Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Aperture priority and shutter speed
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
May 15, 2020 01:40:42   #
dickwilber Loc: Indiana (currently)
 
My experience was with sports at the end of the film era and the beginning of the digital world. I had learned to shoot manual long before and that worked well in constant conditions or when there was sufficient adjustment time between shots. But in the heat of action with scattered clouds, or, worse, the action going from sun to shade and back indiscriminately, auto exposure was an absolute blessing. I shot ISO 400 film except for extreme conditions, and with those early digital cameras, ISO 400 was pretty much where you wanted to be. I learned to shoot my Nikons (N8008, F3, F100, D100, D70, D200) on Aperture preferred, keeping an eye out for unsustainable shutter speeds. It worked extremely well, particularly with my f/2.8 lenses which I could shoot wide open. In bright mid-day light, I'd close down the aperture one or two stops and have the best of all worlds.

Today, with the high ISO capability and Auto ISO variability of modern DSLR's, I would think setting both your optimum aperture and shutter speed and allowing the ISO to automatically adjust for the light variations would provide the best combination for most conditions. In any case, you must have a firm handle on what your comfort range is, and know how you will modify your settings when you exceed that range. (I have to admit that I have not yet explored the possibilities sufficiently to know what my Auto ISO comfort range is in all conditions.)

Reply
May 15, 2020 04:36:41   #
joer Loc: Colorado/Illinois
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
"So many wildlife photographers swear by Aperture priority mode" - I would like to know who -- and why.

Once I learned about auto ISO, I never found a reason to photograph wildlife differently: for quickly changing lighting conditions or when the animal/bird's movement cannot be predicted, I set aperture and shutter speed via manual controls, and then auto ISO.

For a lion asleep in a zoo enclosure, aperture priority would work
i "So many wildlife photographers swear by A... (show quote)




The only way to shoot, unless in a studio.

Reply
May 15, 2020 06:36:35   #
User ID
 
MountainDave wrote:
I know Tom Mangelsen, among others, uses Av mostly. The reason is pretty simple: aperture affects the "look" of your image more than any other parameter. ...............


Sometimes thaz true. Sometimes NOT ! Certainly IS true if the subject is not in motion ... and acoarst NOT true at all for fast action subjects. How speed or motion is rendered is more eye catching than any visible effects of aperture size. Be wary of blanket statements.

OTOH no problem with A-mode for action subjects. With analog controls I really prefer using the aperture ring on the lens to control shutter speed. It’s so much easier to use that ring on the lens barrel than to change my grip to twiddle the shutter dial on the top plate. (Nikomats and OMs has a good solution.)

Reply
 
 
May 15, 2020 16:41:58   #
RWR Loc: La Mesa, CA
 
RahulKhosla wrote:
I have been following Steve Perry's advice on Manual mode + auto ISO so far but am curious about how Aperture priority would work for situations where the subject is moving quickly (eg BIF or a tiger chasing a deer) and so you need pretty high shutter speeds to avoid motion blur (say 1/2000 - 1/4000).

So many wildlife photographers swear by Aperture priority mode and I can certainly see the logic in terms of having to fiddle with one less variable (shutter speed which the camera controls).

However, if I need reasonable DoF AND and I also simultaneously need high shutter speed, then a higher F stop to provide more DoF would automatically slow down the shutter speed, wouldn't it? And thus create the very motion blur that I want to avoid?

Cranking up the ISO or EV could be a solution but would love to hear advice on this.
I have been following Steve Perry's advice on Manu... (show quote)

Anyone capable of doing their own thinking ought to try the different methods and decide for themselves which is best for what, rather than concerning themselves about, or trying to copy, what others do.

Reply
May 15, 2020 16:49:40   #
via the lens Loc: Northern California, near Yosemite NP
 
Most wildlife photographers want a blurred background, which is what you get when you set your aperture to its widest setting, in my case f/5.6 on a Nikon 200-500 lens. Wildlife photographers also want a fast shutter speed, and fast can vary from subject to subject, so again they set their aperture wide open or nearly so to obtain a fast shutter speed. The only caveat when using using auto-ISO is to remember that when you switch to a slow-moving subject you can actually use a lower ISO because you don't need that fast of a shutter speed, if you can remember this then using auto-ISO is great.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.