-day trial of Elements from the Adobe website, at the end of which you can decide if you want to buy it or not. If you do this, I suggest you buy one or another of the guide books in advance, so that you don't waste time fumbling around with the new program and get as full benefit as possible from the trial period.

Elements can do all most users really need. It's got both organizational and image editing tools. In contrast, Adobe's other, more pro-oriented programs are not "all in one": Lightroom is primarily an organizer, while Photoshop is the Mac Daddy of all image editors. They are designed to work together and complement each other.

Elements is designed to stand on its own and provide all you're likely need (if you also want to handle videos with it, get the more expensive Premiere version).

burkphoto wrote:
....Photoshop Elements is popular, but you're editing 8-bit images, which isn't ideal....


Not true.

Yes, one of the relatively minor limitations of Elements is that it's an "8-bit program". And, yes, it's best to "work" with images in 16-bit mode. HOWEVER.... Elements actually does work in 16-bit whenever you use it to handle RAW conversions, same as you would need to do with any other editing program (in-camera JPEGs are already reduced to 8-bit). The Adobe Camera Raw "engine" built into Elements is the same as what's used in Lightroom and Photoshop. It's only a few of the specialty filters and such that aren't available in Elements until after the image has been saved as an 8-bit JPEG. Really no biggie.

For most people it doesn't matter that Elements is only able to output/save 8-bit JPEG (and similar) files, because those are more than adequate and even what's wanted for the vast majority of purposes. Typically only commercial, pro uses might call for 16-bit TIFFs (and similar). In fact, many printing services require 8-bit JPEGs. Even if you were to use a 16-bit TIFF to make a print yourself, assuming your photo quality inkjet can handle it, there will be no visible difference in the final print. The human eye cannot differentiate between 8-bit and 16-bit. Likely the only difference would be that it takes a lot longer to print.

Reply
May 25, 2017 12:33:43   #
Leopardo
 
I use DXO Optics Pro 11 to work my RAW files. So little else is generally needed that an outdated lightroom or photoshop (non subscription) can usually suffice.

Reply
May 25, 2017 12:38:13   #
pkgoldberg
 
Check out : https://macphun.com/luminar Free trial period and only $69.

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 12:49:08   #
burkphoto Loc: High Point, NC
 
advocate1982 wrote:
But you are not forced to upgrade with every upgrade. The only reason for an upgrade is because the software now does something that you need to complete you work. I haven't found anything in Photoshop that I would need to upgrade for and am quite happy with my CC3 version of Photoshop even though because I have the photo package at $10.50 a month so can have the 2017 version it offers nothing that I use, and I never upgrade a piece of software just because. Too often the upgrade breaks a working system.
But you are not forced to upgrade with every upgra... (show quote)


Professionals just expense it. It is a TINY expense for what it provides. We may need only 10% of it, but every now and then, the developers add a real gem that is worth hundreds, maybe thousands, of dollars in time saved, or product sold. And for job preservation, pros must keep skills current.

The biggest complaint about the old $700 Photoshop package and its $400 upgrade package was that if you had a number of seats, you had a substantial charge every 12 to 24 months. Adobe didn't meet a particular schedule, so we didn't know how to budget for it. A subscription is predictable, and businesses like predictability. At the lab I worked for, we had 50 seats of Photoshop! We skipped at least every other upgrade before they came out with the CC plan. Each time we did upgrade, we had a training nightmare, and some older computers couldn't handle the new software.

Most hobbyists could care less about upgrades — I get that. But pros do. They upgrade their computers about every three to five years, as Apple and Microsoft upgrade their operating systems (The Microsoft users often stay one version behind, deliberately, because it is tested and stable!). New operating systems are often incompatible with older software, so there is a tendency to need the latest version. Older computers can be relegated to secondary tasks as word processors, accounting computers, print servers... Newer operating systems are most compatible with new hardware, so... At my former employer, we expensed all computer equipment under $2500, unless it was part of a capital project, which we depreciated over a three year period if it was IT related. The assumption was that it was probably going to be replaced rather quickly...

At home, of course, I'm typing this on a late 2013 iMac I bought in 2015. We have two MacBook Pros from 2012, and a Mac Mini from 2010. But all will still run all current software sufficiently for our needs. With multiple startup drives and Parallels Desktop, we can run several versions of MacOS and Windows, so we can run PAST software that newer operating systems break. We also have a very old (1999!) Power Mac G4 that runs the very old OS 9.2.2 and OS X 10.4.11. We turned it on twice last year to retrieve and modify old PageMaker 6.5 and 7.0 documents my wife's company still needed. It is so quaint!

I have a Microsoft Office 365 family subscription, because we all use Word and PowerPoint, and my wife uses Outlook and Excel. We have the Adobe Ps + Lr + Bridge + ACR CC bundle. At work, my wife has the full CC suite. We don't look back... Keeping up with our training is easy, because new features are available as developed, and the incremental increase in knowledge is small.

Reply
May 25, 2017 12:53:39   #
russelray Loc: La Mesa CA
 
advocate1982 wrote:
But you are not forced to upgrade with every upgrade. The only reason for an upgrade is because the software now does something that you need to complete you work. I haven't found anything in Photoshop that I would need to upgrade for and am quite happy with my CC3 version of Photoshop even though because I have the photo package at $10.50 a month so can have the 2017 version it offers nothing that I use, and I never upgrade a piece of software just because. Too often the upgrade breaks a working system.
But you are not forced to upgrade with every upgra... (show quote)

I used to never upgrade unless it was a major upgrade. Still don't. When CC came along I let upgrades, even minor upgrades, do their thing automatically when I slept at night. Got up one morning and the working system was broke. Fortunately, I always create a restore point at the end of the day, as well as backing up all that day's work. So I was able to restore to the previous day, and then I turned automatic updates off. That includes not only Adobe products but ALL my products. Except one. Malwarebytes gets to run uncontested 24/7 and all of my computers, from the old Windows 7 to the 8 computer, the 8.1 computer, and my fine fine fine new Windows 10 $2,100 super computer (<url>http://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-461559-1.html</url>).

Reply
May 25, 2017 12:55:37   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
mediaman123 wrote:
Is Photoshop Elements still available for Mac? Is so, what is the latest version- 15?


Yes it is available for Mac and the current version is 15.

Reply
May 25, 2017 12:57:00   #
russelray Loc: La Mesa CA
 
Bears repeating since I could not have said it better myself for my own situation.
burkphoto wrote:
Professionals just expense it. It is a TINY expense for what it provides. We may need only 10% of it, but every now and then, the developers add a real gem that is worth hundreds, maybe thousands, of dollars in time saved, or product sold. And for job preservation, pros must keep skills current.

The biggest complaint about the old $700 Photoshop package and its $400 upgrade package was that if you had a number of seats, you had a substantial charge every 12 to 24 months. Adobe didn't meet a particular schedule, so we didn't know how to budget for it. A subscription is predictable, and businesses like predictability. At the lab I worked for, we had 50 seats of Photoshop! We skipped at least every other upgrade before they came out with the CC plan. Each time we did upgrade, we had a training nightmare, and some older computers couldn't handle the new software.

Most hobbyists could care less about upgrades — I get that. But pros do. They upgrade their computers about every three to five years, as Apple and Microsoft upgrade their operating systems (The Microsoft users often stay one version behind, deliberately, because it is tested and stable!). New operating systems are often incompatible with older software, so there is a tendency to need the latest version. Older computers can be relegated to secondary tasks as word processors, accounting computers, print servers... Newer operating systems are most compatible with new hardware, so... At my former employer, we expensed all computer equipment under $2500, unless it was part of a capital project, which we depreciated over a three year period if it was IT related. The assumption was that it was probably going to be replaced rather quickly...

At home, of course, I'm typing this on a late 2013 iMac I bought in 2015. We have two MacBook Pros from 2012, and a Mac Mini from 2010. But all will still run all current software sufficiently for our needs. With multiple startup drives and Parallels Desktop, we can run several versions of MacOS and Windows, so we can run PAST software that newer operating systems break. We also have a very old (1999!) Power Mac G4 that runs the very old OS 9.2.2 and OS X 10.4.11. We turned it on twice last year to retrieve and modify old PageMaker 6.5 and 7.0 documents my wife's company still needed. It is so quaint!

I have a Microsoft Office 365 family subscription, because we all use Word and PowerPoint, and my wife uses Outlook and Excel. We have the Adobe Ps + Lr + Bridge + ACR CC bundle. At work, my wife has the full CC suite. We don't look back... Keeping up with our training is easy, because new features are available as developed, and the incremental increase in knowledge is small.
Professionals just expense it. It is a TINY expens... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2017 12:59:59   #
chepo1956 Loc: Puerto Rico
 
Affinity Photo from Serif works for me and it continues to receive great reviews.

Reply
May 25, 2017 13:00:41   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
DaveyDitzer wrote:
I do not mean to hijack this topic, but I am just a beginner at post processing. I have Photoshop Elements 12. Is there any good reason to upgrade to PS15? Now, my PSE 12 can't handle RAW so that may be reason enough; but I would like UHH opinions and advice. thank you and sorry if my question is out of line here.


There are a few new tools and techniques in PSE 15 not found in PSE 12. But, the core and key tools are about the same.

PSE 12 will handle RAW images from any camera produced through the end of the one year of PSE 12's marketing life. If you have a camera newer than that, there are two choices with PSE. One is to buy the current version. The other is to use a free and current converter from Adobe to make raw DNG files from whatever newer camera you have.

Reply
May 25, 2017 13:07:58   #
Paul Buckhiester Loc: Columbus, GA USA
 
Glasgow wrote:
Does anyone know of any good software that's free or a one time fee, I don't like this monthly or yearly payment software


I think you are being a bit shortsighted. The Cc subscription includes syncing w Adobe mobile apps, a powerfully to convenient capability. I also use CC store my catalog backups. Sharing collections w clients and friends/family is also immensely helpful. LR's connectivity w Blurb and social sites is seemless. Plus adobe throws in a free gallery website. I can't imagine a better deal. I just hope they don't increase the price.

Reply
May 25, 2017 13:13:17   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Corel Paint Shop Pro can do everything I have ever done in Photoshop. Corel has excellent video tutorials. It has pop up instructions you can turn on and off.

--

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.