Leo_B
Loc: Houston suburb
The writer of the article you posted missed one of the biggest things in the hearing. After Cruz got him to admit they were coming for our AR-15s Tom Cotton got him to admit that he would define assault weapons as virtually any weapon with a larger caliber than a .22 that had a magazine.
That is virtually all modern rifles.
Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable and strongly Right Biased, based on story selection that always favors the right and use of emotionally loaded (sensationalized) headlines. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and several failed fact checks. (7/19/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 2/05/2021)
Leo_B
Loc: Houston suburb
Just because you don't like them, big surprise, doesn't mean it isn't accurate and true in this case.
Leo_B wrote:
Just because you don't like them, big surprise, doesn't mean it isn't accurate and true in this case.
I am not saying that it isn't true but couldn't the truth be
found at a center bias site instead of going to a site that
is known to lie and put out BS conspiracies?
Leo_B
Loc: Houston suburb
That is the link to information I received. I know the issue and a fair number of the players and found the information reliable and accurate. I don't need another source. You are welcome to search out other sources if you wish. It won't change the situation or the illegal and despicable position of the left.
Kraken wrote:
I am not saying that it isn't true but couldn't the truth be
found at a center bias site instead of going to a site that
is known to lie and put out BS conspiracies?
There is no center bias site. Quit drinking your Kool Aid and wake up to the 21st century.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
Kraken wrote:
Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable and strongly Right Biased, based on story selection that always favors the right and use of emotionally loaded (sensationalized) headlines. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and several failed fact checks. (7/19/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 2/05/2021)
Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable ... (
show quote)
Your treply is either total bull, or a flat out lie. I heard him say that he will confiscate any weapon with larger than 22 caliber and a clip. I HEARD HIM SAY THAT
If he wants to confiscate all long guns that are magazine fed and have larger bores than .22 caliber, all you AR-15 aficionados are safe since the weapon most maligned is also chambered for a .22 caliber bullet.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
Alafoto wrote:
If he wants to confiscate all long guns that are magazine fed and have larger bores than .22 caliber, all you AR-15 aficionados are safe since the weapon most maligned is also chambered for a .22 caliber bullet.
Your ignorance is showing. The AR 15 is .223 caliber NOT .22 If you think it doesn't make a difference? A .223 won't fit in a .22 reciever. It will jam
boberic wrote:
Your ignorance is showing. The AR 15 is .223 caliber NOT .22 If you think it doesn't make a difference? A .223 won't fit in a .22 reciever. It will jam
Yes, I am aware that .223 caliber rounds, or 5.56 mm will not chamber in a rifle chambered for a lowly .22 long rifle round. It won't jam because it would be physically impossible to even get one into the chamber area of the weapon. However, my point was not that the rounds are interchangeable, but that to simply prohibit rifles by bore diameter leaves a large loophole to be exploited.
Does your great knowledge of firearms extend to other misstatements of bore diameter? Did you know that the once very popular .38 special has an actual bore diameter of .357 inches, or that the .44 magnum and the .44 special have an actual bore diameter of .429 inches? How about this? Did you know that 9 mm Parabellum actually is .354 inches. Lotta shorthand in the firearms world. You actual show your own ignorance with that "it will jam" statement.
Kraken wrote:
Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable and strongly Right Biased, based on story selection that always favors the right and use of emotionally loaded (sensationalized) headlines. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and several failed fact checks. (7/19/2016) Updated (D. Van Zandt 2/05/2021)
Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable ... (
show quote)
And once again you are playing the fool by failing to acknowledge what Chipman actually said. The source that reports this is irrelevant. It must suck to continually shoot yourself in the foot.
FrumCA wrote:
And once again you are playing the fool by failing to acknowledge what Chipman actually said. The source that reports this is irrelevant. It must suck to continually shoot yourself in the foot.
You are just too damned thickheaded to talk to.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.