Royal baby is on the way ... whole world atwitter
JR1
Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
Are you kidding, who the H**L cares
JR
UK
Blimey! We've had our first response from the UK.
It was inevitable, just sooner rather than later. We have the prelim. to our budget on Wednesday-more pain and no gain- as usual. So its a bit of good news.
We would not have been informed at this early stage had the Mum to Be not been taken into hospital with a nasty form of morning sickness - shame.
All babies are precious, and the parents are to be congratulated. It's just funny how we usually treat babies of royalty and other famous people as something different, and better than the children of the rest of us peons.
Mac
Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
Who cares really? We stopped being British Subjects a couple of centuries ago.
Pepper
Loc: Planet Earth Country USA
I'm as excited for them as they would be for me.
Bmac
Loc: Long Island, NY
Mac wrote:
Who cares really? We stopped being British Subjects a couple of centuries ago.
True Mac, now we are Chinese subjects. 8-)
過得去|过得去
過得去|过得去
JR1
Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
Mac wrote:
Who cares really? We stopped being British Subjects a couple of centuries ago.
A1
There are many babies being delivered to mothers and families every day who are starving, this child will be pampered every day of it's life, not it's fault but I care more about the less fortunate ones.
People say "Isn't the queen and Charles great for their age" the B*****y well should be, the best doctors money can buy.
Shame, morning sickness, well duh......
Oh the poor girl when it is all over send them to the caribbean and get a nanny for the baby, I wont be able to sleep at night until i hear she is ok.
What a set of sick replies. Would you be as offensive if she was a member of your family?
The girl, married to a royal and having a baby, is news. She is ill with a nasty form of morning sickness and has had to be hospitalised.
If you can't say anything good why write at all?
You may not like the royals but who would you replace them with as head of state? President David Cameron - I think not.
JR1
Loc: Tavistock, Devon, UK
Terfyn wrote:
What a set of sick replies. Would you be as offensive if she was a member of your family?
The girl, married to a royal and having a baby, is news. She is ill with a nasty form of morning sickness and has had to be hospitalised.
If you can't say anything good why write at all?
You may not like the royals but who would you replace them with as head of state? President David Cameron - I think not.
She is not part of a "normal" family she is pampered from birth to death and unlike the many she will not know hunger, homelessness, trying to pay rent and feed a family etc.
And that is the view of 33% of the UK a large proportion, just that you don't hear from them.
I write because it is a forum, what right do you have to state that only GOOD comments rather than real f peoples thoughts here are not valid.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.