Ugly Hedgehog - Photography Forum
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main Photography Discussion
More Exposure and How It Works - A Beginner's Guide - Part 3
Page 1 of 2 next>
Jan 20, 2019 14:20:20   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Well, it's time to take a look at putting all of this together and some unintended consequences involved in obtaining a good photograph. Due to inherent restrictions, I can't post the illustrations accompanying the final post. You can view the posts in their original form at these links.

Exposure and How It Works - A Beginner's Guide
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-574357-1.html

More Exposure and How It Works - A Beginner's Guide
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-574448-1.html

Finishing Up Exposure and How It Works - A Beginner's Guide - This one so you can bookmark all of them.
https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-574638-1.html#9795237

So far all seems fine and good. However, there are consequences to each choice you make in getting that scale to balance or that glass to fill just to the rim. But, first, let us acquaint, or re-acquaint ourselves with some terms you'™ll be using quite frequently. As a refresher we will review a couple of already discussed terms.

ISO - It is a system that specifies the sensitivity of the sensor or film to light. The higher the number the more sensitive to light the material is. The more sensitive the material the less photographic exposure is needed to obtain an image. Conversely, the less light is needed to obtain an image, as well. This is expressed simply as ISO with a number following.

Aperture - The effective diameter of the lens. To change the effective diameter, we adjust the aperture setting on the lens. Starting with the lens wide open we have the maximum aperture. This is also the number that will be used in denoting a particular lens, such as a 50mm f/1.4 lens. The lower this number is, the faster that lens is said to be. Adjusting the aperture setting will reduce, from completely open, to some smaller diameter, thus controlling the amount of light passing through the lens. This is expressed as an f-stop.

Shutter Speed - This is the amount of time the shutter stays open, allowing light to strike the photosensitive material. This is most commonly expressed in seconds and fractions thereof.

Here are some new terms.

Depth of Field - DOF is how much of the scene, measured from the camera, is acceptably sharp, or apparently in focus.

Motion Blur - Is the apparent blurring of any objects within a photograph due to the subject or the camera moving during the taking of the photograph.

Systems Management - The administration of associated systems in order to obtain an optimum desired result from that combination of systems, another name for photography.

Let's review a few things before we start getting really involved with clicking the shutter. We'll also describe each and then some side effects associated with each.

Shutter Speed - is the simplest of these settings. So, let's get that out of the way first. It is usually denoted in seconds or fractions of seconds. Whole seconds are easy 1,2, 3, etc. The numbers on your shutter speed setting are fractions of a second. 1/2, 1/4, 1/8, etc, The smaller the fraction the shorter time the shutter remains open. That is pretty much it.

Aperture or f-stop This is the diameter of the opening in the lens through which light is allowed to pass on its way to the photosensitive material. The larger the diameter the more light is allowed through. Conversely, the smaller the diameter the less light is allowed through. This opening is related to f-stops. Unlike the straight forward shutter speed numbers, f-stops can be a bit less simple. The f-stop number is a ratio of the focal length of the lens to the diameter of the aperture, f-stop=Focal Length/Opening. The basic glass elements of a lens have a fixed diameter. The aperture blades within the lens assembly are adjusted through the aperture setting to be equal to or less than that fixed diameter. The results of this math of dividing is that the larger the f-number the smaller the opening is. This gets easier as you use it more.

ISO - This is how reactive to light the photosensitive film or sensor is. We'™ll use photosensitive material to describe either film or sensor. The higher the number the more sensitive. The more sensitive the less photographic exposure is needed to recorded a scene. This less photographic exposure can be the result of less light, faster shutter speed, or smaller aperture. Another aspect is that the higher the sensitivity the shorter the time the shutter needs to be open to allow the correct amount of light to strike the photo material. Finally, the higher the ISO is set the smaller the aperture can be to allow the correct amount of light to strike the photo material. The opposite is true for setting the ISO to lower numbers. Conversely, the more light that is needed, a longer shutter speed is needed and / or a larger aperture is needed.

Putting It All Together
This has all been pretty simple up to this point. Now, we need to start associating these three quantities and look at the intended, and / or unintended, consequences of our choices of the above three values. This is where it gets somewhat complicated. However, if the student of photography is well acquainted with the three values of ISO, Shutter Speed, and Aperture, it becomes rather second nature.

ISO - The higher the ISO is set, more sensitive to light. The unintended consequence is grain. In the film world, it's because of the use of larger silver halide crystals in the faster films. The larger the crystal the more light it can gather. In the electronics world it's a matter of signal to noise ratio. Signal, in our case, is light. Noise is an inherent characteristic of electrical circuits, much the same as silver halide crystals are part of film photography. Let us use an example with which many folks are familiar. Listening to the radio. In fact, let'™s put that radio in an automobile. As one is driving down the road listening to the radio there is also the noise of the vehicle, the engine, the tires on the road surface, and the wind as it passes over the vehicle.

While driving through a neighborhood at a slow speed the radio is sufficiently loud and quite clear. However, start driving on a high speed roadway and the urge is to turn up the volume, thus increasing the amount of signal, the sound, to the amount of noise. At some point the radio obscures the various noises. Never the less, the noise is still there. Also, if one tunes the radio to a frequency on which there is no broadcast, a hiss is audible. That's electronic noise. However, once tuned to a frequency on which there is a broadcast, the noise seems to disappear, as it's overpowered by the signal of the station. However, it's still there. The same happens with digital photography. The proper exposure, in most cases, will obscure the grain from being overtly visible. Do not fret. Noise, or as I prefer grain, is part of photography. In fact, let us just call it grain.

There are exposure techniques that can minimize visible grain, but that's for another discussion.

Shutter Speed - This is the amount of time the shutter is open, generally in fractions of a second. Here's a real world experiment you can do, and it is free. Stand or sit by a roadway or sidewalk. Pick a location where there is a lot of movement. You are going to pretend to be a camera. So, you will need to close your eyes. Before you close your eyes, notice something in the near distance, a lamppost, a mailbox, anything. Without shifting your eyes, close them. Then open them for a very short period of time and close them again quickly. You just made an exposure. Anything that was within sight is captured, you may even see a bit of persistent vision of the scene. People, cars, etc. were captured within that short time you opened your eyes.

Now, without changing your attention to that near distant object, open your eyes and stare at that object for a second or two. Close your eyes. Things that were stationary are locked in your visual memory. Things that were moving are pretty much a blur. The camera works the same way. Additional to objects moving, the camera can also move. This complicates things a bit, too. So, try looking straight ahead, opening your eyes, and move your head around. Nothing but blur. Same with a camera.

So, shutter speed is going to have to be chosen in such a manner as to be fast enough to capture your intended subject, and / or counter any slight movement of the camera.

Depth of Field of DOF is a characteristic associated with any lens. We'll use subject to describe that on which we want to focus. Object will refer to things in the scene, but of secondary interest.

Every focal length lens, regardless of manufacturer, has a characteristic called Depth of Field. When focused on a subject that distance and only that distance is the distance from the camera that is in focus. If we focus on a subject, that subject and any other object in the scene at the same distance will be "perfectly" in focus. Any object at a shorter distance or farther distance will not be "perfectly" in focus. However, there is a near and far distance that will have objects that are very close to being in focus. So close that they will, for all intended purposes, be in focus. The distance between the nearest acceptably focused object and the farthest acceptably focused object is Depth of Field.

There are a couple of interesting aspects to DOF. The total DOF is distributed such that the nearest object which appears to be in focus is 1/3 of the total DOF in front of the subject and the farthest object which appears to be in focus is 2/3 of the total DOF behind the subject. This is an optical characteristic of a lens. Though the DOF may be different for different focal length lenses, or distances to subject, the distribution is always the same, 1/3 in front and 2/3 behind. See the impeccably done illustration below.

As one stops down the aperture, the depth of field will increase, as well. The wider angle lenses will have a larger depth of field than telephoto lenses. Also, as the subject is located farther away from the lens, the depth of field will increase with smaller f-stops. Lenses of 400-500mm and up, have very little depth of field regardless of f-stop.

For the sake of example, let's take a 35mm f/2 lens, see the illustration below. The lens featured for this discussion is an older lens which incorporated a convenient scale that the photographer can use to evaluate the depth of field. The f-stops are color coded with matching colored indicators showing the near and far extents of the DOF.

See the photograph of the two lenses side by side labeled DOF. Note in lens on the left focused at something between 1 and 1.25 feet, the depth of field is about .25 feet. Note on the lens on the right, the lens is focused at a subject farther away. The indicated DOF is between around 5 feet to around 15 feet at f/22. If one were to move the f-stop settings to smaller apertures, notice that the corresponding colored lines are located closer together, indicating a shallower DOF. At f/2.8 and f/2 there is virtually no depth of field.

Systems Management
For example you are going to photograph a outdoor scene which features moving subjects. Depending on how fast the subjects are moving, one will need to select a faster shutter speed. This will require a more open lens. So the lens is going to need a larger f-stop. That is going to decrease the DOF. Hmm. What to do? Well, one can increase the ISO, thus requiring a bit less light and that allows us to stop the lens down a bit and gain back the DOF we wanted. We've just managed the three systems available to us to accomplish a photograph that stops the motion, maintains close to the DOF we desired, and kept grain to a minimum.

Let's say for another example, we are going to be indoors for a performance. We are not allowed to use flash. The stage will be well lit, but we are a number of rows away from it. We'll probably need a lens of moderate telephoto length. We have one, but the best it can do is f/5.6. The performers are not moving around a lot. So, we can probably get by with 1/250 for our shutter. We'll use f/5.6 and have to sacrifice DOF to minimize the ISO we'll need to use to get that exposure to balance. These are just a couple of examples of how we'll need to manage the systems that are used to make a photograph. As mentioned, this is systems management. Fortunately, the systems are predicable, to a good degree

Well, hopefully, the novice photography student has gained enough insight to the understand that there is a systems management situation every time a photograph is being taken. It's trade offs with DOF, shutter speed, grain. etc. There will be situations where taking the optimal exposure is just not possible, but getting close enough is going to be good enough. Artistic quality, perhaps not, but a lasting memory can be captured. In some cases, the focus is secondary to the importance of the image. There are a lot of photographs of The D-Day Invasion. A good many of them are not in focus or blurred by movement. This does not diminish the importance of those photographs. Conversely, there will be situations where you are afforded the time to determine an exact exposure, precise focus, and great composition. Take advantage of what you've learned here and through experience to make the most of that, or any other photographic moment. Always attempt to produce the best you can. Most importantly, never give up in your attempts to improve over the last photograph you've taken. Thanks for reading and I hope you've learned.

Some Guidelines and Tricks
Minimum Shutter Speed
Remember the moving the camera illustration. A rule of thumb is the slowest shutter speed should be equal to the focal length of the lens you'™re using. If you are using a 35mm lens, the slowest shutter speed would be 1/30sec. If you are using a 28~85mm zoom, but at 60mm focal length, the minimum should be 1/60sec. This is to accommodate camera movement during the exposure. If the subject is moving, you'™ll probably need to accommodate that movement, as opposed to camera movement.

Hyperfocal Technique
This is a nifty trick to convert your DSLR to a point and shoot. Notice in our illustrations of the DOF. There is a third photograph illustrating hyperfocal setting for that lens. If I were photographing something at infinity for that lens, I'd place the infinity symbol over the White focus line on the lens. My nearest DOF distance would be perhaps 6 feet. However, if I were to place the infinity symbol at the far end of the DOF, I increase my depth of field so a bit over 3 feet to infinity. This is one of the nice things about the older lenses with DOF indications. It helps to make the setting a bit more precise. The advantage of this is that when set to the hyperfocal setting, everything the camera is pointed at between 3 feet to infinity will be focused. Can you say point and shoot.

-Bob

Reply
Jan 20, 2019 19:17:47   #
AndyH Loc: Massachusetts and New Hampshire
 
Pulling it all together. What a great beginner series, Bob!

Andy

Reply
Jan 20, 2019 19:45:34   #
RichardTaylor Loc: Sydney, Australia
 
Thanks Bob.

Reply
 
 
Jan 20, 2019 19:51:39   #
BebuLamar
 
Bob!
If there any more of this? Perhaps I missed something but I haven't seen where you show how to determine exposure yet.

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 10:17:13   #
genocolo Loc: Vail and Gasparilla Island
 
Thanks for all your work and thinking on this excellent guide.

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 10:37:08   #
pats
 
Well written and thorough, Bob. Particularly explanation of ISO. In “film speed” days, we were trapped by the film ISO loaded in the camera and primary attention was to aperture and shutter speed, DOF, and other compositional matters. Digital cameras’ offer great ISO flexibility but add a third dimension that must be attended to. Your passage about increased grain at a high ISO should in bold print.

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 11:31:29   #
yssirk123 Loc: New Jersey
 
Great post Bob - thanks for sharing.

Reply
 
 
Jan 21, 2019 11:37:52   #
Elmerviking
 
I can’t see ANY illustrations! Where are they?

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 12:01:08   #
Jimmy T Loc: Virginia
 
Just think of the $$ I could have saved if you had just put this "Cookbook" out just a few years back.
Now I have all of my basic "How To's" in one place.
Bravo Zulu Bob!!!
JimmyT Sends

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 13:10:01   #
Redmond Loc: Oregon
 
really enjoyed these posts, thank you

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 15:26:15   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
There is a part 3 as well as an addendum that I just posted. Though, the idea of determining exposure is not covered specifically. The idea was to emphasize the relationship of ISO, shutter speed, and aperture. I do however, touch on spot metering the brightest part of the scene and adjusting exposure based on that.

Additionally, I posted a mini tutorial on some night photos I took a few days ago that touches on exposure. https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-574646-1.html
--Bob
BebuLamar wrote:
Bob!
If there any more of this? Perhaps I missed something but I haven't seen where you show how to determine exposure yet.

Reply
 
 
Jan 21, 2019 15:27:19   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
There aren't any in this part of the series.
--Bob
Elmerviking wrote:
I can’t see ANY illustrations! Where are they?

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 15:29:21   #
rmalarz Loc: Tempe, Arizona
 
Thank everyone of you for taking time to read and comment. It's appreciated. I can see where this is going to be a regularly posted series, as there are new members arriving daily and posting this once or twice a year might prove helpful.
--Bob

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 15:42:54   #
BebuLamar
 
rmalarz wrote:
There is a part 3 as well as an addendum that I just posted. Though, the idea of determining exposure is not covered specifically. The idea was to emphasize the relationship of ISO, shutter speed, and aperture. I do however, touch on spot metering the brightest part of the scene and adjusting exposure based on that.

Additionally, I posted a mini tutorial on some night photos I took a few days ago that touches on exposure. https://www.uglyhedgehog.com/t-574646-1.html
--Bob


Thanks!

Reply
Jan 21, 2019 15:53:54   #
f8lee Loc: New Mexico
 
Bob, I'm surprised you didn't mention the "double/half" concept that pervades the three criteria of which you speak - ISO, Aperture and shutter speed. When I taught photography I found it was a way to simplify the relationship among them - that ISO400 is twice as sensitive as ISO200 and half as sensitive as ISO 800, that f5.6 allows in half the light that f4 does and twice the light f8 does, and that each adjacent shutter speed (in the normal increments) allows half or twice as much light through as the adjacent one. This way, the shooter can easily "calculate" that if she wants to use 1/250th second shutter speed to get a shot but the meter is indicating that shutter speed 1/60th is appropriate, opening the lens by two stops (or, equivalently, raising the ISO from 200 to 800) will enable the same exposure value overall. Of course, the details of DOF at different apertures (as well as focal lengths), motion blur at shitter speeds, noise at higher ISO are all to be taken into account too. But the double/half notion seems to go over pretty easily to get them started.

If you already mentioned this in you r earlier posts sorry -I haven't seen them.

Reply
Page 1 of 2 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main Photography Discussion
UglyHedgehog.com - Forum
Copyright 2011-2024 Ugly Hedgehog, Inc.