PhotogHobbyist wrote:
Comparison of driving a car and taking photos sounds like it would be like apples to oranges, but it may be more realistic than meets the eye.
Learning to do anythig manually takes concentration and practice to master all the functions of the process. To learn an automated process is extremely simple as the mechanism performs many of the processes. An example in my mind is, learning to drive a car with a manual transmission then switching to automatic is very easy to do. The other direction as described by you is more difficult. Learning a manual process, in reality, is learning how to do both, manual and automatic. That results in the learner to have the opportunity to make a choice more easily.
Comparison of driving a car and taking photos soun... (
show quote)
Piggybacking on your car analogy I feel it is very similar. Case in point - when I was 18 and behind the wheel of a '65 Mustang 289 4-speed I learned how to feel the road w/ gear changing, braking, accelerating, etc. One night in Nashville a buddy-' 73 Vega !!, yeah I know.... - were off to the side of a side road in the evening. A fellow high school student w/ brand new '74 Trans Am slowed down and gave us both the finger. "T" looked at me and pointed down the road. Climbing on the TA at around 80, intersection to the main road coming up, light red. His braking gave me the opportunity to close the gap and with the light now green he accelerated. Problem was his nose was all over the place at the speed he was going and the back was following. He obviously didn't have a clue as to what he was doing, or the capabilities of this fantastic car. The 289 was screaming through rpm's downshifting and I thought he's going to kill us both. Yet knowing how my car handled I put the 'Stang' into an intentional powerslide
downshifting to rev and hit the power band, control the steering and doing what is now called a "Swedish slide" and with tires burning and engine screaming, w/intentional control of the steering I slid around him at probably no more than 65 mph. Eased grip of the wheel, let it right itself after! braking 'till the apex of the turn and nailed it, pulling out of the slide and again asking more of the engine that it was usually asked. Passed him on the uphill side and caught just a bit of air on the downside. He wouldn't come up to me at the light at McDonald's. sheesh what a wuss. Was just having fun............Point is, his TA could outperform that Mustang in all performance categories,except one: knowing your equipment and knowing how and when to use it. Not training, just experience. Well, training right after the times you needed said experience...........
ps I now wonder why I never thought about the cops....well, they Were involved at some other time(s)......... youth, ignorance, guts, and wondering how far one can push things - except Dad and, well, the cops......
Kind of like my first Pentax K-1000. Basic settings. "sorry no pictures, no neg's on the strip" to develop on the package(s). sheeesh And figuring out what I did wrong.
Push processing of film. Learning to intentionally under/ over expose a particular brand of film; Kodak, Agafa, Ilford, etc. Lots of money on b&w contact sheets & prints. Notes on what I did - mostly so I wouldn't 'did it' again.
Learning the limits in steering your equipment to get the most of the camera.
Knowing the basics and then elevating your game is part of the joy of photography. And then you can ask of it to produce what you 'see' and then of what the camera is capable.
And yet again, if one just wants to push a button ( pro's excluded here) then they can be happy w/ mediocre performance, compared to what their equipment may be able to offer.