Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
One Reason Why Republicans Lost the Presidential Election
Page <<first <prev 3 of 19 next> last>>
Dec 10, 2012 09:14:03   #
George H Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
Richard94611 wrote:
Isn't that just wonderful that there are so many Republican governors ? All I care about is that we now have a TOTALLY Democratic state government, from Governor and Legislature down, and are pulling out of the economic problems Bush's policies caused. No, I take that back. I am also eager to see Obama kick ass now that he doesn't have to worry about reelection politics. Where California goes -- upwards into much better things under Brown -- the rest of the nation will soon follow, except of course for some of the really backward states like Alabama and Texas.

What has begun to amaze me is the enormous amount that Obama actually accomplished during his first three years of the presidency. Read all about it in The New New Deal. Most of the telling of this was lost in the lying static Romney and the Republicans did, but these facts are now beginning to become evident.

Get used to Obama, because he is here for another 4 years plus, and now he will really kick ass.


Bmac wrote:
Richard94611 wrote:
their political party is falling to pieces beneath their very feet,.......


The Republicans control the House of Representatives.

The Republicans presently have 30 governors compared to the Democrats 20. There are 27 Republican-controlled State Legislatures (both houses) compared to 15 Democratic-controlled Legislatures.

There are presently 22 Republican-controlled state governments, meaning control of the governor's office and both chambers of the legislature, compared to 11 for the Democrats.

Hardly a political party falling to pieces. Ironic that this poor party, in such dire straits, is used by so many as the new excuse for Obama's failed policies. So weak, and yet so powerful? Maybe it is due to Obama's weak leadership, otherwise how could such a destroyed party inhibit him? 8-)
quote=Richard94611 their political party is falli... (show quote)
Isn't that just wonderful that there are so many R... (show quote)


Richard,
Are you working, do you collect a paycheck, if you do please tell us if you like what is coming down the pike in January? Obama has done many things, He is going on a 4 million vacation while the country has a fiscal problem, and you say the Reps are out of touch? This man has created more division in this country than any president including Bush. Have you ever read any of the Affordable Health Care Act?

George

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 09:15:49   #
Frank3z
 
Seems like common sense that if you ignore or insult a particular group, they just might throw their support in your general direction.

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 09:17:03   #
ole sarg Loc: south florida
 
Richard all that is true. However, you forgot to mention that those statistics are the result of the Bush Administration's policies.

History did not start with President OBama's first term.

The above is something the American public realized in this last election.

As for control of the House that is because of gerrymandering by republican state houses. Also, not that the most backward states are those overwhelming controlled by the GOP!

You have a specious argument.

Reply
Check out Drone Video and Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 10, 2012 09:26:02   #
George H Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
reindeer wrote:
As a non-US secular person I was relieved that the world was saved from another war in the middle east and the inevitable crimes aganst humanity. Obama is slightly more sane.i


Reindeer,
The animosity that exists in the ME is not gone, have you really watched the ME for any time, do you even understand the ramifications of what is occurring? Obama is part of the problem in the ME, he sends convoluted ideas, the Arab world does not know where he stands, and neither does Israel.

George

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 09:29:54   #
George H Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
ole sarg wrote:
Richard all that is true. However, you forgot to mention that those statistics are the result of the Bush Administration's policies.

History did not start with President OBama's first term.

The above is something the American public realized in this last election.

As for control of the House that is because of gerrymandering by republican state houses. Also, not that the most backward states are those overwhelming controlled by the GOP!

You have a specious argument.


Ole Sarg.
I would suggest you do a little more research, since your comment they are backward is pure BS. Lowest unemployment in the country is what state? Please your lack of research is apparent. OH and do you work, tell me how you like bringing home less next year.

George

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 09:31:56   #
imntrt1 Loc: St. Louis
 
Richard94611 wrote:
You had better do a little study on what Obama has accomplished. It is all listed for everyone to see in the book The New New Deal. It takes more than 3 1/2 years to clean up the mess W caused -- a good deal of which is set out there -- especially with Republican obstructionists trying to prevent the solving of many of these problems. For example, preventing passage of the jobs bill, which probably would have put a million Americans back to work.

Please recall the stated Republican object: to prevent Obama from having a second term. Well, get used to it, because you Republicans lost the presidential election. Now we will see some real butt kicking !
You had better do a little study on what Obama has... (show quote)


The "Real Butt Kicking" of the American Public.

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 09:40:41   #
charlie Loc: Minneapolis, Minnesota
 
Where's Rixprix ??? He usually has a bipartisan opinion. Why haven't we heard from him? Come on ole sarg,, bring out your troops. richardxxxxx is a very weak troll, he needs help.

We lost, we all lost. I'm over it.

Reply
Check out True Macro-Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 10, 2012 09:51:25   #
George H Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
charlie wrote:
Where's Rixprix ??? He usually has a bipartisan opinion. Why haven't we heard from him? Come on ole sarg,, bring out your troops. richardxxxxx is a very weak troll, he needs help.

We lost, we all lost. I'm over it.


Charlie,
It is apparent that many believe that Republicans want the President to fail, I don't, I would hope he starts to realize what his policies are doing. To wish him to fail is to wish the country harm, and that is not what is wished at all.

George

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 10:02:29   #
SeaChelle Loc: Boston area
 
Richard94611 wrote:
You are absolutely wrong about this. There has been a block by Republicans in the California legislature for a number of years. Time and time again the Republicans have prevented progressive legislation that the Democrats wanted. May I remind you that some types of legislation require a 2/3 (or is it just 60% ? I forget which.) majority. This is what the Republicans have voted against and prevented from being put into law. Perhaps you are just unfamiliar with California politics. Your assessment of absolute control by the Democrats is simply not true.

Finally Democrats took the place of many Republicans in this recent election, and we can now progress on a Democratic agenda without Republican obstructionism. The day I switch parties will be the day Republicans start caring about the masses as much as they do about the wealthy. In other words, probably never.


Bmac wrote:
Richard94611 wrote:
There is a new difference between what you cite and the actuality. For the first time in decades, the legislature is totally controlled by the Democrats, so progress will not be blocked any more by the Republicans. So your statements that Democrats have "run" California for years is quite wrong. NOW we Democrats run it.


Well Richard, hate to break this to you, but the California State Senate has been in Democrat hands since 1970. Hmm, that's 42 years!

The California State Assembly has been Democratic, except for one year, also since 1970. That's 41 out of 42 years since 1970.

In my world, that equates to the Democratic Party having overwhelming control of the purse strings in California for a very long time.

Perhaps you haven't lived there very long and were unaware of the states politics. Now that you know maybe you should consider switching parties. 8-)
quote=Richard94611 There is a new difference betw... (show quote)
You are absolutely wrong about this. There has be... (show quote)


Wow....Richard! You sound very dictatorial! I prefer checks and balances...one party "rule" is scary....as for BMAC...good job with quoting sources as Richard asked you to do....it appears that he only quotes opinions with no source backup....interesting....but not surprising. Angry man, that Richard....

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 10:10:34   #
Richard94611 Loc: Oakland, CA
 
Bmac wrote:
Richard94611 wrote:
You are absolutely wrong about this. There has been a block by Republicans in the California legislature for a number of years. Time and time again the Republicans have prevented progressive legislation that the Democrats wanted. May I remind you that some types of legislation require a 2/3 (or is it just 60% ? I forget which.) majority. This is what the Republicans have voted against and prevented from being put into law. Perhaps you are just unfamiliar with California politics. Your assessment of absolute control by the Democrats is simply not true.
You are absolutely wrong about this. There has be... (show quote)


The California Legislature, both the Senate and the Assembly, have been in Democratic hands 41 out of the last 42 years since 1970. That isn't opinion, those are the facts.

[Yes, and I have explained that the devil is in the details. For a great many bills regarding the spending or raising of money -- such as increasing or imposing taxes --, a super-majority has been necessary, and the Republicans have prevented this from being achieved for many progressive bills. That isn't opinion, that is fact.]

My opinion is that if those Democrats could not pass their "progressive" legislation due to the minority party in both houses of the legislature for 41 out of 42 years than the California Democratic Party is a farce.

[Fortunately that is just your opinion, and it does not take into account certain facts regarding the need either for a super majority or cooperation from Republicans to pass certain kinds of bills, including the need to tax in order to fund certain things.]

In actuality, California has enacted progressive Democratic legislation for years which has bankrupted the state. [And here we have the real problem with what you understand and don't understand. A lot of money-raising bills have not been passed because of the Republican opposition. This will no longer be the case, now that the Democrats have a super majority. We have now gotten rid of the Republican road block. The people of California have seen how destructive Republicans have been to this state's finances, and they have spoken. Now we can actually raise money. As you Republicans said repeatedly when W stole the election, "Get used to it."

It is ironic that you begin a thread contending that the Republican Party is "falling to pieces" yet somehow, these same Republicans can prevent the Democrats from passing their agenda. Perhaps the only way the Democrats can accomplish anything is via a dictatorship.

[I don't see the irony. In fact, I don't think there is any. In California, which in many ways is the most progressive state in the Union, we now have much more control. Things have changed. The past is not the present. Get used to it.]

8-)
quote=Richard94611 You are absolutely wrong about... (show quote)

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 10:16:04   #
Richard94611 Loc: Oakland, CA
 
Seachelle, I quoted a very interesting course, an entire book -- The New New Deal. Go read it.

If you can be fooled by BMAC's omission of facts regarding the need for a super majority to raise taxes and do certain kinds of legislation in California, then you were probably fooled by Romney, too. The American public wasn't. The gap between the number of votes Obama got in this last election and the number that Romney got keeps getting greater and greater as absentee votes are counted.

I am not at all angry, though it may seem so to you. I am elated that you Republicans have finally been trounced and that the Republican party seems to be falling apart, and that California now has the chance to raise the revenues necessary for progressive programs.

Reply
Check out Astronomical Photography Forum section of our forum.
Dec 10, 2012 10:29:31   #
john vance Loc: Granbury,Texas
 
Richard94611 wrote:
I assume that by "they" you mean the Republicans. No, they don't understand it. Their political party is falling to pieces beneath their very feet, and they still cannot understand why. You know, if you are Black and walk into a room where people don't like Blacks, you can tell this about them, no matter what they say. The same is true of Blacks in the electorate. No matter what the Republicans say, they have tipped their cards for the entire wqorld to see and know.

Mac wrote:
Richard94611 wrote:
From today's New York Times:


"Who would ever have thought blacks would get out and support the first black president? Who would ever have thought women would shy away from the party of transvaginal probes? Who would ever have thought gays would work against a party that treated them as immoral and subhuman? Who would have ever thought young people would desert a party that ignored science and hectored on social issues? Who would ever have thought Latinos would scorn a party that expected them to finish up their chores and self-deport?"
From today's New York Times: br br br "Who ... (show quote)


They still don't understand.
quote=Richard94611 From today's New York Times: b... (show quote)
I assume that by "they" you mean the Rep... (show quote)


Now that is funny.!!! dem's voted against freeing slaves and faught Civel war over it, they lost then formed KKK, yes indeed Dem's love Blacks. It was the Republicans who were for Blacks and freed them.

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 10:31:27   #
john vance Loc: Granbury,Texas
 
Richard94611 wrote:
Isn't that just wonderful that there are so many Republican governors ? All I care about is that we now have a TOTALLY Democratic state government, from Governor and Legislature down, and are pulling out of the economic problems Bush's policies caused. No, I take that back. I am also eager to see Obama kick ass now that he doesn't have to worry about reelection politics. Where California goes -- upwards into much better things under Brown -- the rest of the nation will soon follow, except of course for some of the really backward states like Alabama and Texas.

What has begun to amaze me is the enormous amount that Obama actually accomplished during his first three years of the presidency. Read all about it in The New New Deal. Most of the telling of this was lost in the lying static Romney and the Republicans did, but these facts are now beginning to become evident.

Get used to Obama, because he is here for another 4 years plus, and now he will really kick ass.


Bmac wrote:
Richard94611 wrote:
their political party is falling to pieces beneath their very feet,.......


The Republicans control the House of Representatives.

The Republicans presently have 30 governors compared to the Democrats 20. There are 27 Republican-controlled State Legislatures (both houses) compared to 15 Democratic-controlled Legislatures.

There are presently 22 Republican-controlled state governments, meaning control of the governor's office and both chambers of the legislature, compared to 11 for the Democrats.

Hardly a political party falling to pieces. Ironic that this poor party, in such dire straits, is used by so many as the new excuse for Obama's failed policies. So weak, and yet so powerful? Maybe it is due to Obama's weak leadership, otherwise how could such a destroyed party inhibit him? 8-)
quote=Richard94611 their political party is falli... (show quote)
Isn't that just wonderful that there are so many R... (show quote)


communist are you ? sure sound like it.!!!!

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 10:34:05   #
Schwabbie28 Loc: Crested Butte, Colorado
 
Our state "enjoys" the reign of one Bobby Jindal, Governor.
He has cut LSU's budget by $300 million over 3 years, leading to loss of President, Chancellor (who departed for Colorado State), and MANY professors and department heads. His recent legislation to permit public payments for private school students was declared unconstitutional by a Republican judge. He blocked a Federal grant of $80 million to supply internet service to rural areas which do not have it, stating simply that private businesses might want to provide such service in the future. When two legislators failed to support his plan to privatize the state employees' retirement system, he fied them from the operative committee and replaced them with his right-wing soul-mates. Welcome to Republican "governance".

Reply
Dec 10, 2012 10:34:57   #
Greg Steffen
 
The main reason The GOP lost is a lack of paying attention to the power of the corrupt left leaning media. A decent human would not repeat the drivel from NYT. But you are from Oakland the home of liberals, homos and pot heads. Did I mention anti-American poeple that would just as soon America be transformed into Euro trash. I am sure you voted for the village idiot Barak. Unfortunately you will be dead by the time Obama's damage is manifest in this great country.
Richard94611 wrote:
From today's New York Times:


"Who would ever have thought blacks would get out and support the first black president? Who would ever have thought women would shy away from the party of transvaginal probes? Who would ever have thought gays would work against a party that treated them as immoral and subhuman? Who would have ever thought young people would desert a party that ignored science and hectored on social issues? Who would ever have thought Latinos would scorn a party that expected them to finish up their chores and self-deport?"
From today's New York Times: br br br "Who ... (show quote)

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 19 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Check out Photo Critique Section section of our forum.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.