Agricultural Landscape: after the hops harvest
Jan 27, 2020 09:35:21 #
AzPicLady wrote:
I tried a bit of unsharp mask on this after my "how do I sharpen" topic in PP Forum. The previous post of this hops pic to UHH is in the link below (a lot of changes, for sure I agree with Andy. The design of the poles and how they catch the light is mesmerizing. Then that slanted pole shows up and jars me right back to reality. I like that the mountain is there, but doesn't interfere with the poles. It has been awhile since I saw the original post, but somehow I think one is better.
):https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-499016-1.html
I appreciate your feedback, Kathy!
Jan 27, 2020 09:36:32 #
camerapapi wrote:
Delighted to know you enjoyed, William. Thank you!Linda, nothing wrong with your shot that I find and interesting one. The image works well because of the pattern of repetition. The exposure is fine, the subject interesting and that pole to the left brakes the patterns of the vertical poles to add interest.
A great shot.
A great shot.
Jan 27, 2020 09:41:02 #
joehel2 wrote:
Funny, I was wondering “am I the only one that sees a dual-frequency sinusoidal waveform here”?
No - you are not the only one - although I would not have known what to call it - it certainly looked as if it belonged on an electronic screen
Jan 27, 2020 10:08:31 #
Linda, I did some side by side comparisons with the original. What's strange is that it's more dense with more contrast, and normally I like that. But the newer one with the lighter look is actually better IIMO. Cropping (or cloning?) out those top wires really made a difference. The new one looks more abstract. and I like abstract.
Jan 27, 2020 10:17:55 #
AzPicLady wrote:
I think the crop (or lack thereof) is nearly the same; you just can't see the very top wires as well in this re-do. I have the same feeling as you about the "lighter" look, especially the sky.Linda, I did some side by side comparisons with the original. What's strange is that it's more dense with more contrast, and normally I like that. But the newer one with the lighter look is actually better IIMO. Cropping (or cloning?) out those top wires really made a difference. The new one looks more abstract. and I like abstract.
Thanks again Kathy!
Jan 27, 2020 15:09:34 #
I think the diagonal pole in the foreground, on the left conflicts from an otherwise interesting pattern.
Jan 27, 2020 15:43:56 #
mdpathjp wrote:
Thanks very much for your time and input, appreciated!I think the diagonal pole in the foreground, on the left conflicts from an otherwise interesting pattern.
Jan 27, 2020 17:10:08 #
TheShoe
Loc: Lacey, WA
Nice pattern shot, Linda. On my Dell P2715Q, the picture nearly filled the width (about 1/2 inch on each side) and was over the height by about 1.5 inches.
Jan 27, 2020 17:20:24 #
Jan 27, 2020 17:24:13 #
bertloomis
Loc: Fort Worth, Texas
It is a pleasant photograph. I did not have to zoom of change browser to see it all.
Jan 27, 2020 17:55:01 #
TheShoe, Mark, Bert - thank you all very much for commenting and for letting me know about image size on your devices. Greatly appreciated.
Jan 27, 2020 20:29:01 #
Love this image, and this processing. I remember seeing a number of these, but pretty sure this was one of them. The processing on this one appears to outclass the previous one by leaps and bounds. About the leaning pole. Its like the one soldier that isn't at attention. Without him we would be more apt to take all the perfect ones for granted.
Jan 27, 2020 20:38:52 #
Jan 27, 2020 22:21:24 #
Linda From Maine wrote:
This is a new edit of a 2017 photo. I'm also tryin... (show quote)
Hello Linda, I really like your photo, there is something besides the patterns and the pale blue sky that compels me to keep looking. Maybe its the wires and the remains of previous growth or the earth piled up around the poles, what ever it is I like it. It would be good to visit again when the crops start to grow. Also I did have to scroll a little to see the entire image when I enlarged it. Regards, TD
Jan 28, 2020 07:46:22 #
fergmark wrote:
How perfectly you described the impact of the pole. Thank you so very much, Mark.Love this image, and this processing. I remember seeing a number of these, but pretty sure this was one of them. The processing on this one appears to outclass the previous one by leaps and bounds. About the leaning pole. Its like the one soldier that isn't at attention. Without him we would be more apt to take all the perfect ones for granted.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.