Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
No urge to upgrade to Fuji X-T5 - 40mp?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Nov 5, 2022 06:25:27   #
yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey
 
Back in the day I had no problems enlarging a well exposed D70 6MP image to 20x30 for my brother-in-law.

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 07:12:23   #
oldschoolshooter Loc: Mountain View, HI
 
I still shoot some sports and action and I will be buying the X-T5 for the improved autofocus. Birders that shoot Fujifilm might upgrade for the same reason.

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 07:19:45   #
Architect1776 Loc: In my mind
 
dpullum wrote:
In the beginning of the great pixel race it was pointed out that the smaller the individual pixels get the smear/bloom from one to the next gets greater.
https://www.adimec.com/ccd-versus-cmos-blooming-and-smear-performance/
https://www.blurbiness.com/web/en/blog/megapixel-myth-more-megapixels-does-not-mean-better-quality-photos

Beyond MP increase there are other improvements which may be an advantage if needed:
https://www.photographyblog.com/articles/fujifilm_x_t5_vs_x_t4_head_to_head_comparison

Ignoring these comments... we print or project or TV display our photos. If printed, the printers are just so so good and may not display the MP difference... if they do can our eye perceive the difference. Old study on super audio cables, electronically no difference, audio no difference... unless the group was told that A is good cable and B is a super cable costing 10x the price. On a TV, the T-3,4, and 5 images are limited by the TV.

Consider the MP race is not needed and an old Fuji with 3 MP may be fine. If taken at high shutter speed then all the stabilizer features are not needed, even dynamic range differences can be software compensated.
In a recent study I did images from my historically wonderful, expensive, Kodak DC4800 3.1 MP were cleaned, sharpened, and MP enhanced by the Topaz AI Trio, De-noise AI, Sharpen AI, and Gigapixel AI. Once the magic has been performed, a huge photo print of quality is possible from a humble 3 MP beginning!!
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-753293-1.html
In the beginning of the great pixel race it was po... (show quote)



Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2022 07:59:23   #
Rab-Eye Loc: Indiana
 
ejrmaine wrote:
Well, I'm upgrading my X-T3 and buying the X-T5, but not for the 40MP. Rather, for the AI focus and the extended battery life. To each his own.


πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»πŸ‘πŸ»

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 08:21:07   #
AndyT Loc: Hampstead, New Hampshire
 
yssirk123 wrote:
Back in the day I had no problems enlarging a well exposed D70 6MP image to 20x30 for my brother-in-law.


The old D70. I had one of those.

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 09:26:19   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
As a corollary to your post, I have no desire to purchase/upgrade any of my photography equipment. I have quite enough and it all works rather well.
--Bob
Dragonophile wrote:
I enjoy my X-T3 and X-T4 but the newest version - the X-T5 - holds little appeal to me at this point. I don't think I need or want a 40mp sensor. Now, I understand many people might find that highly desirable. So be it. But I take many pictures and the extra storage costs do not seem worth it to me. And I see no reason to buy it and lower the pixel count.

What am I missing? I get that more pixels can equal superior IQ but I will be interested in reading reviews to see how people rate IQ between the T4 and T5. If the difference in IQ is noticeable to the eye on standard prints, I might change my mind. But if it is only noticeable if I were printing posters or billboards, then no thanks.
I enjoy my X-T3 and X-T4 but the newest version - ... (show quote)

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 09:32:34   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
If you see these terms, buy!

New
Improved
Bigger
Better
More


Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2022 10:07:29   #
sippyjug104 Loc: Missouri
 
I have a habit of buying a new drill each time one comes to market, however, I always end up drilling the same type of holes over and over.

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 10:18:57   #
alexol
 
I have an XT-5 on order, not as an upgrade but because I want a mirrorless interchangeable lens camera - don't have one at the moment - and I'd like it to be another Fuji.

No point in buying an XT-4 as it (so far) doesn't seem that there will be enough price difference to make it worthwhile, and why buy old tech when new is available. Plus, the XT-5 seems to have some substantial advantages:

- I don't need a huge pixel count but do like to crop heavily sometimes to accommodate the lack of a fleet of lenses.

- auto focus seems much improved, both in terms of speed and picking up eyes.

- no idea what I'll do with 1/180,000 electronic shutter speed but it might be fun to play with.

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 10:37:56   #
lwerthe1mer Loc: Birmingham, Alabama
 
GAS is usually unproductive, except for the camera companies. Most of the features on modern camera, in my opinion, just make photography more complicated than it needs to be.

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 10:45:49   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
lwerthe1mer wrote:
GAS is usually unproductive, except for the camera companies. Most of the features on modern camera, in my opinion, just make photography more complicated than it needs to be.



Reply
 
 
Nov 5, 2022 10:55:50   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
sippyjug104 wrote:
I have a habit of buying a new drill each time one comes to market, however, I always end up drilling the same type of holes over and over.


One advantage of having many drills is being able to find one when you want one.

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 11:05:55   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
jerryc41 wrote:
One advantage of having many drills is being able to find one when you want one.


And you don’t have to ask, β€œWhich drill should I use?”

Reply
Nov 5, 2022 11:17:11   #
Fredrick Loc: Former NYC, now San Francisco Bay Area
 
RonDavis wrote:
Right, I'm still enjoying my X-T2....and loving it!



Reply
Nov 5, 2022 11:38:14   #
xt2 Loc: British Columbia, Canada
 
dpullum wrote:
In the beginning of the great pixel race it was pointed out that the smaller the individual pixels get the smear/bloom from one to the next gets greater.
https://www.adimec.com/ccd-versus-cmos-blooming-and-smear-performance/
https://www.blurbiness.com/web/en/blog/megapixel-myth-more-megapixels-does-not-mean-better-quality-photos

Beyond MP increase there are other improvements which may be an advantage if needed:
https://www.photographyblog.com/articles/fujifilm_x_t5_vs_x_t4_head_to_head_comparison

Ignoring these comments... we print or project or TV display our photos. If printed, the printers are just so so good and may not display the MP difference... if they do can our eye perceive the difference. Old study on super audio cables, electronically no difference, audio no difference... unless the group was told that A is good cable and B is a super cable costing 10x the price. On a TV, the T-3,4, and 5 images are limited by the TV.

Consider the MP race is not needed and an old Fuji with 3 MP may be fine. If taken at high shutter speed then all the stabilizer features are not needed, even dynamic range differences can be software compensated.
In a recent study I did images from my historically wonderful, expensive, Kodak DC4800 3.1 MP were cleaned, sharpened, and MP enhanced by the Topaz AI Trio, De-noise AI, Sharpen AI, and Gigapixel AI. Once the magic has been performed, a huge photo print of quality is possible from a humble 3 MP beginning!!
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-753293-1.html
In the beginning of the great pixel race it was po... (show quote)


Interesting...I guess we really do not need 10% of all the camera hype from the big manufacturers after all...

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.