Noise . . . almost perfect except
Oct 18, 2020 10:43:43 #
Oct 18, 2020 14:50:40 #
Here's one more take on it after using Denoise AI and Sharpen AI.
Oct 18, 2020 15:35:29 #
Oct 18, 2020 15:50:58 #
LEWHITE7747 wrote:
For some reason Light Room did the best?
I do like the one from lightroom but it did affect the coloring of the sparrow more.
Oct 18, 2020 16:22:44 #
Oct 18, 2020 21:17:32 #
R.G. wrote:
If holding on to sharpness for the birds is a priority the best answer is to select the background and work on it separately.
Oct 19, 2020 07:49:42 #
I just added a 30 day trial of topaz de noise time to Capture[ impor. Denoise has a very good rep, I shoot high iso wide open , with minimal flash so I want to try. It seems we can add a main program and then add plugins if the program is weak in some areas. For example capture [ co,or management is excellent, I would not do major changes but I might tweet with some of Fuji’s add on. Helicon Focus stacker is specialized and I use it occasionally;;y. Yo me the joy of a La caerte vs price prixe is why I moved From Adobe To my customized needs.
Oct 19, 2020 08:37:14 #
Oct 19, 2020 09:01:44 #
Not about money about best image quality. Learn before you quote badly:) action without knowledge is fruitless
Oct 19, 2020 09:07:46 #
Xpatch wrote:
Not about money about best image quality. Learn before you quote badly:) action without knowledge is fruitless
What is your post processing insight? To help
Oct 19, 2020 09:53:10 #
Xpatch wrote:
Not about money about best image quality. Learn before you quote badly:) action without knowledge is fruitless
I was just trying to make a joke. Obviously backfired, so I apologize for offending.
Oct 19, 2020 10:37:11 #
Oct 19, 2020 16:09:34 #
I'm with the leave it alone crowd. Unless you view the picture in download and blow it up with the magnify tool you don't see the grain. Most of the attempts to de-noise change the look of the feathers in the sparrow and make it look like a watercolor. I say leave the small amount of grain/noise in it. No one but another photographer is even going to notice it.
Oct 19, 2020 17:41:21 #
flyboy61
Loc: The Great American Desert
rmalarz wrote:
OK, you have a very good photograph and captured some excellent action. Why focus the discussion on noise?
In film we have grain. The faster the film, the more apparent the grain. It's part of photography. The unfortunate aspect of digital is that the electrical engineering term 'noise' was used. There's nothing wrong with noise/grain. It's part of the image. So there is no need to "correct" it.
--Bob
In film we have grain. The faster the film, the more apparent the grain. It's part of photography. The unfortunate aspect of digital is that the electrical engineering term 'noise' was used. There's nothing wrong with noise/grain. It's part of the image. So there is no need to "correct" it.
--Bob
Correct! Noise just IS, and if the in-camera electronics won't correct it, Don't worry, be Happy!
Oct 19, 2020 20:40:40 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.