Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Photo Analysis
limitation of Nikon D7100 and 18-55mm kit lens
Page <<first <prev 5 of 8 next> last>>
Oct 28, 2013 18:32:13   #
amadjuster Loc: Amarillo, TX
 
Oops, Wrong thread. Sorry

Reply
Nov 1, 2013 12:41:24   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
oldtigger wrote:
there was an error in focusing, tuned it out. I'm coming to the conclusion that some of the things i'm complaining about are just the nature-of-the beast due to the physical structure of the sensor receptors and not the lens. i remember now that some of the thin emulsion films used to give me much the same results. They would yield higher resolution but the'perceived' depth of field would go to hell in a hand basket so to speak. Lowering the ISO to 100 and opening the lens a notch gives enough slop over to remove most of the problem and staying away from the mid zoom range cleans up the rest. If i'm shooting 35mm i should be using my prime lens anyway. I just got so wrapped up in evaluating the lens that i failed to take into account the fact that the sensor is not a flat plane.
there was an error in focusing, tuned it out. I'm ... (show quote)


Now that i've lived with the 18-55 kit lens for a couple weeks i feel very strongly that it should not be considered for use on a 7100 body. Go directly to a good autofocus zoom from a variety of manufacturers; you will be much happier with your captures.

Reply
Nov 1, 2013 16:32:03   #
winterrose Loc: Kyneton, Victoria, Australia
 
oldtigger wrote:
Now that i've lived with the 18-55 kit lens for a couple weeks i feel very strongly that it should not be considered for use on a 7100 body. Go directly to a good autofocus zoom from a variety of manufacturers; you will be much happier with your captures.


Either there is something wrong with your copy of the 18-55mm lens or you don't know how to use it. Please don't mislead other newbies into thinking what a lot of people think, that a "good" (meaning far more expensive) lens will be the saviour of all their woes, or scare them into spending a lot of money. The Nikon 18-55mm may not be in the league of far more expensive glass but it certainly has the capability of producing very fine images. A good tradesman never blames his tools. That you avoid the mid range of the zoom is surprising as the 18-55mm is yet another zoom that produces its optimum IQ in that very area. Lastly, if your sensor isn't flat then you have a far more significant problem! Rob.

Reply
 
 
Nov 3, 2013 06:26:05   #
chodrak Loc: Connecticut
 
The photo looks out of focus. That would explain the lack of focus. It is hard to focus when there is no large object to focus on.

Reply
Nov 3, 2013 06:33:05   #
winterrose Loc: Kyneton, Victoria, Australia
 
chodrak wrote:
The photo looks out of focus. That would explain the lack of focus. It is hard to focus when there is no large object to focus on.


"It is hard to focus when there is no large object to focus on."
Not valid.

Reply
Nov 3, 2013 18:22:22   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
winterrose wrote:
"It is hard to focus when there is no large object to focus on."
Not valid.


i agree with you in a sense chodrak, trying to focus on the edge of a leaf a hundred feet away using the viewfinder is sort of hit or miss and asking auto focus to do its job in all that clutter is kind of foolish. Reducing my 6000x4000 image to 1500x1000 before posting compounded the problem for you as a viewer. (i won't make that mistake again)
However, none of that matters. None of the original shows the contrast or saturation i expected and there is nothing at any distance in the image that looks as though it is in focus. Our time was not wasted; i've learned more from submitting this poor image than i would have from a dozen good ones and in my opinion that is what this forum is all about.

Reply
Nov 10, 2013 14:58:14   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
oldtigger wrote:
I think this the right group to post in. I used D7100 body, full manual, f8, ISO 200, 18-55mm AF-S DX kit lens at 55mm, VR off, tripod mounted, 75-100 feet away , manual focus on leaf group in center of frame, EV on my spot meter was 10 for the unshaded areas. The shot in my opinion lacks clarity, crispness, snap or whatever the buzzword is in use now. We all know the 24mpx DX sensor is capable of more.
Is this all the lens is capable of, do i expect too much of the combination or is my technique missing something crucial for good results? Please give it to me straight, i feel naked enough just coming up here to ask the question.
I think this the right group to post in. I used D7... (show quote)


Finally determined and corrected the problem with the lens. here are three shots of my monitor showing the problem before and after corrective action. I used a cinder block on the camera to prevent movement during the exposure.
The kit lens is capable of capturing adequate images if the slop in the front element is not too great. Compare before you buy if possible as selection of shim thickness is very touchy and will change as the plastic shrinks.



Reply
 
 
Nov 13, 2013 23:24:27   #
JohninRockville Loc: Rockville, Indiana
 
I'm not familiar with Nikon - but with my Canon the setting for landscape is generally excellent in this kind of shot. That said, f8 seems a bit wide for getting a larger area in focus. With most lenses the "sweet spot" is around f11, although there's nothing wrong with going even smaller, like f16? You had a tripod so shutter speed isn't a great worry unless it's windy.

Reply
Nov 14, 2013 08:02:42   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
initially johninrockville i thought my lens was failing to yield sharp edges when focused properly. Turns out the reduction process masked the real problem; front lens element barrel wobble. Increasing the barrel diameter so that the zoom ring could act as a restraining guide cleared up the problem and made the lens useable.

Reply
Nov 19, 2013 08:44:33   #
Howard5252 Loc: New York / Florida (now)
 
oldtigger wrote:
I think this the right group to post in. I used D7100 body, full manual, f8, ISO 200, 18-55mm AF-S DX kit lens at 55mm, VR off, tripod mounted, 75-100 feet away , manual focus on leaf group in center of frame, EV on my spot meter was 10 for the unshaded areas. The shot in my opinion lacks clarity, crispness, snap or whatever the buzzword is in use now. We all know the 24mpx DX sensor is capable of more.
Is this all the lens is capable of, do i expect too much of the combination or is my technique missing something crucial for good results? Please give it to me straight, i feel naked enough just coming up here to ask the question.
I think this the right group to post in. I used D7... (show quote)


I too have a D7100 and the 18-300 3.5/5.6 lens. Before looking at your equipment, I would take more pictures of a similar nature. In a picture of this nature I would question EXACTLY where the focus was. It has been my experience that problems I ran into were mine ... not my equipment.

Reply
Nov 29, 2013 22:50:02   #
jethro779 Loc: Tucson, AZ
 
oldtigger wrote:
Bill, is there a difference between reply and quick reply?


Yes, in quick reply you don't get the emoticons or the tags to adjust the color or italicize or underline.

Reply
 
 
Dec 16, 2013 00:56:38   #
Lenf Loc: Strasburg,PA
 
oldtigger wrote:
Finally determined and corrected the problem with the lens. here are three shots of my monitor showing the problem before and after corrective action. I used a cinder block on the camera to prevent movement during the exposure.
The kit lens is capable of capturing adequate images if the slop in the front element is not too great. Compare before you buy if possible as selection of shim thickness is very touchy and will change as the plastic shrinks.


very interesting test Old Tigger, I have a D7000 and various lens and have not had any issues, i believe i will give this test a try when i have some spare time.. Its Q&A replays from your initial question , that makes this group interesting and helpful!

Reply
Jan 8, 2014 11:35:26   #
Blurryeyed Loc: NC Mountains.
 
Actually your picture looks pretty good to me, when you consider that the leaves on the left edge of the pic seem to be very well focused, I am not sure what you are expecting from the camera. DOF will only go so far and you have a pretty tough exposure there as it is a relatively dark subject in the shade... I am not so sure that your lens did not do a really good job with this picture, I don't think that a more expensive lens would have necessarily delivered the results you are looking for.

Reply
Jan 8, 2014 13:17:18   #
oldtigger Loc: Roanoke Virginia-USA
 
Lenf wrote:
very interesting test Old Tigger, I have a D7000 and various lens and have not had any issues, i believe i will give this test a try when i have some spare time.. Its Q&A replays from your initial question , that makes this group interesting and helpful!


Be very careful when following this particular thread lenf. Several different things/problems are touched on.
This was one of the first images i shot with the intention of actually wanting a usable image. i had never used a digital camera for anything but setting up shots for my F4 film cameras. I knew nothing about plastic lenses and was learning on the fly as the thread grew.

Originally i thought the problem was optical quality, others felt it was focus or technic, etc. etc. We bounced around quite a bit.

In the end the problem was simply mechanical. I was blessed with a lens whose manufacturing tolerances left me with a lens which was particularly sensitive to mirror slap. Leaving AF engaged dampened some of the image shift and shimming the barrel cured the floppy barrel. The lens now works as well as any other $200 zoom.

i now have several cheap plastic lenses because people give them to me as body caps when i buy digital bodies. One of my favorites is a 35mm f1.8. Takes great pictures, i would recommend it to anyone wanting a fast, sharp, inexpensive, "normal" DX lens. i often carry it when i don't want to risk my good glass 50mm's or deal with the bulk of a fat zoom.

Its worthless though for shooting focus stacks or focus dependant HDR sets on a tripod because as you rotate the focus ring through a 90 degree arc, the image as seen in unmagnified live-view shifts laterally half the width of a cigarette filter.

There was a time you could buy a nikon lens and know it wold be just as good as the one your competition bought last week. Now days its a good idea to check a lens before you leave the store.

Reply
Jan 14, 2014 16:37:40   #
Old Veteran Loc: Georgia
 
Hi "Old"; I use to make the f stop as small as possible to get more sharpness throughout the photo. If the air was "still", doing this wouldn't be a problem.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Photo Analysis
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.