Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
I read the rules
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Jun 5, 2021 11:39:58   #
Ace Paladino
 
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regarding my use of caps and the subsequent advice that the forum rules forbid their use, I decided to read the rules. Man oh man, I think the Declaration of Independence is shorter.
(I checked, it is). Some rules seem very reasonable, some don't. The fact that one cannot reply to the page of rules seems like one of the unreasonable rules.
If I'm sitting in front of my computer, in my underwear while I'm writing this, I've probably broken at least 10 rules already.

Reply
Jun 5, 2021 11:49:25   #
Bill_de Loc: US
 
Ace Paladino wrote:
The fact that one cannot reply to the page of rules seems like one of the unreasonable rules.


Nobody wants to see debates over the rules. It would probably take more space than a raw vs jpg thread.

However, you can send a private message to Admin.

Just click on the 'private messages' button above and put Admin in the Compose new message to: box.

---

Reply
Jun 5, 2021 12:07:04   #
Doddy Loc: Barnard Castle-England
 
7 actually.

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2021 12:09:13   #
Mac Loc: Pittsburgh, Philadelphia now Hernando Co. Fl.
 
Ace Paladino wrote:
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regarding my use of caps and the subsequent advice that the forum rules forbid their use, I decided to read the rules. Man oh man, I think the Declaration of Independence is shorter.
(I checked, it is). Some rules seem very reasonable, some don't. The fact that one cannot reply to the page of rules seems like one of the unreasonable rules.
If I'm sitting in front of my computer, in my underwear while I'm writing this, I've probably broken at least 10 rules already.
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regar... (show quote)


Just think how much happier your life would have been if you had read the rules when you first became a member.

Reply
Jun 5, 2021 12:09:55   #
Graham Smith Loc: Cambridgeshire UK
 
Ace Paladino wrote:
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regarding my use of caps and the subsequent advice that the forum rules forbid their use, I decided to read the rules. Man oh man, I think the Declaration of Independence is shorter.
(I checked, it is). Some rules seem very reasonable, some don't. The fact that one cannot reply to the page of rules seems like one of the unreasonable rules.
If I'm sitting in front of my computer, in my underwear while I'm writing this, I've probably broken at least 10 rules already.
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regar... (show quote)


If you don't like the rules don't participate.

Reply
Jun 5, 2021 12:10:08   #
CHG_CANON Loc: the Windy City
 
Now you've broken the rule of topic relevance to the section posting, where this is Chit-Chat.

But, glad to see you've cooled down a bit from yesterday.

Reply
Jun 5, 2021 13:33:09   #
Ace Paladino
 
CHG_CANON wrote:
Now you've broken the rule of topic relevance to the section posting, where this is Chit-Chat.

But, glad to see you've cooled down a bit from yesterday.


Have you?

Reply
 
 
Jun 5, 2021 13:45:25   #
BebuLamar
 
Ace Paladino wrote:
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regarding my use of caps and the subsequent advice that the forum rules forbid their use, I decided to read the rules. Man oh man, I think the Declaration of Independence is shorter.
(I checked, it is). Some rules seem very reasonable, some don't. The fact that one cannot reply to the page of rules seems like one of the unreasonable rules.
If I'm sitting in front of my computer, in my underwear while I'm writing this, I've probably broken at least 10 rules already.
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regar... (show quote)


Ah hah! You learned something. The UHH forum isn't by the people and for the people. It's whatever the forum owner want. You enter his home you follow his rules. Yes and you did break the rules by posting this thread here but once again it's up to the forum owner to enforce the rule or not. So on the UHH there will be many rules you disagree with but also the rules don't applied equally to all members either.

Reply
Jun 5, 2021 13:50:49   #
robertjerl Loc: Corona, California
 
Doddy wrote:
7 actually.


But one is a capital offense.

This should have been posted to "Chit-Chat".

Reply
Jun 5, 2021 14:06:16   #
Longshadow Loc: Audubon, PA, United States
 
Graham Smith wrote:
If you don't like the rules don't participate.



Or start one's own forum and make one's own rules, or not.

You know darn well that there will always be someone will have a problem with at least one rule, no matter what the element for which the rules exist.

Reply
Jun 6, 2021 07:13:48   #
Canisdirus
 
Ace Paladino wrote:
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regarding my use of caps and the subsequent advice that the forum rules forbid their use, I decided to read the rules. Man oh man, I think the Declaration of Independence is shorter.
(I checked, it is). Some rules seem very reasonable, some don't. The fact that one cannot reply to the page of rules seems like one of the unreasonable rules.
If I'm sitting in front of my computer, in my underwear while I'm writing this, I've probably broken at least 10 rules already.
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regar... (show quote)


Yes, the caps rule is brand new to the internet... pesky rules.



Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2021 07:23:44   #
leftyD500 Loc: Ocala, Florida
 
Ace Paladino wrote:
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regarding my use of caps and the subsequent advice that the forum rules forbid their use, I decided to read the rules. Man oh man, I think the Declaration of Independence is shorter.
(I checked, it is). Some rules seem very reasonable, some don't. The fact that one cannot reply to the page of rules seems like one of the unreasonable rules.
If I'm sitting in front of my computer, in my underwear while I'm writing this, I've probably broken at least 10 rules already.
So, after receiving so many negative remarks regar... (show quote)


Personally, I think it is pure stupidity to get your panties in a bunch over people using caps when sending a post. People just need something to bitch about, and bitching about caps is just one of those stupid ways. Thus, the world we now live in! Personally, your use of caps DID NOT OFFEND ME!!!!

Reply
Jun 6, 2021 07:34:47   #
ddetloff Loc: Fair Haven, MI
 
jradose wrote:
Personally, I think it is pure stupidity to get your panties in a bunch over people using caps when sending a post. People just need something to bitch about, and bitching about caps is just one of those stupid ways. Thus, the world we now live in! Personally, your use of caps DID NOT OFFEND ME!!!!



Reply
Jun 6, 2021 07:45:52   #
sumo Loc: Houston suburb
 
jradose wrote:
Personally, I think it is pure stupidity to get your panties in a bunch over people using caps when sending a post. People just need something to bitch about, and bitching about caps is just one of those stupid ways. Thus, the world we now live in! Personally, your use of caps DID NOT OFFEND ME!!!!


Concur 110%

Reply
Jun 6, 2021 07:48:28   #
Canisdirus
 
jradose wrote:
Personally, I think it is pure stupidity to get your panties in a bunch over people using caps when sending a post. People just need something to bitch about, and bitching about caps is just one of those stupid ways. Thus, the world we now live in! Personally, your use of caps DID NOT OFFEND ME!!!!


No one got upset...

But notice how composition works by your own example.
Your words are sufficient to get your message across.
You did use some all caps for EMPHASIS...which is the logical way to communicate non verbally.
All caps are the visual 'raising your voice' when writing.

So all caps...is yelling.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
General Chit-Chat (non-photography talk)
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.