boberic wrote:
Your treply is either total bull, or a flat out lie. I heard him say that he will confiscate any weapon with larger than 22 caliber and a clip. I HEARD HIM SAY THAT
You are too thickheaded to talk to. You just waste my time.
Kraken wrote:
They are under the "C".
After seeing this chart many times, I've come to the conclusion that it is helpful to those who wish others to tell them what to read or not read, and to those who desire to keep people from reading what they want and making up their own minds.
Not only is this an un-American concept, it comes right from the Dark Ages when the Church didn't want the people reading the Bible.
Kraken wrote:
You are too thickheaded to talk to. You just waste my time.
Better to "waste" one person's time...then "waste" EVERBODY'S time....get dressed krack...go outside, work on your "wood puzzles"....
captivecookie wrote:
After seeing this chart many times, I've come to the conclusion that it is helpful to those who wish others to tell them what to read or not read, and to those who desire to keep people from reading what they want and making up their own minds.
Not only is this an un-American concept, it comes right from the Dark Ages when the Church didn't want the people reading the Bible.
Ever since Nov. 3rd. 2015 I have come to the conclusion that there are
way too many people out there that can't think for themselves or even think at all.
Kraken wrote:
You are too thickheaded to talk to. You just waste my time.
You actually waste your own time posting what everyone is already aware of.
Kraken wrote:
Ever since Nov. 3rd. 2015 I have come to the conclusion that there are
way too many people out there that can't think for themselves or even think at all.
Every one of those folks are Progressives, they are all chasing the same imaginary carrot.
Kraken wrote:
You are just too damned thickheaded to talk to.
What's so thickheaded about calling you out for your nonsense? Your meaningless bias posts contribute Nothing. Nada. Zero. to the conversation.
FrumCA wrote:
What's so thickheaded about calling you out for your nonsense? Your meaningless bias posts contribute Nothing. Nada. Zero. to the conversation.
I have explained more times than I can count and yet you
still don't have a clue. If that isn't thickheadedness on your
part I don't know what is.
Kraken wrote:
I have explained more times than I can count and yet you
still don't have a clue. If that isn't thickheadedness on your
part I don't know what is.
Oh, I have read your "explanations" but they haven't and don't explain squat. You just make up lame excuses and deflections. If you had any meaningful input on the subject matter rather than the source your stupid little media bias offerings convey, there might be some relevance to your comments. But you don't. I think you are much smarter than you let on but you continue to play the fool.
Kraken wrote:
Ever since Nov. 3rd. 2015 I have come to the conclusion that there are
way too many people out there that can't think for themselves or even think at all.
Yes, unfortunately I think that's true. Jordan Peterson often laments in his interviews that many of us don't really know how to think.
JohnFrim
Loc: Somewhere in the Great White North.
trainspotter wrote:
NO body cares krack....
Now THERE'S a very mature and info-contributing response!
Let me add meaningfully to the "discussion"...
First pic...
Did you forget to flush your latest dump?
Is that the best you have to offer the discussion?
How talented you are to get that curly on top, like a Dairy Queen serving! Do you do that by sliding around on the seat, or can you do it simply with sphincter control? (Asking for DJT.)
Second pic...
Self-portrait, I assume?
Are you suffering butt-hurt?
Try Pr********n-H.
boberic
Loc: Quiet Corner, Connecticut. Ex long Islander
Alafoto wrote:
Yes, I am aware that .223 caliber rounds, or 5.56 mm will not chamber in a rifle chambered for a lowly .22 long rifle round. It won't jam because it would be physically impossible to even get one into the chamber area of the weapon. However, my point was not that the rounds are interchangeable, but that to simply prohibit rifles by bore diameter leaves a large loophole to be exploited.
Does your great knowledge of firearms extend to other misstatements of bore diameter? Did you know that the once very popular .38 special has an actual bore diameter of .357 inches, or that the .44 magnum and the .44 special have an actual bore diameter of .429 inches? How about this? Did you know that 9 mm Parabellum actually is .354 inches. Lotta shorthand in the firearms world. You actual show your own ignorance with that "it will jam" statement.
Yes, I am aware that .223 caliber rounds, or 5.56 ... (
show quote)
The issue is that the biden appointee to head the ATF wants to ban virtually ALL sporting rifles. He is an ignorant fool. He won't or can't define an 'assault" weapon. Probably doesn't know that sharp instruments-and hands and blunt objects k**l far more people than ALL long guns put together.
boberic wrote:
The issue is that the biden appointee to head the ATF wants to ban virtually ALL sporting rifles. He is an ignorant fool. He won't or can't define an 'assault" weapon. Probably doesn't know that sharp instruments-and hands and blunt objects k**l far more people than ALL long guns put together.
Then define it for everybody and end the ongoing delaying tactic of dissonance.
DennyT
Loc: Central Missouri woods
btbg wrote:
The writer of the article you posted missed one of the biggest things in the hearing. After Cruz got him to admit they were coming for our AR-15s Tom Cotton got him to admit that he would define assault weapons as virtually any weapon with a larger caliber than a .22 that had a magazine.
That is virtually all modern rifles.
Chipman said
“””” Read more:
https://www.ammoland.com/2021/05/chipman-confirms-i-support-a-ban-on-americas-most-popular-rifle/#ixzz6wCd0SDWw Under Creative Commons License: Attribution
Follow us: @Ammoland on Twitter | Ammoland on Facebook
With respect to the AR-15, I support a ban as has been presented in a Senate bill and supported by the president. ””
He never said anything about confiscation or taking legal owners guns.
The bill senate bil 736 is a ban on the sale of
Leo_B
Loc: Houston suburb
DennyT wrote:
With respect to the AR-15, I support a ban as has been presented in a Senate bill and supported by the president. ””
He never said anything about confiscation or taking legal owners guns.
The bill senate bil 736 is a ban on the sale of
Such a ban will have ZERO impact other than infringing on the rights of honest citizens. That's the only goal of the left, to infringe on the honest citizens until they completely eliminate the 2A. They don't even care about those being hurt and k**led. Those victims are a benefit to their mission. It isn't completely unreasonable to think the left allows such attacks at times for the 'greater good' of their 2A cancellation campaign. You know, like allowing B******i and things of that sort.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.