78$ Carbon Fibre tripod?
Jan 19, 2020 08:54:45 #
Betaa
Loc: Australia, Victoria
Hi everyone!
Finally decided that I should soon say goodbye to my cheap, $15 aluminium and plastic tripod and upgrade to something that doesn’t give me premature back pain or anxiety of breaking my gear whenever I use it.
Neewer is selling a carbon fibre tripod, that weights 1.54kg, extends to 166cm tall, and can hold 12kg of gear ontop. Oh, it also includes a ball head AND a fluid video head, all for about $78 USD. You can also apparently detach one of the legs to use as a monopod. If 78$ gives me even 80% of the build quality of more expensive, name brand tripods, I’m not sure I can justify spending any more money.
Anyone had any experience with this tripod? Other recommendations would also be great, but I’m still on a rather tight budget. Thanks guys
Finally decided that I should soon say goodbye to my cheap, $15 aluminium and plastic tripod and upgrade to something that doesn’t give me premature back pain or anxiety of breaking my gear whenever I use it.
Neewer is selling a carbon fibre tripod, that weights 1.54kg, extends to 166cm tall, and can hold 12kg of gear ontop. Oh, it also includes a ball head AND a fluid video head, all for about $78 USD. You can also apparently detach one of the legs to use as a monopod. If 78$ gives me even 80% of the build quality of more expensive, name brand tripods, I’m not sure I can justify spending any more money.
Anyone had any experience with this tripod? Other recommendations would also be great, but I’m still on a rather tight budget. Thanks guys
Jan 19, 2020 09:15:18 #
jackpinoh
Loc: Kettering, OH 45419
Betaa wrote:
Hi everyone! br br Finally decided that I should ... (show quote)
The 12kg rating is misleading. Cheap tripods are subject to vibration in a breeze or strong winds and have cheap heads that droop under the weight of the camera and lens. A $78 tripod is very cheap. Save your money until you can afford something you won't be disappointed with.
Jan 19, 2020 09:18:19 #
The Slik 700 DX Pro is a bit heavier because it is not carbon fiber. It is NOT a travel tripod ! It is very popular and has become the default pod for budget shooters - please read the user reviews ! Do get a decent head to go with it !
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Slik-700DX-Pro-Tripod-Legs-3-Sections-Camera-Tripods-Titanium-Finish-BRAND-NEW/292464133921?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l9372
.
https://www.ebay.com/itm/Slik-700DX-Pro-Tripod-Legs-3-Sections-Camera-Tripods-Titanium-Finish-BRAND-NEW/292464133921?ssPageName=STRK%3AMEBIDX%3AIT&_trksid=p2060353.m1438.l9372
.
Jan 19, 2020 09:20:20 #
I agree with jackpinoh. In my experience there is no such thing as a cheap, sturdy, lightweight tripod.
Jan 19, 2020 09:22:17 #
Just because it's made with carbon fiber doesn't mean it's a good deal. Engineering and build quality are far more important. Frankly, the 12 kg rating sounds pretty good, but the all in one ball head and fluid head sounds like they are trying to cover all the bases rather than be good at either one. While I admit that the price is attractive, I'd have to see one in hand before I'd purchase one. May be worth the money and adequate for your needs, but I'd have my doubts. Hopefully someone here owns one and can give us a first hand review. Generally speaking, you get what you pay for and photographic accessories are not an exception. Good luck and good shooting to all.
Jan 19, 2020 12:23:46 #
Hard to believe that any one can sell a good tripod for that price. i have a Cannondale road bike ad the carbon fiber seat post set me back around 200 dollars years ago. The fact of the matter is that a good tripod of carbon fiber or an alloy will cost much more than 78 dollars. a good ball head will cost you more.
Jan 19, 2020 12:46:47 #
Jan 19, 2020 12:47:43 #
Jan 19, 2020 12:48:05 #
Bill P wrote:
This is like the lab I used to use, there was a sign posted as follows: You can have it Good, Fast, and Cheap. Please pick two.
You are asking for something that is the photo unicorn. A perfect, cheap light weight tripod.
You are asking for something that is the photo unicorn. A perfect, cheap light weight tripod.
Jan 19, 2020 17:07:27 #
Betaa wrote:
Hi everyone! br br Finally decided that I should ... (show quote)
If you are on a tight budget, don't throw away money on junk. Consider why you need a tripod and how often you might use it - and you may end up relying on stabilization in the lens and/or body for slow shutter speed shooting.
Jan 19, 2020 19:48:08 #
#2 for the Slik 700 Pro. Good, solid, well made, reliable. I've had mine for more than 25 years and not one regret. It's a bit heavy, it's NOT a travel tripod and it's about $120 to $130.
Jan 20, 2020 05:32:00 #
If you’re talking about this one
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NSEKEMO?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_mob_b_asin_title
I love it for the price
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NSEKEMO?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_mob_b_asin_title
I love it for the price
Jan 20, 2020 06:27:52 #
Betaa
Loc: Australia, Victoria
Adamborz wrote:
If you’re talking about this one
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NSEKEMO?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_mob_b_asin_title
I love it for the price
https://www.amazon.com/gp/aw/d/B00NSEKEMO?psc=1&ref=ppx_pop_mob_b_asin_title
I love it for the price
Yup, I’m talking about this one.
Is it holding up to wear and tear fine?
Jan 20, 2020 06:34:39 #
It’s awesome for the price. The head is very smooth. The center raise/lower for camera isn’t that great (isn’t the smoothest) but I don’t mind that much.
I trust it to hold my expensive gear!
I trust it to hold my expensive gear!
Jan 20, 2020 06:37:52 #
Adamborz wrote:
It’s awesome for the price. The head is very smooth. The center raise/lower for camera isn’t that great (isn’t the smoothest) but I don’t mind that much.
I trust it to hold my expensive gear!
I trust it to hold my expensive gear!
Here is a pic of it. It is holding my 5d3 with 70-200 f/2.8 IS II
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.