Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
The Attic
This Is Our Own Fault!
Page <<first <prev 6 of 8 next> last>>
Aug 17, 2019 06:03:39   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
LWW wrote:
Read a book, preferably the Federalist Papers.


I absolutely agree that The Constitution was not well thought out. But it is black ink language on paper or really parchment. It is what we have. There are many ways we can interpret what is written. That is sometimes we use those funny little marks....what do you call 'em....punctuation!

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 06:11:27   #
jcboy3
 
LWW wrote:
Read a book, preferably the Federalist Papers.


So it's okay to interpret the Constitution based on documents that are over 300 years old, reflecting on a society that is long gone. And based in a time of s***ery, suppression, and exploitation. They had no respect for "The People", just their privileged and repressive white boy clan.

Then it's okay to interpret the Constitution based on the needs of the people that are living here now. Especially if those interpretations are intended to prevent suppression and exploitation.

A literal Constitution isn't worth the paper it was written on.

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 06:16:21   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
jcboy3 wrote:
So it's okay to interpret the Constitution based on documents that are over 300 years old, reflecting on a society that is long gone. And based in a time of s***ery, suppression, and exploitation. They had no respect for "The People", just their privileged and repressive white boy clan.

Then it's okay to interpret the Constitution based on the needs of the people that are living here now. Especially if those interpretations are intended to prevent suppression and exploitation.

A literal Constitution isn't worth the paper it was written on.
So it's okay to interpret the Constitution based o... (show quote)


The FP was written by the authors of the COTUS and was well thought out in great detail about what it all meant so that interpretation wasn’t needed.

A means of future generations amending it was also included.

You really should read both.

Reply
 
 
Aug 17, 2019 06:34:04   #
jcboy3
 
LWW wrote:
The FP was written by the authors of the COTUS and was well thought out in great detail about what it all meant so that interpretation wasn’t needed.

A means of future generations amending it was also included.

You really should read both.


I have read both. It was not well thought out with respect to the rights of the people. Of course, if you aren't a member of a subjected class, you probably think everything is okay.

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 06:39:23   #
Scruples Loc: Brooklyn, New York
 
LWW wrote:
Read a book, preferably the Federalist Papers.


Very few people have social conscience. I wanted to end the chatter at work and on the bus and etc. hand wringing won't help anyone. As citizens we have a responsibility to care about another. In a small context of care, we at least should be civil to each other. Most people are not and cannot understand why other people don't associate with them.

I believe that Mahatma Ghandi said:
Be the change you wish to see in the World.

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 06:42:50   #
WNYShooter Loc: WNY
 
Bazbo wrote:
Can you specifically cite where in Heller where Scalia wrote that the citizens have the right to own weapons comparable to the military? Its been a long time since I have read the entire opinion, but I don't recall that. In fact, what I recall is just the opposite--the opinion being abut hand guns and not tanks and machine guns. And Scalia affirmed the rights of states and localities to enact firearm regulation.

Also, a little historical perspective. For the entire nations history, up to Heller, the judicial consensus about Number Two is that it was restricted to the m*****a part and not an individual right.

Going back further to Federalist 29, an individual right is not mentioned, although it is fair to assume that it was understood in that nearly every man in the Colonies had a musket.

https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/fed29.asp
Can you specifically cite where in Heller where Sc... (show quote)


What you are looking for was covered in the Miller decision, not Heller.

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 06:44:36   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
jcboy3 wrote:
I have read both. It was not well thought out with respect to the rights of the people. Of course, if you aren't a member of a subjected class, you probably think everything is okay.


Sorry, but your post history shows an incredible ignorance of both topics ... and I am a member of more than one subjected class.

Reply
 
 
Aug 17, 2019 06:44:45   #
anotherview Loc: California
 
Ditto.
LWW wrote:
Read a book, preferably the Federalist Papers.

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 06:50:41   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
WNYShooter wrote:
What you are looking for was covered in the Miller decision, not Heller.


I was trying to remember the case.

But, yes, it is well established that military weapons are protected under the second.

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 07:11:48   #
jcboy3
 
LWW wrote:
Sorry, but your post history shows an incredible ignorance of both topics ... and I am a member of more than one subjected class.


If you think my post history is a history test, you are deluded.

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 07:20:26   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
jcboy3 wrote:
If you think my post history is a history test, you are deluded.


Then you shouldn't pontificate on subjects about which you are admittedly uninformed.

A more logical path forward for you would be to become more learned on said subjects.

Might I suggest reading books?

Reply
 
 
Aug 17, 2019 07:24:07   #
jcboy3
 
LWW wrote:
Then you shouldn't pontificate on subjects about which you are admittedly uninformed.

A more logical path forward for you would be to become more learned on said subjects.

Might I suggest reading books?


Why do you lie?

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 07:27:54   #
LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America
 
jcboy3 wrote:
Why do you lie?


You can't even comprehend your own excuses.

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 08:43:44   #
BigBear Loc: Northern CT
 
Scruples wrote:
I absolutely agree that The Constitution was not well thought out. But it is black ink language on paper or really parchment. It is what we have. There are many ways we can interpret what is written. That is sometimes we use those funny little marks....what do you call 'em....punctuation!


The Constitution is not to be interpreted. It is taken as written, not made to say what you want it to.

Reply
Aug 17, 2019 08:45:10   #
BigBear Loc: Northern CT
 
Scruples wrote:
Very few people have social conscience. I wanted to end the chatter at work and on the bus and etc. hand wringing won't help anyone. As citizens we have a responsibility to care about another. In a small context of care, we at least should be civil to each other. Most people are not and cannot understand why other people don't associate with them.

I believe that Mahatma Ghandi said:
Be the change you wish to see in the World.


Which means you have the ability to change yourself to be an example, not to make anyone else change to meet your needs.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 6 of 8 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
The Attic
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.