Could it be time to start over ...
MadMikeOne
Loc: So. NJ Shore - a bit west of Atlantic City
E.L.. Shapiro wrote:
Unless I am reading him wrongly, I think Bill is referring to the demeanor of the old posts not necessarily the content. In some cases, the gear and technology have changed but topics about aesthetics, basic theory, lighting, composition, and much more are still valid.
Frankly, as a long-time member, I am cutting down on my participation because of the protracted arguments that are ongoing.
Courticy, kindness, agreeing to disagree, clean debates, and comradery never goes out of style.
Seems folks here and everywhere are normalizing bad behavior.
Unless I am reading him wrongly, I think Bill is r... (
show quote)
Ed, that's what I understood Bill to mean, too.
And. . . I agree with your comment regarding "normalizing bad behavior". I, also, find myself spending less and less time on The Hog. That's primarily due to two reasons: 1) time constraints; 2) the increasingly argumentative, condescending tone of the responses of some of the members. Over the last year or so, I find myself spending more time on Steve Perry's site as well as some of the Nikon-centric sites.
For the most part, I've learned an enormous amount - photographically speaking, as well as having made some solid friends here, and for that I will be eternally grateful.
MadMikeOne wrote:
Ed, that's what I understood Bill to mean, too.
And. . . I agree with your comment regarding "normalizing bad behavior". I, also, find myself spending less and less time on The Hog. That's primarily due to two reasons: 1) time constraints; 2) the increasingly argumentative, condescending tone of the responses of some of the members. Over the last year or so, I find myself spending more time on Steve Perry's site as well as some of the Nikon-centric sites.
For the most part, I've learned an enormous amount - photographically speaking, as well as having made some solid friends here, and for that I will be eternally grateful.
Ed, that's what I understood Bill to mean, too. br... (
show quote)
Great comments, I could not have said it better.
Smile,
JimmyT Sends
There have been trolls, bullies and Great Truth Tellers since I joined UHH in November 2012. In January 2013, I posted a main photography discussion
topic with two questions. One question was:
Since this is my first participation in an internet forum, I'm curious to know why some feel it necessary to be rude and crude, rather than just "stepping out of the room?"In 2014 Sharpshooter wrote about creation of
The Attic, complained about vacation photos and all the gear talk. A respondent on the first page observed, "The amount of interesting information seems to be dwindling."
CHG_CANON wrote:
PLEASE DO NOT REAWAKE THESE ZOMBIE THREADS!!!!
Seemingly, some people use the cruel joke that is the UHH 'search' function to find zombie (old) topics to respond to, most always finding them years after the OP was departed active participation on UHH, if not also departing entirely this ephemeral plain.
Others clearly fat-finger the Main Discussion navigation buttons with <Last> instead of <Next>. Nothing to be found from 2011 is helpful to 2024.
N O T H I N G
PLEASE DO NOT B COLOR=RED REAWAKE THESE U ZOMBI... (
show quote)
I thought you would say nothing helpful to be found before 13 Feb 2013 :)
Schoee wrote:
I thought you would say nothing helpful to be found before 13 Feb 2013 :)
It's implied
But really, most everything after 6 months really should just be a new thread, not a zombie update.
Thank you- this was needed!
MadMikeOne wrote:
Ed, that's what I understood Bill to mean, too.
And. . . I agree with your comment regarding "normalizing bad behavior". I, also, find myself spending less and less time on The Hog. That's primarily due to two reasons: 1) time constraints; 2) the increasingly argumentative, condescending tone of the responses of some of the members. Over the last year or so, I find myself spending more time on Steve Perry's site as well as some of the Nikon-centric sites.
For the most part, I've learned an enormous amount - photographically speaking, as well as having made some solid friends here, and for that I will be eternally grateful.
Ed, that's what I understood Bill to mean, too. br... (
show quote)
Like you, I am finding UHH less and less helpful in my photographic journey. Inane arguments over gear, off topic rants, little focus on artistry. At least once a month there is a discussion on raw vs. jpeg or similar low-hanging fruit for petty argument.
What I do believe to be true is that a better moderated main site would dramatically improve the site. For instance, I started the travel section on UHH, but it competes with the main section. Travel posts are not moved from main to travel. Yet, simple display of photos are always moved to the gallery. So there is inconsistency there. If I were traveling to, say, Africa, it is not easy to put all that information together.
Could there be deep discussions disagreements on gear? Absolutely. Other sites do it well.
The culture of the site could easily be improved. I closely follow a site called Bogleheads. It is a financial site dedicated to low cost investing principles of John Bogle (Vanguard). It is very very informative. Rants and rudeness simply are not allowed. Intelligent disagreements are allowed. Name calling, idiotic gifs and photos will get a member excluded from the site. There is a "wiki" where select community members put together informative instruction, that stops the foolish rehash and arguments over various concepts. A beginner can start at the wiki, go though the documents and actually be quite educated on financial matters. It is what UHH could be with some thought.
Alas, the hands off approach to Admin on this site is probably due to the fact that the site is about clicks and advertising dollars. As the saying goes, if something is free (UHH) then you are the commodity. We are the commodity on this site, not the information presented.
Perhaps it is time to start over, but not for the reason initially presented. Because this free-for-all simply is not all that intelligent in many respects. It could be with some tweaking.
DirtFarmer
Loc: Escaped from the NYC area, back to MA
Hip Coyote wrote:
Like you, I am finding UHH less and less helpful in my photographic journey. Inane arguments over gear, off topic rants, little focus on artistry. At least once a month there is a discussion on raw vs. jpeg or similar low-hanging fruit for petty argument...
If UHH is being less helpful, that probably means you have learned a number of things from your time here and so don't need as much help. Congratulations. That sort of thing should lead you to revise your position from being a helpee to a helper. Maybe you could generate more threads on artistry.
As far as snide comments and ad hominem rants, I have found those things on all the forums I frequent. A thick skin and the ability to ignore things (and people) goes a long way.
Hip Coyote wrote:
Like you, I am finding UHH less and less helpful in my photographic journey. Inane arguments over gear, off topic rants, little focus on artistry. At least once a month there is a discussion on raw vs. jpeg or similar low-hanging fruit for petty argument.
What I do believe to be true is that a better moderated main site would dramatically improve the site. For instance, I started the travel section on UHH, but it competes with the main section. Travel posts are not moved from main to travel. Yet, simple display of photos are always moved to the gallery. So there is inconsistency there. If I were traveling to, say, Africa, it is not easy to put all that information together.
Could there be deep discussions disagreements on gear? Absolutely. Other sites do it well.
The culture of the site could easily be improved. I closely follow a site called Bogleheads. It is a financial site dedicated to low cost investing principles of John Bogle (Vanguard). It is very very informative. Rants and rudeness simply are not allowed. Intelligent disagreements are allowed. Name calling, idiotic gifs and photos will get a member excluded from the site. There is a "wiki" where select community members put together informative instruction, that stops the foolish rehash and arguments over various concepts. A beginner can start at the wiki, go though the documents and actually be quite educated on financial matters. It is what UHH could be with some thought.
Alas, the hands off approach to Admin on this site is probably due to the fact that the site is about clicks and advertising dollars. As the saying goes, if something is free (UHH) then you are the commodity. We are the commodity on this site, not the information presented.
Perhaps it is time to start over, but not for the reason initially presented. Because this free-for-all simply is not all that intelligent in many respects. It could be with some tweaking.
Like you, I am finding UHH less and less helpful i... (
show quote)
When was the last time you paid your monthly dues to fund this imaginary UHH content police force?
Hip Coyote wrote:
Like you, I am finding UHH less and less helpful in my photographic journey. Inane arguments over gear, off topic rants, little focus on artistry. At least once a month there is a discussion on raw vs. jpeg or similar low-hanging fruit for petty argument.
What I do believe to be true is that a better moderated main site would dramatically improve the site. For instance, I started the travel section on UHH, but it competes with the main section. Travel posts are not moved from main to travel. Yet, simple display of photos are always moved to the gallery. So there is inconsistency there. If I were traveling to, say, Africa, it is not easy to put all that information together.
Could there be deep discussions disagreements on gear? Absolutely. Other sites do it well.
The culture of the site could easily be improved. I closely follow a site called Bogleheads. It is a financial site dedicated to low cost investing principles of John Bogle (Vanguard). It is very very informative. Rants and rudeness simply are not allowed. Intelligent disagreements are allowed. Name calling, idiotic gifs and photos will get a member excluded from the site. There is a "wiki" where select community members put together informative instruction, that stops the foolish rehash and arguments over various concepts. A beginner can start at the wiki, go though the documents and actually be quite educated on financial matters. It is what UHH could be with some thought.
Alas, the hands off approach to Admin on this site is probably due to the fact that the site is about clicks and advertising dollars. As the saying goes, if something is free (UHH) then you are the commodity. We are the commodity on this site, not the information presented.
Perhaps it is time to start over, but not for the reason initially presented. Because this free-for-all simply is not all that intelligent in many respects. It could be with some tweaking.
Like you, I am finding UHH less and less helpful i... (
show quote)
Well said; food for thought.
Hip Coyote wrote:
...What I do believe to be true is that a better moderated main site would dramatically improve the site. For instance, I started the travel section on UHH, but it competes with the main section. Travel posts are not moved from main to travel. Yet, simple display of photos are always moved to the gallery. So there is inconsistency there...
The inconsistency is Admin/owner managed sections vs. volunteer-managed sections. It is made very clear
here that specialty sections aren't supported.
And yes, since this is a for-profit business for Admin/owner and we don't have to pay to be here, the policies will always lean in favor of where the most clicks come from, how to increase clicks and so forth.
CHG_CANON wrote:
When was the last time you paid your monthly dues to fund this imaginary UHH content police force?
Wouldn't need much policing, more like housekeeping. If Admin moves photos out of Main to Gallery, why can't he move travel questions to the Travel section?
(Edit: Just saw Linda's post. It answers my "rhetorical" question!
)
srt101fan wrote:
Wouldn't need much policing, more like housekeeping. If Admin moves photos out of Main to Gallery, why can't he move travel questions to the Travel section?
See what I wrote just above.
you got that right, seems now it's about snide remarks and no real educating topics. Alot of bickering about BS , this site is going down hill as far as photography discussions.
Juy wrote:
you got that right, seems now it's about snide remarks and no real educating topics. Alot of bickering about BS , this site is going down hill as far as photography discussions.
I pointed out that this has been the norm since I joined in 2012. See my comment with link to a question I posed in January 2014.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.