More catching up.
Retired CPO, thank you very much. Yes, there were outdoor recreations—hunting and fishing were both very popular there. Gen. LeMay used to come to Eagle River (nearby) for fishing. He always had a communications team and they connected to their headquarters through our comm links. I went on a hunting trip with some of the other officers—I didn’t hunt, but enjoyed the outing with them. I do have photos of that trip but didn’t post them. If you want to see them, they are in this Album:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/8712554@N02/albums/72157632285171714/page2.
Hi, jederick! Thanks for coming. You’re welcome. Yes, I’ve changed a lot since 1965.
Don, you and I were not too far apart in the early 1960s—I was stationed at Mt. Hebo AFS, Oregon up the coast from 1960 to 1962, and then at Adair AFS, Oregon at Corvallis 1962-1964. From there I was sent to Cartwright. We had Philco Tech Reps at Mt. Hebo. Thank you for your service. (I did 20 in USAF.)
twowindsbear, I did not operate a SAGE console. We were a manual site at Cartwright and SAGE was not connected to us. Prior to my assignment at Cartwright I had been at Adair AFS, Oregon, which was a SAGE Direction Center. I was a Computer Maintenance Officer there, and the SAGE consoles were my responsibility, along with all the rest of the AN/FSQ-7 equipment.
Hi, compilot. Thanks for your service.
Earnest, thanks so much. I’m glad you liked it.
Hueg2015, thanks for your interesting comment. OTC West Coast based in Maine? I knew of the installation in California. You’re welcome—I’m glad you liked it.
BurghByrd, you’re welcome. I like sharing, and am happy you enjoyed it.
Hi, twowindsbear, answering your question. I am not familiar with what the current ATC system is capable of, but some of its functions would be the same as in SAGE. SAGE was designed and operated as a defense resource, with the capability of intercepting and shooting down enemy aircraft—keeping track of air traffic was just a collateral function, and its information on that was shared with FAA. My understanding is that FAA tracking relies almost entirely on transponder information—“skin painting” is not very much done; SAGE relied heavily on actual radar returns (“skin painting”) and used transponders mostly for identification.