BigGWells wrote:
One thing that I see is happening is people are being told, they are not allowed to bring in cell phones, point and shoots or any camera at all. Lord knows how we all know how the Asians are with their cameras....on auto...LOL
And once again. DO NOT SHOOT WEDDINGS
Recognizing the dangers of stereotypes I tell the following story:
Some time in the late 1970's my parents' (Presbyterian) church sponsored a refugee family from Cambodia. A few years later, one of the kids was married in a Catholic church, and my mother said we should go to be "supportive of the family" since it was presumed that they were "all alone here". Not!
What seemed like a small army of their friends and family showed up, all having relatively nice cameras. Although we were/are good protestants, we understood proper behavior in a Catholic church ... but they didn't. The priest was very low-key and "understanding", but throughout the ceremony the Cambodians were all over the place, and in order to get good shots, way too many ( yes, I know, just one would be"too many" ) of them were behind the altar rail, sitting on the baptismal font, etc) at any one time.
We always use that as the best "bad example" of behavior at a wedding.
As I have said multiple times, I believe that "no camera" rules are largely pointless in settings like this unless you are willing to expend a vast amount of effort enforcing it. Virtually everyone below the age of 30 (i.e., the prime age for friends of the couple) uses a cell phone to chronicle their lives, and a little thing like rules isn't going to crimp their style.
I believe the best hope is to begin the ceremony by reminding those present of a few rules of courtesy ... perhaps no flash (no big deal to smart phone users), where not to go, etc.
I might point out that this discussion is now wandering way away from issues in the original story.