thom w wrote:
"which as far as anyone on this forum know have not even been used in any crimes at this point in time"
Unless you have surveyed everyone on this forum, you can't know this.
Have you seen anyone on this thread claim that pistol braces are a crime problem? I thought not. There have been days of this thread. Not one person has even attempted to link pistol braces to crime. You and I both know that if anyone on the left had data that showed they are linked to crime they would have jumped on that. So, what exactly is wrong with my statement
Leo_B wrote:
I've driven manual steering. I prefer power steering. Just as I'd prefer having a pistol brace to not. I should have both choices freely at my discretion. There is no legitimate reason to restrict me in either way. Just as there is no legitimate reason to restrict any of the other multi-multi-multi-millions of honest citizens. None whatsoever.
I wouldn't want to drive a modern car without power steering, but the cars of the 50s 60s and 70s some of them are a joy to drive without power steering.
I personally don't like pistol braces, but they sure help my wife shoot better. If I got used to one it might improve my accuracy as well. Don't know, I just don't find them to be comfortable. But, I believe that each person should have the right to chose whether or not they want to use one.
boberic wrote:
The issue is that the biden appointee to head the ATF wants to ban virtually ALL sporting rifles. He is an ignorant fool. He won't or can't define an 'assault" weapon. Probably doesn't know that sharp instruments-and hands and blunt objects k**l far more people than ALL long guns put together.
Could you point us to where they wanna ban all sporting guns
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.