Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Film caused me to plan
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
Apr 3, 2023 14:28:01   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
The active whining thread can be found at: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-769788-1.html


I already unwatched that thread.

Reply
Apr 3, 2023 14:29:55   #
SuperflyTNT Loc: Manassas VA
 
gvarner wrote:
When I used film I had to plan ahead. I was limited in money and couldn’t waste shots. No pictures of my dinner. No pictures taken "just because I could". I had to plan ahead and work at it. Film was a limited resource. Digital tends to make me lazy about planning ahead. Your thoughts.


That’s one way to look at it. The flip side is that digital allows freedom to take more chances and experiment. It opens doors to more creativity.

Reply
Apr 3, 2023 14:46:28   #
kb6kgx Loc: Simi Valley, CA
 
JohnSwanda wrote:
I don't think Brady and his associates were out photographing during actual combat, like today's photojournalists do. They were mostly set up shots and the aftermath of battles. Some dead bodies, but not dodging bullets.


No, they weren't, but I was responding to the comment about becoming a famous photographer "with bullets whizzing by" or some such thing.

Reply
 
 
Apr 3, 2023 14:54:01   #
BBurns Loc: South Bay, California
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
The active whining thread can be found at: https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-769788-1.html

Reply
Apr 3, 2023 16:44:30   #
rdalex
 
gvarner wrote:
When I used film I had to plan ahead. I was limited in money and couldn’t waste shots. No pictures of my dinner. No pictures taken "just because I could". I had to plan ahead and work at it. Film was a limited resource. Digital tends to make me lazy about planning ahead. Your thoughts.


Drives my wife nuts, but I still take limited pictures. Don't want to look back at a bunch of stuff I can't remember why I took.

I enjoy digital more because when I feel like it I can "practice" with multiple different sets of exposures of the same scene, etc. with no guilt about wasting film. I still come home from vacations with far fewer shots than my friends, but I'm happy with what I've got and not overwhelmed (of course, there is a delete button on my computer.....)

Reply
Apr 3, 2023 17:32:31   #
jaymatt Loc: Alexandria, Indiana
 
gvarner wrote:
When I used film I had to plan ahead. I was limited in money and couldn’t waste shots. No pictures of my dinner. No pictures taken "just because I could". I had to plan ahead and work at it. Film was a limited resource. Digital tends to make me lazy about planning ahead. Your thoughts.


Didn’t we all?

Reply
Apr 3, 2023 20:49:53   #
Milkiebear
 
I still plan everything, and o ly shoot what intend to. Since I am not a fan of going through a hundreds of photos. Then having to edit is a lot of time.

Reply
 
 
Apr 3, 2023 22:04:21   #
Boris77
 
gvarner wrote:
When I used film I had to plan ahead. I was limited in money and couldn’t waste shots. No pictures of my dinner. No pictures taken "just because I could". I had to plan ahead and work at it. Film was a limited resource. Digital tends to make me lazy about planning ahead. Your thoughts.


Digital is FUN! when you are retired.
I could no longer shoot film because of all the material used/wasted. Film is TOO anti-environmental.
Boris

Reply
Apr 4, 2023 00:46:48   #
RodeoMan Loc: St Joseph, Missouri
 
Blenheim Orange wrote:
Civil War photographer Mathew B. Brady and his assistants shot 10,000+ photographs during the war. He worked with heavy glass plates coated with the flammable liquid collodion, which then had to be put into into a bath of silver nitrate. That created a photosensitive silver iodide on the plate. Exposure - and processing! - had to take place before the plate dried, in minutes. Most of the work was done in the field, in all kinds of weather and sometimes with shells and bullets whizzing past. Brady and his helpers photographed anything and everything related to the war, the idea being that it was impossible to know what would be seen as significant and valuable to people in the future. He felt compelled to document as much as he possibly could.

He took lots of "snapshots" of relatively mundane scenes, but just about all of them are valuable today.

It is estimated that Brady spent the modern equivalent of well over a million dollars on the project, going deeply into debt. He thought that surely the investment would pay off. But after the war people wanted to forget the horrific scenes and Brady's business collapsed and he died in a poor house, penniless and still deeply in debt.

Mathew Brady Civil War Photographs

Camp scene by The U.S. National Archives, on Flickr
Civil War photographer Mathew B. Brady and his ass... (show quote)


Thank you what may be the mundane of today may become the historic artifact of tomorrow illuminating some aspect today's today's life for people in the future.

Reply
Apr 4, 2023 01:18:23   #
Blenheim Orange Loc: Michigan
 
RodeoMan wrote:
Thank you what may be the mundane of today may become the historic artifact of tomorrow illuminating some aspect today's today's life for people in the future.


Exactly.

Reply
Apr 4, 2023 08:45:06   #
revhen Loc: By the beautiful Hudson
 
Yep. Particularly with Kodachrome. With processing so expensive but so beautiful. Now it's so easy to shoot, shoot, shoot. The infinite monkey theory: Take enough and a wonderful one will inevitably appear. "It ain't necessarily so."

Reply
 
 
Apr 4, 2023 10:44:49   #
bsprague Loc: Lacey, WA, USA
 
revhen wrote:
Yep. Particularly with Kodachrome. With processing so expensive but so beautiful. Now it's so easy to shoot, shoot, shoot. The infinite monkey theory: Take enough and a wonderful one will inevitably appear. "It ain't necessarily so."


My memory of Kodachrome projected on a screen was good. But, I think today's slide shows on the better and larger 4K TV screens is much better.

Reply
Apr 4, 2023 10:49:17   #
Picture Taker Loc: Michigan Thumb
 
The projected slides were good for the time but, todays projectors and pixels of today's digital have the improve penology have surpassed then.

Reply
Apr 4, 2023 11:17:06   #
MaryFran Loc: Front Royal, VA
 
agillot wrote:
On the other hand , digital make you better , because of trial and error .You see the mistakes on the spot and can correct .You cant do that with film .Also, a modern camera take the picture for you , except if you shoot in 100 % manual mode .


We have a son who follows everything the other people in the family do. When everyone bought film cameras, he bought one too. His photos were HORRIBLE. He would take pictures of a single person and that person was so tiny in the entire frame that it was hard to tell who it was. When everyone bought digital, he spoke of buying one too. I discouraged him as much as I could, telling him his film pictures were awful. He disregarded what I said and bought one anyway. Immediately he could see what he was doing and began photographing differently. Now, his pictures are worth looking at. A dramatic change because of the change in medium. And, he mostly does manual.

Reply
Apr 4, 2023 11:19:24   #
JohnSwanda Loc: San Francisco
 
Picture Taker wrote:
The projected slides were good for the time but, todays projectors and pixels of today's digital have the improve penology have surpassed then.


Penology is the study of the punishment of crime. I just can't figure out what word you meant to use.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 5 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.