You Own Nothing (Page 2): Facts such as these are meaningless to left wing judges and prosecutors. :sm24: :sm24:...

FrumCA

Racmanaz wrote:

Wanna bet? br br Just take a close loom at some... (show quote)

Facts such as these are meaningless to left wing judges and prosecutors.

FrumCA

dennis2146 wrote:

https://www.townhallmail.com/jbthbpdthhqwbthtwtbjdwzmmnwmmtndffjpkbqbrrbfsjb_drrphssghhjftdgsjrjtgg.html?a=b2e3dd7593a75ac3959f6457b1e7d38ad454dacb651fe4e078cbaa8719a91b3b&b=23880339

Dennis

Excellent!! This is a keeper.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

dennis2146 wrote:

Oh my my aren’t you out early this morning spreadi... (show quote)

So now you claiming a victim in the future tense - what might happen not what “ did “ happen
Obeying the law is not a right or . issue

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

smf85 wrote:

…

You do bring out a good point though - the system is built on trust and there aren’t a whole lot of safeguards built in. Yes, as you said, “shame on them” is very much the case here. Fraud has been an issue that has plagued the whole system from the beginning. I haven’t seen any good solution for it that maintained the market successfully.

To see the end result of misrepresentation of property values one merely has to go back 20 years to the days preceding the near collapse of the American evonomy.

Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.

DennyT wrote:

To see the end result of misrepresentation of property values one merely has to go back 20 years to the days preceding the near collapse of the American evonomy.

That wasn’t misrepresentation of property values, that was misrepresenting who should even own a home in the government’s social engineering scheme (everyone should own a home) and then borrowers using their inflated equity as credit cards (refinancing). That couples with a bit of predatory lending and wala.

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

Effate wrote:

That wasn’t misrepresentation of property values, that was misrepresenting who should even own a home in the government’s social engineering scheme (everyone should own a home) and then borrowers using their inflated equity as credit cards (refinancing). That couples with a bit of predatory lending and wala.

T
Baloney … look at an appraisers .
Quote trying to blame everything on the government.
To educate yourself type “ 2008 inflated appraisals “””” in google search box

But you’re partly on the money when you stated “””” borrowers using their inflated equity as credit cards (refinancing)”” sound familiar for: trump.

That’s why we have laws.

smf85 Loc: Freeport, IL

Effate wrote:

Based on trust you say. When is the last time you purchased a home and the bank “trusted” you application without verifying?

Actually there’s quite a bit that is trusted to be true by the underwriters. Although that generally isn’t visible to the retail consumer. Two critical pieces of the process are taken on trust - your credit report and the property appraisal. The underwriting agent doesn’t validate either - they’re accepted on their face. And they’re sometimes wrong.

Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.

smf85 wrote:

Actually there’s quite a bit that is trusted to be true by the underwriters. Although that generally isn’t visible to the retail consumer. Two critical pieces of the process are taken on trust - your credit report and the property appraisal. The underwriting agent doesn’t validate either - they’re accepted on their face. And they’re sometimes wrong.

That may be true but either one of your examples, if gotten wrong, doesn’t mean I committed fraud. In my personal experience every property I have purchased the appraisal was done by someone employed/contracted by the lending institution.

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

DennyT wrote:

So now you claiming a victim in the future tense - what might happen not what “ did “ happen
Obeying the law is not a right or . issue

What the HELL are you talking about. Laws are created to protect citizens. Of course the laws do not protect citizens in the past tense for the most part do they.

You have just provided proof of your inability to understand simple sentences. Everything I posted is true and anybody with a working brain would understand that is true. But here comes little denny who has to have proof of even the sun rising every day. Be SPECIFIC little denny. Point out exactly what your problem is; show me where I am lying about anything. Your lack of common sense is very enlightening to the rest of us even those on the Left who must also be shaking their heads right now saying to themselves, WTH is little denny thinking of? Of course laws are written to protect the rest of us from speeders, drug abusers and so on.

Here is a large part of what your brain is not able to keep up with. Obeying the laws for common good is a RESPONSIBILITY each of us is charged with for the protection of all of us. It IS an ISSUE though you can't seem to fathom how important an issue it really is. What if all of us drove at high speed with no concern for the safety of others? What if all of us were drug abusers and could not work reliably in high pressure jobs or where the safety of others is concerned. Would you be concerned knowing one of your airline pilots was under the influence of alcohol and the other was stoned out of his mind on heroin and was nodding off?

Are you at all capable of reading posts from others to understand what is being said without jumping to political snap judgements and coming back in a frenzied attack? Are you able to post back with a thoughtful reply ever? It seems you cannot.

Dennis

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

DennyT wrote:

To see the end result of misrepresentation of property values one merely has to go back 20 years to the days preceding the near collapse of the American evonomy.

Yeah little denny, brought about by the corrupt Left who told people with no money they could afford high priced homes when it was obvious they could not.

Dennis

FrumCA

Racmanaz wrote:

Wanna bet? br br Just take a close loom at some... (show quote)

There is a property currently for sale in Naples, Florida for $295M. Considering it’s not Trump, what price tag would the judge or prosecutor put on this property? Would they accept it as a legitimate asking price or rule it is intentionally inflated?

dennis2146 Loc: Eastern Idaho

FrumCA wrote:

There is a property currently for sale in Naples, Florida for $295M. Considering it’s not Trump, what price tag would the judge or prosecutor put on this property? Would they accept it as a legitimate asking price or rule it is intentionally inflated?

I can't help but wonder when the charges will be filed against that realtor, equality under the law for all, thoughts of course. Oh wait...the recent applications ONLY apply to Trump and are ONLY applied by those on the Left side of the aisle. Funny how that works out for the Left to limit political opponents and who Conservatives can vote for.

Dennis

DennyT Loc: Central Missouri woods

FrumCA wrote:

There is a property currently for sale in Naples, Florida for $295M. Considering it’s not Trump, what price tag would the judge or prosecutor put on this property? Would they accept it as a legitimate asking price or rule it is intentionally inflated?

Let’s not forget the trump evaluation was based on dividing the property and Serling individual parcels. The local zoning board say no to change in zoning . Allowed use of property is a Bigly difference in valuation .

Effate Loc: El Dorado Hills, Ca.

DennyT wrote:

Let’s not forget the trump evaluation was based on dividing the property and Serling individual parcels. The local zoning board say no to change in zoning . Allowed use of property is a Bigly difference in valuation .

Fact is, look what Larry Ellison paid for his Palm Beach estate, there are properties smaller and less significant that have fetched almost 200 million

cwp3420

DennyT wrote:

Let’s not forget the trump evaluation was based on dividing the property and Serling individual parcels. The local zoning board say no to change in zoning . Allowed use of property is a Bigly difference in valuation .

WTH is Serling individual parcels?