Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
78$ Carbon Fibre tripod?
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Jan 20, 2020 06:47:31   #
alberio Loc: Casa Grande AZ
 
Adamborz wrote:
If you’re talking about this one

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NSEKEMO?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_mob_b_asin_title

I love it for the price


This looks very similar to my Mefoto Traveler CF tripod and at a much better price. I love my Mefoto but I would not use it for my Canon 7D II and Tamron 150-600mm G2 except in zero wind and at lowest height, which then I get out my old heavy Samson Quickset which is very stable even in moderate winds. I do use the monopod feature of the Mefoto with good success. The bag that comes with these makes it convenient to pack it around.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 07:05:00   #
billnikon Loc: Pennsylvania/Ohio/Florida/Maui/Oregon/Vermont
 
Betaa wrote:
Hi everyone!

Finally decided that I should soon say goodbye to my cheap, $15 aluminium and plastic tripod and upgrade to something that doesn’t give me premature back pain or anxiety of breaking my gear whenever I use it.

Neewer is selling a carbon fibre tripod, that weights 1.54kg, extends to 166cm tall, and can hold 12kg of gear ontop. Oh, it also includes a ball head AND a fluid video head, all for about $78 USD. You can also apparently detach one of the legs to use as a monopod. If 78$ gives me even 80% of the build quality of more expensive, name brand tripods, I’m not sure I can justify spending any more money.

Anyone had any experience with this tripod? Other recommendations would also be great, but I’m still on a rather tight budget. Thanks guys
Hi everyone! br br Finally decided that I should ... (show quote)


You get what you pay for, especially when trying to save money on a tripod. I understand your mention of the specs of this tripod, it sounds really good.
For me, the tripod is the forth most important piece behind the camera, lens, and flash. I take my purchases seriously.
You need to ask yourself one question, "how can this $78 carbon fiber tripod be priced $400.00 lower than most other carbon fiber tripods?"
Make sure, if you order it, they have a no questions asked return policy.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 07:33:12   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
As far as tripods is concerned. I have an aluminum pan head tilt tripod that my father gave me when he sold his film SLR camera, to buy his first digital camera. The tripod is now 42 years old. I rarely use it, but it still gets the job done, to my satisfaction. And discontinued in the late 1980s. Yes, you get what you pay for. But, not always? .I once saw an ad for a tripod costing $1100. Under duress, the ball head on that $89 tripod, may not last many years. But, you can can always buy a replacement ball head, If it weakens. There was also an earlier posted link on this post, an eBay link, for a tripod costing $99. A Slik 700DX Pro. If, my tripod broke. I would not hesitate to buy that one.

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2020 08:33:18   #
mizzee Loc: Boston,Ma
 
I think you should save your money for a good tripod. You didn’t say what you have for gear but as part of your decision process weigh your camera and your heaviest lens, add a few pounds/kilos for possible acquisitions, and check that against the tripod specs for maximum weight.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 08:47:54   #
Adamborz
 
Well, as I posted before (and as my professional opinion as I’m a paid photographer), it’s great for what I use it for; mostly real estate but model shoots too!

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 08:50:22   #
Adamborz
 
mizzee wrote:
I think you should save your money for a good tripod. You didn’t say what you have for gear but as part of your decision process weigh your camera and your heaviest lens, add a few pounds/kilos for possible acquisitions, and check that against the tripod specs for maximum weight.


Before I’d spend $1000 on a tripod I would rather spend it on a lens. I can always hold the camera.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 09:09:15   #
Betaa Loc: Australia, Victoria
 
Adamborz wrote:
Before I’d spend $1000 on a tripod I would rather spend it on a lens. I can always hold the camera.


Same here - which is why this one caught my eye. Still saving up for a 70-200 lens, so I would rather not spend all the money I’ve saved up on an expensive tripod.

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2020 09:09:53   #
markwilliam1
 
Betaa wrote:
Hi everyone!

Finally decided that I should soon say goodbye to my cheap, $15 aluminium and plastic tripod and upgrade to something that doesn’t give me premature back pain or anxiety of breaking my gear whenever I use it.

Neewer is selling a carbon fibre tripod, that weights 1.54kg, extends to 166cm tall, and can hold 12kg of gear ontop. Oh, it also includes a ball head AND a fluid video head, all for about $78 USD. You can also apparently detach one of the legs to use as a monopod. If 78$ gives me even 80% of the build quality of more expensive, name brand tripods, I’m not sure I can justify spending any more money.

Anyone had any experience with this tripod? Other recommendations would also be great, but I’m still on a rather tight budget. Thanks guys
Hi everyone! br br Finally decided that I should ... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 09:12:43   #
markwilliam1
 
Thanks for the heads up on this tripod! After reading the reviews on Amazon I ordered the last one available so we’ll see.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 09:13:02   #
Betaa Loc: Australia, Victoria
 
mas24 wrote:
As far as tripods is concerned. I have an aluminum pan head tilt tripod that my father gave me when he sold his film SLR camera, to buy his first digital camera. The tripod is now 42 years old. I rarely use it, but it still gets the job done, to my satisfaction. And discontinued in the late 1980s. Yes, you get what you pay for. But, not always? .I once saw an ad for a tripod costing $1100. Under duress, the ball head on that $89 tripod, may not last many years. But, you can can always buy a replacement ball head, If it weakens. There was also an earlier posted link on this post, an eBay link, for a tripod costing $99. A Slik 700DX Pro. If, my tripod broke. I would not hesitate to buy that one.
As far as tripods is concerned. I have an aluminum... (show quote)


If the ball head does break after a couple of years, the replacement will probably be more expensive than the entire tripod

Although the kit that I’m looking at also includes a fluid head for video, which I would find useful for my media work.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 09:17:20   #
Adamborz
 
Betaa wrote:
Same here - which is why this one caught my eye. Still saving up for a 70-200 lens, so I would rather not spend all the money I’ve saved up on an expensive tripod.



Yep. Now obviously I’m not going to hang $5000 off something I think won’t support the weight. I think the negative reviews from people on this particular Tripod is/ are from them over tightening the damn thing. It doesn’t take much force to lock everything in place. I’ve read where people are breaking the center lock down. I can’t even imagine tightening it that much.

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2020 09:30:22   #
imagemeister Loc: mid east Florida
 
Adamborz wrote:
If you’re talking about this one

https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NSEKEMO?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_mob_b_asin_title

I love it for the price


At the bottom of the Amazon listing there is a later/newer/better version for $99 which seems better all the way around !
.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 09:45:52   #
Adamborz
 
imagemeister wrote:
At the bottom of the Amazon listing there is a later/newer/better version for $99 which seems better all the way around !
.



Damnit, now I want that one too lol. Just kidding, I’m happy with this one, much lighter than my old manfrotto aluminum one.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 10:03:18   #
mas24 Loc: Southern CA
 
Betaa wrote:
If the ball head does break after a couple of years, the replacement will probably be more expensive than the entire tripod

Although the kit that I’m looking at also includes a fluid head for video, which I would find useful for my media work.


I agree. But, I have seen cheap ball heads going for $110. I, personally don't use a ball head. I prefer the tilt pan head.

Reply
Jan 20, 2020 10:46:06   #
wapiti Loc: round rock, texas
 
jackpinoh wrote:
The 12kg rating is misleading. Cheap tripods are subject to vibration in a breeze or strong winds and have cheap heads that droop under the weight of the camera and lens. A $78 tripod is very cheap. Save your money until you can afford something you won't be disappointed with.



Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.