New photographic technology is tethered to advancements within the AI community, processor speeds and capability, sensor advancements and lastly, what the consumer can afford. As processing speeds increase and resolution advances, the development issue will be heat. A good example is the Canon C200 and C300 video cameras. They operate with a fan to cool the processors. Mirrorless cameras have had their issues with heat due to higher processing speeds and processing volume. Cameras, like everything else, depends on good physics.
This posting is great, a simple question about the next obsession became in itself the obsession. Thanks for thinking about this. BTW I also like filters, it makes me feel better knowing that I can throw them away if they become damaged; the alternative of fixing a $2,000 lens makes it obvious. Lets not start the filter discussion again, it’s like politics; everyone is right (no pun intended)
Delderby wrote:
No - neither do I wish to be argumentative. Really I was suggesting an alternative to filters. Glad to hear you do use lens hoods. I have not considered that lenses might be damaged by too much cleaning, but I have heard that filters, except for those costing as much as a lens, reduce IQ.
When I check ebay or other sites to purchase lenses I sometimes see where the seller says there are scratches, scuffs or marks from over cleaning. I do agree about using quality filters.
I don’t think I have ever seen a photo degraded by use of any filter of poor quality. I would like to sometime see a difference. I am not saying it can’t happen at all. But consider that there are many lenses that are scuffed and scratched, have dust inside or some other optical ailment that will still take beautiful photographs. It is hard for me to think a filter will show much depreciation in image quality.
Have a great day,
Dennis
lamiaceae wrote:
He (Rongnongno) is referring to the repeated post topics on here that get very old, pointless and some nearly idiotic. It is sarcasm. And he is right on. Read the thread from the beginning, please!
It may surprise you to know I DID read from the beginning just as I surmise you did. My comment is based only on his word, obsession. Yes I know these topics come up frequently, all of them. But I see nobody obsessed with them.
I appreciate your comment.
Dennis
dennis2146 wrote:
I think your entire post is wrong from the word obsession. I use filters on my lenses to protect the glass. I am in no way obsessed and feel I MUST use a filter. I think it is a good idea. Rather than clean the camera glass numerous times I can clean the glass of the cheaper filter. For my money pictures are just as clear and sharp taken through a filter as when no filter is used.
Everything else you mention is simply a choice all of us make or not. And if we do make a choice either way many of us choose differently the next day for a different photograph. I have never met even one person who is obsessed with anything on your list. We like those things or we do not. No big deal either way.
Dennis
I think your entire post is wrong from the word ob... (
show quote)
The "obsession" reference isn't for using filters........
how about back button focus
So what about post processing vs SOOC? Or digital vs film? Or any "vs"?
I am a retired IT Manager who entered the field in "the old days when we had to write code to get things done" Nowadays complex stuff happens at the mouse click. Progress Progress it's all good. Instead of smelly chemicals, we use computer mice to do the "heavy lifting". Progress is good!!!
cbtsam wrote:
So what about post processing vs SOOC? Or digital vs film? Or any "vs"?
I think we've probably run off all the SOOC hold outs ...
Rongnongno wrote:
Things come and go, some linger for a long time or return to haunt us and others are just a blink.
We have had:
Filter use as protection (recurring)
Bokeh
HDR
Stacking
Stitching
Noise (recurring)
File format choice (recurring)
Sky replacement
....
What will be the next one?
Hey, how about you take a picture and the camera spits out a print, oh wait that might have been done before.
Longshadow wrote:
So individual volition goes away.
The computer will tell you what is good,
And everyone will like it.
So who's really winning the "photo contest"?
The photographer or the computer.
Hmmmm. The “rise of the machines”?
Tell your camera to “go out to [GPS Coordinates] and take [n] pictures”. Or run your camera from home with your AI headset. Sit back and have the AI editor crop, sharpen, adjust color and ZAP! All done.
Who needs an actual artist?
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.