Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
indoor shooting
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Jan 2, 2013 09:42:46   #
clicktime Loc: Yucca Valley Ca.
 
Welcome to the Hog.I'm not going to comment on the other comments. Here is what I think you need to do. As well as some of the other advisors on this thread.
Books by Brian Peters.
1. Understanding Flash Photography
2. Understanding Exposure
3. Understanding Shutter speed
If you read these books your problem will in the past.

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 10:02:52   #
ggttc Loc: TN
 
JR1 wrote:
I will probably upset someone with a one word reply

FLASH


I agree...not a pro wedding photographer but been asked to take my camera more than a few times...no one has ever been offended by a flash...people at a wedding know that pics will be taken...in fact I have often had people come up to me and ask to have their picture taken

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 10:20:06   #
wilsondl2 Loc: Lincoln, Nebraska
 
JR1 wrote:
I will probably upset someone with a one word reply

FLASH


I agree. Sometimes you just have to do it. (flash) This was at the reception and should not have upset anyone with a flash. I would have put a deffuser on to soften the light a little. sounds like gettin white balance in that room would be a headach seems like it would change from place to place and doing PP on a bunch of snapshot pics would be lots of work. Sometimes you just can't do it with avalable light. - Dave

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2013 10:50:10   #
Mudshark Loc: Illinois
 
It may not be possible to do what you were trying under the lighting that was available. If....IF....you can get away with it try to see if you can turn some extra lights on without offending the party...start with your lens at its widest that would be f 2.8 in your case. Then see what speed you can acquire a decent exposure at.
Another way to cheat the situation if you can...shoot RAW and under expose a stop...then regain the stop in post processing...You most likely aren't ready for that stuff yet.
You could try finding places to "rest" your camera on while making the exposures...you can get real creative in this area and be amazed at the results...people standing around drinking are not really moving all that much. Rest your camera on the top of a glass, or on the back of a chair, etc., etc. and go ahead and use a slow shutter speed with your lens at wide open...you'll be surprised at the results...

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 10:50:40   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
Pepper wrote:
Croce wrote:

I hate to tell you this but it sounds like you need to learn the basic rudiments of what you are doing.


I think that's why he asked the question, who knows maybe that's what drew him to UHH. Responses like the above is what makes so many newbies and beginners afraid to ask questions. I apologize Croce but that response just hit me the wrong way. :-(


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 10:51:06   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
Croce wrote:
Hi Sawdust, you need to give us more information. What Rebel are you shooting? 1600 is too high for quality photos indoors for most cameras. Even 400 may be high for some. If you are not using off camera flash chances are you will be disappointed. 1/25 of a second is very very slow for handheld shots with people in motion. What aperture were you using? Although you can shoot that lens at f2.8, the sharpest aperture is probably around f5.6 to f8. I hate to tell you this but it sounds like you need to learn the basic rudiments of what you are doing.
Hi Sawdust, you need to give us more information. ... (show quote)


:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 10:52:03   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
Croce wrote:
Sorry Pepper, suck it up. It is impossible to give an answer to an open ended question like that without being frank. I was not being mean, I was being honest, the poor guy needs some very basic knowledge before he can assimilate the why of an answer to his problem. You are being overly sensitive and if you care to give psychiatric help rather than photographic help, the poor guy will never get off the ground. My opinion. Now it's your turn Pepper. Help the fellow take a better photo. :?


:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2013 10:53:22   #
Robert the Bruce
 
Your right on . Aim new also . Seek an you will find.

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 10:54:43   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
Croce wrote:
Pepper wrote:
My point was not the construct of his question nor was it the intent of your response. My point is that your response was elitist and condescending. If there are assumptions to where one has to be in their photographic journey before they can ask questions I’m not aware of them. One further point I’d submit is that some need to learn how to ask questions and that too is something that we can (if we choose) help the beginner with. Rubbing your knowledge in the face of the newbie by making them feel small or inadequate is a far greater reflection on you than on them….As always JMHO.
My point was not the construct of his question nor... (show quote)


You know I'm offended by YOUR elitist pompous attitude. The man asked for help I gave him both a couple of good pointers and some solid advise. What did you offer him? NOTHING! You are a hipocrite. Go find yourself somewhere. If he was offended by my response or attitude I'm sure he is man enough to let me know. He does need your high and mighty, mighty mouse to the rescue attitude to intercede for him. You have no respect. Only an offending paternalistic attitude. Do you own a camera Pepper or just haunt the Chit Chat room?
quote=Pepper My point was not the construct of hi... (show quote)


:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 10:55:56   #
Wahawk Loc: NE IA
 
JR1 wrote:
Croce wrote:
Sorry Pepper, suck it up. It is impossible to give an answer to an open ended question like that without being frank. I was not being mean, I was being honest, the poor guy needs some very basic knowledge before he can assimilate the why of an answer to his problem. You are being overly sensitive and if you care to give psychiatric help rather than photographic help, the poor guy will never get off the ground. My opinion. Now it's your turn Pepper. Help the fellow take a better photo. :?


I have to agree with you, people are FAR too TOUCHY about others responses, this IS a forum and as long as a reply is not rude or lacking some advice my comment is LIVE with it.

God there is enough carp political correctness in the world without having to worry about what you have to say here unless it is offensive.
quote=Croce Sorry Pepper, suck it up. It is impos... (show quote)


:thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown: :thumbdown:

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 11:11:26   #
DebAnn Loc: Toronto
 
Hi Sawdust3. I have found that people usually aren't upset when you shoot with flash at weddings because they are expecting that photographers will be shooting all around them. My experience with lighting in some venues is much as you describe - all over the place. Having an on or off camera flash covered with a good diffuser usually gets me perfectly acceptable shots but you do have to be reasonably close to the subjects. Venues frequently have very high ceilings so bouncing off them doesn't work. At one particularly bad venue, I had my sister follow me around with a second flash on a monopod which was triggered by the flash on my camera. Worked like a charm. If you really aren't sure of exposure settings, today's DSLRs have an Auto setting that produces good results. My Rebels (T1i and T3i) work well on Auto. I know seasoned photographers rarely own up to using the Auto setting but it will give you better results than shooting at exposure settings you're not sure of. Good luck on your next event.

Reply
 
 
Jan 2, 2013 11:31:07   #
deskjet1uk Loc: Yorkshire UK
 
sawdust3 wrote:
Have been reading and trying to learn how to shoot indoors. Shot ny friends wedding last Sat. Banquet room had some bright lighting and alot of dark also. Tried no flash with a canon rebel, Tamron 28-75 f2.8 lense with iso at 1600 max for this camera. Not real good. pictures are very pixilated and fuzzy. How do you shoot in these conditions? Know this is vague. Will send a photo. used shutter speed 1/25


Hi Sawdust,
In my experience using the self same camera a couple of years back, I purchased an EF 50mm f/1.8 lens – it’s lightweight and low-light capable. It allowed me to shoot casual street photography at night.

The greatest use I’ve found for this is night time street shooting. It works! The 1000D maxes out at ISO 1600, which reflects its level status. Shooting between f/18 and f/4, and between 1/60s and 1/15s,
If you are able to purchase one of these lenses (approx $100) it will be money worth spent and you will be able to use this lens when you next upgrade.
Happy shooting and happy new year and keep experimenting with your settings etc.

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 11:42:26   #
Straightshooter Loc: Edmonton AB
 
I won't accuse anyone of being insensitive, but I think a more sympathetic approach for beginners would be more appropriate.

Hope this helps.[/quote]
I totally agree, there are no stupid questions as some people state . If someone has a question he or she just wants to know the answer
And the ones that think it is a stupid question, just don’t reply

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 11:44:46   #
Sarah in PA Loc: Breinigsville, PA
 
I don't have any more camera advice to add here, but I can commiserate with you. My parents-in-law hold all important family functions (holiday parties, anniversaries, etc) in a restaurant party room that has horrible lighting, dark burgundy linens on the tables covered with reflective plastic (ouch!) and dark burgundy drapes. And what's more, they hold them from mid-afternoon through early evening, which means I have to deal with changing light from west windows!

I'm by no means an advanced photographer, but since I have a nice camera, a Canon T1i and a speedlight, they've made me the official photographer. At the holiday party last month, I used my 18 - 55mm kit lens (it's the widest I have and they want group shots as well as candids), speedlight in the hot shoe, f/5.6, ISO 400 and a shutter of 1/80 - 1/60. The shots I got were not all as well lit as I would have liked, but at least they weren't blurry and/or grainy. I'm always trying to improve, and my goal for this year is to get my flash off the camera.

Just keep learning, experimenting, growing, and taking lots of photos!

Reply
Jan 2, 2013 11:45:22   #
sawdust3 Loc: Moline, Il 61265
 
Thanks to all. Will do as suggested and too bad somebody lost a camera sale. Thanks Dennis

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.