Which Camera Brand in 21st Century
It is true to say that CAMERAS never take photos, but YOU do. However; YOU must have a camera to do your job.
We used to have over dozens of camera brands in last century (over 30 years ago), but today my choice is 4 or 5?
I would like to know how today's photographers favor which brand is the best. We must consider all those factors; what is capability of the equipment and system, pricing, reliability, service availability, and user friendly design.
I came up with four major names; SONY, FUJI. CANON, and NIKON. There were OLYMPUS, PENTAX, LEICA and PANASONIC a decade ago, what happened with them, are they still with us?
The 4 you name are still in business and doing quite well.
Ho Boy, this should generate at least a half dozen pages of responses. Let me "start the bidding" with Canon.
I would say that all current cameras are about equal in what they can do and produce. I think it's whatever you're used to and what you have bought in to.
When you first get into photography, that's when you must decide on a brand after that, it gets expensive.
I think Leica is still holding it's own- you have the Q series and the SL's that are somewhat affordable.
huemax wrote:
It is true to say that CAMERAS never take photos, but YOU do. However; YOU must have a camera to do your job.
We used to have over dozens of camera brands in last century (over 30 years ago), but today my choice is 4 or 5?
I would like to know how today's photographers favor which brand is the best. We must consider all those factors; what is capability of the equipment and system, pricing, reliability, service availability, and user friendly design.
I came up with four major names; SONY, FUJI. CANON, and NIKON. There were OLYMPUS, PENTAX, LEICA and PANASONIC a decade ago, what happened with them, are they still with us?
It is true to say that CAMERAS never take photos, ... (
show quote)
I don't know what drives others in the decision making process, but for me it really comes down to, price, (value for money), capabilities, (features /functions), available accessories, (lenses etc), future proofing, (software/firmware updates), and customer service. Ease of use is a big concideration for me, so I tend to stay with what I've become comfortable with, (Canon in my case), because most of the buttons and controls are easy for me to find across the range, but I'm sure that applies to all makers. So that's just my 2 cents worth, and I guess that is just my opinion on "the big 4 or so!
All the best, and have a great 4th!
Ray.
Yes, there will be camera brands in the 21st Century.
Just like there will be car, TV, cell phone, computer, mower, ear bud, ... brands.
I suppose, for some reason, it matters.
I've always liked Canon, thought it was the best in terms of $ , quality, usability and system, hated the handling of the Nikon Products at that time, did own and like other brands and film sizes from Minolta 16's up to Crown Graphic 4x5.
Mac
Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
huemax wrote:
It is true to say that CAMERAS never take photos, but YOU do. However; YOU must have a camera to do your job.
We used to have over dozens of camera brands in last century (over 30 years ago), but today my choice is 4 or 5?
I would like to know how today's photographers favor which brand is the best. We must consider all those factors; what is capability of the equipment and system, pricing, reliability, service availability, and user friendly design.
I came up with four major names; SONY, FUJI. CANON, and NIKON. There were OLYMPUS, PENTAX, LEICA and PANASONIC a decade ago, what happened with them, are they still with us?
It is true to say that CAMERAS never take photos, ... (
show quote)
My first digital camera was a Nikon D90 and I have stayed with Nikon because of lens comparability and menu familiarity,
Olympus, Pentax, Leica and Panasonic are still around.
Here is a list of digital camera brands:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_digital_camera_brands
I got in digital cameras with a combination of Nikon camera on the top of a Kodak pack, some time ago early 1980s, since then I have had several Canon cameras some professional and some none, the one I have now is M50 Canon because is compact and easy to carry around for my age. I have stocked with the Canon brand because I find their cameras are very easy to read and work with their functionality, and I have never had any problems with them.
There is no overall best, but at any given instant in time one camera body might be more advanced for a particular genre of photography than the competition, then it won't be too long before some one else comes up with something better. Do your research to avoid buyers remorse. Buy what's right for you at the time you are ready to purchase, then go out and take great photos. I believe that 75% of making great images is your skill at the art and science of photography and a little luck, 15% post processing, and 10% gear, as long as that gear meets a minimum quality standard. Unfortunately, most of us spend 80% of our time worrying about our gear instead of what's important to taking great photos.
For me most brands and recent cameras seem to compete with relative equity for 95% of photographic subjects and situations, regardless of brand. As you approach the limits in any direction then some cameras gain an advantage over the rest. For example, if you want/need ultra-high resolution then only a few offer it (Fuji GFS, Sony a7Riv, etc.). If you want really fast frame rates with great autofocus then again you are relegated to a few bodies from limited manufacturers. There are other specialties which bring out specific bodies as well.
Strodav wrote:
There is no overall best, but at any given instant in time one camera body might be more advanced for a particular genre of photography than the competition, then it won't be too long before some one else comes up with something better. Do your research to avoid buyers remorse. Buy what's right for you at the time you are ready to purchase, then go out and take great photos. I believe that 75% of making great images is your skill at the art and science of photography and a little luck, 15% post processing, and 10% gear, as long as that gear meets a minimum quality standard. Unfortunately, most of us spend 80% of our time worrying about our gear instead of what's important to taking great photos.
There is no overall best, but at any given instant... (
show quote)
As gwilliams6 had pointed out here, most if not all of the major photojournalism and news agencies in the US and abroad have migrated to using Sony gear, so that says something about the brand.
MDI Mainer wrote:
As gwilliams6 had pointed out here, most if not all of the major photojournalism and news agencies in the US and abroad have migrated to using Sony gear, so that says something about the brand.
What Sony's marketing department might have done (yes, I'm speculating) is to offer fantastic discounts and service guarantees on their equipment to the major photojournalism and news agencies for advertising purposes. It's done all the time in many different industries with many different products.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.