yhtomit wrote:
Phreedom wrote:
Observations:
Why would failure to answer your alleged 3 of 4 questions be insulting to you or anyone?
RixPix didnt ignore you. Your first sentence was a statement but with a question mark. Your second sentence asked for a definition and RixPix again gave that. Your third sentence was Ive-got-my-eye-on-you: an attempt to intimidate with the bonus insult of calling RixPix kitty.
Interesting that RixPixs experiential beliefs about levels of education and how some people react means he is stifled in personal growth and maturity but your life lessons, conclusions and beliefs dont.
Assuming you do care about the issues and are trying to correct faulty beliefs and win converts; is making bald, insulting, unsupported, inaccurate statements an intelligent response to things you disagree on?
Do you believe that
you, I guess
the "under educated" possess a more valid real life experience and are thus superior to the "educated"?
You assess RixPix and his Adlai Stevenson quote as being self-inflated and meaningless. I suggest you fail to understand either the content or the context of his reply.
And what is this continuing fascination with illusionary acts of masturbation to support your position?
Nothing about the human condition
the humanities
disgusts me. But there are some human behaviors that dismay me.
Good luck to you, sir. I feel your frustration.
br Observations: br Why would failure to answer... (
show quote)
Thanx for joining the ...errr...conversation.
Without the asking and answering of questions you can't have a conversation.It would be a lecture,speech,poetry reading...
I had an attorney and doctor for parents and had to deal with their associates and friends.I was always amazed at the different ways a person would choose to not answer a question.
No I disagree,it is in the form of a question,your missing the inflection.
Please show me where he defined"under educated" in relationship to"educated"in relationship to"over educated"?
I can't comprehend or imagine where you got"I've got an eye on you".I'll need help on that one please.
The "kitty" was an obvious failed attempt at humor.RP's avatar is that of a cat and gender-less.
Your sentence starting with"interesting" doesn't make sense to me.
Your sentence starting with"Assuming".I'll say no.Just trying to get a light bulb to go off some where to be nice and less condescending.
Your sentence starting with"Do".I'll say your wrong.I'm probably in the undefined"over educated"category.
The next sentence starting with"You".To me it was an attempt to answer the question with a metaphor hidden in this quote.It did not answer the question.You should be able to see that.
Have I been masturbating my mind in writing in public too?I apologize.
I guess almost lastly,I think we are using different definitions,but
unfortunately we can't control that.
Good luck to you.I found this quite refreshing.Thanx.
quote=Phreedom br Observations: br Why would f... (
show quote)
Sorry if my post came across as a lecture.
So much to reply to! Well try them in order and endeavor to be terse.
Yes, our politicians failure to give simple and direct answers is frustrating. Many examples abound but Charles Durning in Best Little WH in Texas plays it out nicely
http://videosift.com/video/Best-Little-Whorehouse-in-Texas-Dance-a-little-Sidestep When I read your first sentence I did not hear a voice rising at the end to indicate a question and judged the ? to be a typo. If you remove the ? and read it again, you might agree.
Page 4, Sep 4, 12 19:57:42,
I guess when people read and become educated they can be viewed as proud of their accomplishments and full of themselves.
That seems straight forward.
Those that feel the need to[p] point out this pride are often at the other end of spectrum...under educated and envious of the success of others.
While not a Merriam-Webster entry, it seems a fairly clear belief/observation. I understood.
As to over educated
I think that was your word choice from Page 5, Sep 5, 12 00:43:15.
You dont think that You have my full attention now kitty especially coming at the end a paragraph that says, in effect, justify your stand, isnt meant to be just a tiny bit intimidating
or a dare maybe? The only time you refer to RixPix by name, you call him kitty. I could probably write a dissertation on that alone.
I thought interesting was self-explanatory. RixPix relates a conclusion based on his life experiences. Your assessment based on your experiences seems to be that others (the under educated) have one upped with a more valid real life experience that invalidates RixPixs.
I did clarify the Do sentence with you, I guess as I wasnt sure which class you assigned yourself to due to the one upped comment. Yes, you do appear to be knowledgeable and literate. Over educated? Perhaps if one was referencing the needs of a specific job, etc.
The next sentence starting with You. I saw the quote only as an example of the type of rhetoric that the under educated views as being pompous, nerdy, over educated, self- important, etc.
It would have been a better example to contrast it with a sample of the more common vernacular as used by such inspiring speakers as Will Rogers, Martin Luther King and JFK.
As to differing definitions
well, thats what makes a horse race.
Enough! Any more of this and Ill be accusing myself of indulging in illusionary acts of
whatever it was you wrote.
Thanks for indulging me. Im not sure weve changed anything but you made me think and Ive rather enjoyed this too.
quote=yhtomit quote=Phreedom br Observations: ... (