Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
Post processing use...
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
May 23, 2022 13:07:30   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
To elaborate on a portion of your statement, "how you got from "a" to "b" is irrelevant to the person standing in front of the print."

Similarly, boasting about the camera/lens, etc. is irrelevant, as well. It's the final product/print that is important.
--Bob
MSW wrote:
wow- that's pretty dramatic ... gotta figure out how to do that ... the "object of the exercise" (as i see it) is not some sort of ideological purity, but the capture of the image and the statement you make in doing so ... how you got from "a" to "b" is irrelevant to the person standing in front of the print

Reply
May 23, 2022 13:20:24   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
It took me a long time on UHH to decide other people's willful ignorance is not worth any effort on my part to attempt to educate.....


It might help if you can remind yourself that such people have a tendency to voice opinions by stating them as facts. Once you correctly identify such assertions as opinions it then becomes a simple process of you stating a contrary opinion (as an opinion) and then defending it if necessary. It's then up to the other person to decide if they're going to acknowledge the truth of what you're saying. If they don't, it's their loss and you don't have to feel like you've failed in your attempt to educate them.

It's also worth remembering that hearing a contrary opinion may remind the other person indirectly that their asserted "fact" is also just an opinion. Attacking their assertion is most likely to produce a defensive reaction in the other person which they will often turn into an attack of their own.

Reply
May 23, 2022 13:25:29   #
JRiepe Loc: Southern Illinois
 
From my D7000's, D7200 and D500 I post process 100% of my images but if I had the Z9 I would probably post process only 100%.😁

Reply
 
 
May 23, 2022 13:29:30   #
User ID
 
DAN Phillips wrote:
I agree with 100%!

Also agreeing ... but also keeping in mind that "You cannot cure stoopid".

That kept in mind, I try to appreciate the entertainment value of the situation.

Reply
May 23, 2022 13:38:08   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
A good photograph has the most pixels.
A good photographer has a mirrorless camera.
A great photographer masters PhotoShop.

Reply
May 23, 2022 13:55:56   #
Linda From Maine Loc: Yakima, Washington
 
R.G. wrote:
It might help if you can remind yourself that such people have a tendency to voice opinions by stating them as facts...
Yep, that part I figured out years ago - one of the favorite constructs of the most famous bad boy you and I have known on UHH

R.G. wrote:
... It's then up to the other person to decide if they're going to acknowledge the truth of what you're saying. If they don't, it's their loss and you don't have to feel like you've failed in your attempt to educate them...
In my opinion, willful ignorance isn't worth the energy to attempt education. I said it took me a long time to learn that, but the important thing is I've known it for a couple of years now. The rest is bygones

Reply
May 23, 2022 14:48:57   #
User ID
 
Rongnongno wrote:
Actually, I am quite busy shooting stacked close-ups of orchids. This thread came about because I was answering someone earlier and checked his profile history first.

His original post ticked me off, then his history showed way too much ignorance on what PP is about. Instead of revving his older thread, I created a new one, concerning all.

Venting if you prefer.

Funny how you are on 'grand scale' and I am into smaller things...


I often check someones profile/history.
Boils down to "consider the source".

Reply
 
 
May 23, 2022 14:59:05   #
R.G. Loc: Scotland
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
.....one of the favorite constructs of the most famous bad boy you and I have known on UHH


Ah yes, such fond memories..... .

PS - I know that you know, but sometimes we need reminding. Full-blown manifestations of opinionism (don't bother googling it - I just invented it) can have that effect on us.

Reply
May 24, 2022 07:11:51   #
nimbushopper Loc: Tampa, FL
 
Wow, I really love that last image!

Reply
May 24, 2022 07:34:09   #
skipwv Loc: West Virginia
 
Linda From Maine wrote:
An awful lot of energy on this site goes into trying to convert the unwilling. Why? There should be enough folks here to be able to gather into like-minded groups in order to learn, enjoy, admire, and be inspired by what they like most about photography.


Well said, and to the point!

Reply
May 24, 2022 07:38:39   #
Jimmy T Loc: Virginia
 
Rongnongno wrote:
I am getting a bit tired of folks stating that "PP is for those who cannot shoot". SOOC is all I need.

This shows either a complete misunderstanding of what PP is about or a rejection due to not being able to use PP correctly. (We see the same type of comment about using flashes, among other things.)

I have posted an example of what a decent PP does to an image.

Note:
This is a stacked image (another form of PP, but this not what I am arguing about in this thread).
I am getting a bit tired of folks stating that &qu... (show quote)


The responses for the first two pages (so far) to this thread give me hope for UHH.
I have and hope to continue learning from you fine folks who do not confuse their opinions with facts.
You same folks patiently share your hard-earned knowledge, instruct the uninitiated, and provide examples and references to make your points.
It is so good to see some of my most admired UHH contributors voice their observations regarding this issue.
Best Wishes,
JimmyT Sends
Bravo Zulu

PS: No worries, because the folks that cause your concern will not recognise that they are the targets of this discussion.

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2022 08:15:22   #
Retina Loc: Near Charleston,SC
 
Rongnongno wrote:
I am getting a bit tired of folks stating that "PP is for those who cannot shoot". SOOC is all I need.

This shows either a complete misunderstanding of what PP is about or a rejection due to not being able to use PP correctly. (We see the same type of comment about using flashes, among other things.)

I have posted an example of what a decent PP does to an image.

Note:
This is a stacked image (another form of PP, but this not what I am arguing about in this thread).
I am getting a bit tired of folks stating that &qu... (show quote)

People spend time (and money) on what they want to get better at, whether they love the process or maybe have certain goals. SOOC meets the needs of those with more modest expectations. There is nothing wrong with that. Others are not happy with SOOC but accept the compromises because they don't have the time for PP. I bet there are some here who work unrelated day jobs and can't wait to practice post when they retire. I doubt there are many who tried, gave up, and rationalize away post as necessary only for those who lack advanced SOOC skills. To any experts here get satisfaction from helping others see the advantages of making the most of what a sensor can do, comparisons between a best-effort SOOC vs a good post version of the same exposure help to illustrate the differences.

Reply
May 24, 2022 08:18:19   #
jerryc41 Loc: Catskill Mts of NY
 
When I was a kid, I never processed. But then, I grew up. Processing is a big part of the enjoyment of photography.

Reply
May 24, 2022 08:19:19   #
nikonbrain Loc: Crystal River Florida
 
Rongnongno wrote:
I am getting a bit tired of folks stating that "PP is for those who cannot shoot". SOOC is all I need.

This shows either a complete misunderstanding of what PP is about or a rejection due to not being able to use PP correctly. (We see the same type of comment about using flashes, among other things.)

I have posted an example of what a decent PP does to an image.

Note:
This is a stacked image (another form of PP, but this not what I am arguing about in this thread).
I am getting a bit tired of folks stating that &qu... (show quote)
Amen !!!! Example One image before ACR second in progress Just out of ACR using My camera Profile .Image still needs a ton of work as it part of a panorama to be stitched There is a lot of dust on sensor in the sky that needs to be edited out .


(Download)


(Download)

Reply
May 24, 2022 08:24:59   #
Jimmy T Loc: Virginia
 
jerryc41 wrote:
When I was a kid, I never processed. But then, I grew up. Processing is a big part of the enjoyment of photography.



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 11 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.