The wall we payed for (Page 2): The Democrats supported Ike Eisenhower when he was president and wanted money to build the Berlin wall to keep C*******m out. That was the consensus of...

dpullum Loc: Tampa Florida

The Democrats supported Ike Eisenhower when he was president and wanted money to build the Berlin wall to keep C*******m out. That was the consensus of a group of seniors in Florida with whom i have coffee with Saturday mornings ... they support Trump all the way.

sb Loc: Florida's East Coast

Did they have to keep out poor women and children fleeing violence and seeking asylum?

letmedance Loc: Walnut, Ca.

thom w wrote:

What? You are saying the purpose of the wall is to... (show quote)

If a tunnel must be dug then the wall must be working, simple grade school logic.

Bunko.T Loc: Western Australia.

letmedance wrote:

So right you are, protecting the borders of other countries is more important than protecting our own. 😳😳😳😳😳

WHO SAID WALLS DONT WORK???
THE CHINESE BUILT ONE 2000 YEARS AGO. AND THERES STILL NO MEXICANS THERE???

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

sb wrote:

Did they have to keep out poor women and children fleeing violence and seeking asylum?

Read a book.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

dpullum wrote:

The Democrats supported Ike Eisenhower when he was president and wanted money to build the Berlin wall to keep C*******m out. That was the consensus of a group of seniors in Florida with whom i have coffee with Saturday mornings ... they support Trump all the way.

Ike didn’t build the Berlin Wall.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

letmedance wrote:

If a tunnel must be dug then the wall must be working, simple grade school logic.

Which is why it escapes some people.

Kraken Loc: Barry's Bay

letmedance wrote:

If a tunnel must be dug then the wall must be working, simple grade school logic.

Yep

That logic sounds like it came from a 5 year old.

LWW Loc: Banana Republic of America

Kraken wrote:

Yep

That logic sounds like it came from a 5 year old.

Now that’s progress, you can finally admit the average 5 year old can see the obvious which you can’t.

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

thom w wrote:

You could likely spend a trillion on the southern border and not do what you are hoping it would but piss off a lot of law abiding ranchers and devastate many small towns.

you have not a clue what you are talking about!!!

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

wooden_ships wrote:

Walls like that are effective when manned with military RoE that allow shoot to k**l. Those walls are smaller and much easier to patrol. Our wall is estimated to cost a minimum of $4 million per mile not to mention on-going cost of manning and maintenance. I don’t want my tax money wasted on this non-solution when there are better, more cost-effective solutions.

I didn't want my tax money building a wall in Jordan either. Money is not the issue and 4 million per mile is nothing in a 413 trillion dollar budget. Since the border patrol, ICE and other agencies want a wall and say it will definitely help, I think they have more information than you do.

Below is the statistics for just the criminal i******s in this country for the last 3 years. One would have to be insane to think having those criminals in the country is a good thing, or that building a wall is a bad thing. I******s cost us 155 billion a year, I guess you would rather pay that than put up a wall? Border arrests exceed 50 thousand per month, but I guess you would rather pay for that then put up a wall? Even if it was 25,000 a month, that is a lot of i******s. We need a wall and technology to keep them out.

https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/cbp-enforcement-statistics/criminal-alien-statistics

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

thom w wrote:

You could likely spend a trillion on the southern border and not do what you are hoping it would but piss off a lot of law abiding ranchers and devastate many small towns.

Little tommie, you are just spouting crap. I would safely assume the experts know more than you and they definitely want a wall along with technology. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOWNSIDE TO A WALL. EXCEPT YOU WON'T BE GROWING THE DEMOCRAT V**ER BASE.

Elaine2025 Loc: Seattle, Wa

thom w wrote:

Spending the money you want to spend on the wall on high tech measures could repell many more people and much more contraband.
How deep are you prepared to build the wall. So far they have found tunnels as deep as 90 feet.

They can find tunnels much deeper than that with ground penetrating radar Einstein.

wilpharm Loc: Oklahoma

Elaine2025 wrote:

Little tommie, you are just spouting crap. I would safely assume the experts know more than you and they definitely want a wall along with technology. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO DOWNSIDE TO A WALL. EXCEPT YOU WON'T BE GROWING THE DEMOCRAT V**ER BASE.

I guess thommie the genius has not seen the trash & occasional corpses that are spread on those ranches & the fact that several ranchers have been murdered by the drug-running i******s...and as far as ruining the small town economies??? guess he just pulled that out of his genius butt..

soba1 Loc: Somewhere In So Ca

sb wrote:

Did they have to keep out poor women and children fleeing violence and seeking asylum?

We already have plenty of poor women and children that were born here sleeping on the streets of LA what about them charity begins at home. Make sure your family has food shelter and clothing before you run off and help someone else. LA loves taking care of the i******s BUILD THAT WALL

https://youtu.be/ODZnYUqxYiM