Blurryeyed wrote:
I was looking at that lens, DXO has the 300 off the charts sharp, they have a funky rating system, perceived mgea pixels, but they give the 300 45 P-Mpix, the deal is that the 400's were just a tad more than I could afford, I found this lens at a pretty good price through Adorama and just took the plunge. Regis here shoots the same lens and it seems that money is not a problem for him in acquiring gear, I talked to him about it a bit before making the purchase.
Here is a simple test with and without the extender, this chair was about 30 ft away and I thought that the thread pattern would be a good test. No sharpening or processing has been done to these images. I think that without the extender the lens is visibly sharper as shown in the crops, but 300mm is a bit short for birding and with the extender the lens still looks quite usable for birding and allows for substantially more cropping. Another plus is that the 300 is lot easier to handle than my 500mm, it is shorter, better balanced on the camera, and definitely lighter. The 400 would have been similar in size and weight to my 500.
I will have to do a comparison between this lens with the 2X and the 500 with and without the 1.4X extender.
I was looking at that lens, DXO has the 300 off th... (
show quote)
Long ago I tried the 500 4.5 - that is when I decided the 300 with 2X was better for ME. Back then there was no 400 DO tho 8-(
.